Zeitlinger Markus, Rusca Antonio, Oraha Alhan Z, Gugliotta Barbara, Müller Markus, Ducharme Murray P
Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Jun;50(6):383-90. doi: 10.5414/cp201600.
To assess the relative bioavailability of diclofenac sodium hydroxypropyl β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD) administered via the subcutaneous (s.c.) and intramuscular (i.m.) route versus Voltaren® i.m. and to evaluate the dose linearity and pharmacokinetics of the s.c. formulation at three dose levels. Safety and local tolerability were also assessed.
One single-dose, randomized, three-way, crossover relative bioavailability study and one linearity single escalating dose, randomized, three-way cross-over pharmacokinetic study were conducted at two different clinical sites. A total of 42 healthy male and female subjects participated in both studies. Subjects received 75 mg/ml diclofenac sodium HPβCD (i.m. and s.c.) and Voltaren® 75 mg/3 ml (i.m.) in Study 1 and 25, 50, or 75 mg/ml diclofenac sodium HPβCD (s.c.) in Study 2.
Study 1 demonstrated bioequivalence of the s.c. test formulation with Voltaren® i.m. with respect to Cmax and AUC. Bioequivalence of the test i.m. with Voltaren® i.m. was also demonstrated (except the upper limit of the 90% confidence interval (CI) for Cmax which marginally exceeded the 80 - 125% range (125.78%)). Study 2 demonstrated that after s.c. administration of the test formulation, both Cmax and AUC are linearly related to the tested diclofenac doses. All tested doses were safe and locally well-tolerated with no serious adverse events reported.
Bioequivalence of diclofenac HPβCD 75 mg/ml after s.c. and i.m. administration with Voltaren® i.m. was demonstrated, except for the marginal deviation in Cmax when comparing the i.m. test and Voltaren®. Linearity was also demonstrated for the three doses intended for marketing.
评估双氯芬酸钠羟丙基β - 环糊精(HPβCD)经皮下(s.c.)和肌肉注射(i.m.)途径给药相对于扶他林®肌肉注射的相对生物利用度,并评估皮下制剂在三个剂量水平下的剂量线性和药代动力学。同时评估安全性和局部耐受性。
在两个不同临床地点进行了一项单剂量、随机、三交叉相对生物利用度研究和一项线性单剂量递增、随机、三交叉药代动力学研究。共有42名健康男性和女性受试者参与了这两项研究。在研究1中,受试者接受75 mg/ml双氯芬酸钠HPβCD(肌肉注射和皮下注射)和扶他林®75 mg/3 ml(肌肉注射),在研究2中,受试者接受25、50或75 mg/ml双氯芬酸钠HPβCD(皮下注射)。
研究1表明,皮下试验制剂与扶他林®肌肉注射在Cmax和AUC方面具有生物等效性。试验肌肉注射制剂与扶他林®肌肉注射也具有生物等效性(除Cmax的90%置信区间(CI)上限略超过80 - 125%范围(125.78%))。研究2表明,皮下注射试验制剂后,Cmax和AUC均与受试双氯芬酸剂量呈线性相关。所有受试剂量均安全且局部耐受性良好,未报告严重不良事件。
证明了75 mg/ml双氯芬酸HPβCD皮下和肌肉注射与扶他林®肌肉注射具有生物等效性,但比较肌肉注射试验制剂和扶他林®时Cmax存在轻微偏差。同时也证明了拟上市的三个剂量具有线性关系。