• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The relationship of the intensity of posttreatment prostate-specific antigen surveillance and prostate cancer outcomes: results from a population-based cohort.治疗后前列腺特异性抗原监测强度与前列腺癌结局的关系:基于人群队列的研究结果。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Jun;87(6):540-7. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.01.017.
2
Assessing the Optimal Timing for Early Salvage Radiation Therapy in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen Rise After Radical Prostatectomy.评估前列腺癌根治术后前列腺特异性抗原升高患者早期挽救性放射治疗的最佳时机
Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):728-733. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
3
Are biochemical recurrence outcomes similar after radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy? Analysis of prostate cancer-specific mortality by nomogram-predicted risks of biochemical recurrence.根治性前列腺切除术和放疗后生化复发结局是否相似?基于列线图预测生化复发风险的前列腺癌特异性死亡率分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Feb;67(2):204-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.017. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
4
External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.临床分期为T1-2期前列腺癌的体外放射治疗与根治性前列腺切除术:根据治疗前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平和活检Gleason评分分层的治疗意义
Cancer J Sci Am. 1997 Mar-Apr;3(2):78-87.
5
Management of localised prostate cancer: watchful waiting, surgery or radiation therapy, depending on the natural course, which is often relatively slow.局限性前列腺癌的治疗:根据其自然病程(通常进展相对缓慢),可选择观察等待、手术或放射治疗。
Prescrire Int. 2012 Oct;21(131):242-8.
6
Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.临床局限性前列腺癌行根治性前列腺切除术、外照射放疗或近距离放疗后的生化结果。
JAMA. 1998 Sep 16;280(11):969-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.11.969.
7
The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺特异性抗原持续存在对预测淋巴结阳性前列腺癌患者临床进展和癌症特异性死亡率的作用。
Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):1142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.010. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
8
Improved biochemical outcome with adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with poor pathologic features.对于具有不良病理特征的前列腺癌患者,根治性前列腺切除术后辅助放疗可改善生化结局。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Mar 1;61(3):714-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.018.
9
Body mass index and prostate-specific antigen failure following brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌近距离放射治疗后的体重指数与前列腺特异性抗原失败情况
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Aug 1;71(5):1302-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.11.073. Epub 2008 Feb 11.
10
Prognostic Value of Biochemical Recurrence Following Treatment with Curative Intent for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.根治性治疗后生化复发对前列腺癌预后的价值:系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2019 Jun;75(6):967-987. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.011. Epub 2018 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Posttreatment surveillance intensity and overall survival in prostate cancer survivors (AFT-30).前列腺癌幸存者的治疗后监测强度与总生存(AFT-30)。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Nov 1;8(6). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae099.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer among US veterans.美国退伍军人前列腺癌生化复发的影响
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Aug 9;170(15):1390-5. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.262.
2
Lifelong yearly prostate specific antigen surveillance is not necessary for low risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.对于接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗的低危前列腺癌患者,不需要终身每年进行前列腺特异性抗原监测。
J Urol. 2010 Sep;184(3):925-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.05.043.
3
The economic burden of prostate cancer survivorship care.前列腺癌生存者照护的经济负担。
J Urol. 2010 Aug;184(2):532-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.136. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
4
Cancer statistics, 2010.癌症统计数据,2010 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277-300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
5
NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer.美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)肿瘤学临床实践指南:前列腺癌
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010 Feb;8(2):162-200. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0012.
6
Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌大样本主动监测队列长期随访的临床结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 1;28(1):126-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2180. Epub 2009 Nov 16.
7
The importance of serum prostate-specific antigen testing frequency in assessing biochemical and clinical failure after prostate cancer treatment.血清前列腺特异性抗原检测频率在评估前列腺癌治疗后生化和临床失败中的重要性。
Urology. 2010 Feb;75(2):467-71. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.051. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
8
Psychosocial factors associated with an increased frequency of prostate cancer screening in men ages 40 to 79 years: the Olmsted County study.40至79岁男性前列腺癌筛查频率增加相关的社会心理因素:奥姆斯特德县研究
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Dec;17(12):3588-92. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0050.
9
Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors.前列腺癌幸存者的生活质量及对治疗结果的满意度
N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 20;358(12):1250-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa074311.
10
Is the GPSM scoring algorithm for patients with prostate cancer valid in the contemporary era?用于前列腺癌患者的GPSM评分算法在当代是否有效?
J Urol. 2007 Aug;178(2):459-63; discussion 463. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.124. Epub 2007 Jun 11.

治疗后前列腺特异性抗原监测强度与前列腺癌结局的关系:基于人群队列的研究结果。

The relationship of the intensity of posttreatment prostate-specific antigen surveillance and prostate cancer outcomes: results from a population-based cohort.

机构信息

Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Jun;87(6):540-7. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.01.017.

DOI:10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.01.017
PMID:22677074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3498058/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether higher intensity of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) surveillance was associated with earlier detection of biochemical recurrence (BCR) or survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified a population-based cohort of 832 men diagnosed with nonmetastatic prostate cancer between January 1, 1995, and July 31, 2006. These men were treated with radical prostatectomy (RP), brachytherapy or external beam radiation therapy (RT), or primary androgen deprivation therapy or chose watchful waiting. To test the associations of intensity in PSA surveillance with study outcomes, we used a 2-year landmark analysis to assess whether the number of PSA tests during the first 2 years after treatment was associated with earlier detection of BCR, prostate cancer-related mortality, and all-cause mortality. We used landmark analysis to assess the association of PSA intensity, adjusting for clinicopathologic covariate, with outcome.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time for the entire cohort was 6.7 years. Higher Gleason score was the only clinicopathologic variable associated with higher PSA frequency in multivariable analysis for both the RP and RT groups (P value of .001 and .05, respectively). After adjustment for other covariates, the frequency of PSA tests during the first 2 years after RP did not increase the ability to detect BCR (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.19) or all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.30) in the landmark analysis.

CONCLUSION

Higher intensity of PSA surveillance during the 2 years after RP or RT did not improve earlier detection of BCR or survival. Evidence-based guidelines for PSA surveillance after primary treatment are needed.

摘要

目的

确定前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)监测强度是否与生化复发(BCR)或生存的早期检测相关。

患者和方法

我们确定了一个基于人群的队列,其中包括 832 名于 1995 年 1 月 1 日至 2006 年 7 月 31 日期间诊断为非转移性前列腺癌的男性。这些男性接受了根治性前列腺切除术(RP)、近距离放射治疗或外部束放射治疗(RT)、或原发雄激素剥夺治疗或选择观察等待。为了检验 PSA 监测强度与研究结果的关联,我们使用了 2 年的时间点分析来评估治疗后前 2 年内 PSA 检测次数是否与 BCR 的早期检测、前列腺癌相关死亡率和全因死亡率相关。我们使用时间点分析来评估 PSA 强度与结局的关联,同时调整临床病理协变量。

结果

整个队列的中位随访时间为 6.7 年。在 RP 和 RT 两组的多变量分析中,较高的 Gleason 评分是唯一与 PSA 频率较高相关的临床病理变量(P 值分别为<0.001 和<0.05)。在调整其他协变量后,RP 后前 2 年内 PSA 检测的频率并未增加检测 BCR 的能力(风险比,1.00;95%置信区间,0.84-1.19)或全因死亡率(风险比,0.95;95%置信区间,0.70-1.30)。

结论

在 RP 或 RT 后 2 年内增加 PSA 监测强度并未提高 BCR 或生存的早期检测。需要制定原发性治疗后 PSA 监测的循证指南。