Suppr超能文献

静脉注射和肌肉注射 HPβCD-双氯芬酸(地来昔布)与其他双氯芬酸制剂的单剂量和多剂量药代动力学及剂量比例关系。

Single-dose and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of intravenous and intramuscular HPβCD-diclofenac (Dyloject) compared with other diclofenac formulations.

机构信息

Javelin Pharmaceuticals (now Hospira, Inc.), Cambridge, Massachusetts; The Leviathan Biopharma Group, Inc., Oncolupta, Inc., Newton, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2013 Oct;33(10):1012-21. doi: 10.1002/phar.1304. Epub 2013 Jun 6.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate single- and repeated-dose pharmacokinetics (PK) and dose proportionality of hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD)-diclofenac compared with Voltarol after intravenous (IV) and intramuscular (IM) administration.

DESIGN

Study 1: Single-dose randomized four-way crossover study. Study 2: Multiple-dose randomized three-way crossover study.

SETTING

Clinical research center.

SUBJECTS

Healthy adult volunteers.

INTERVENTION

Study 1: Subjects received HPβCD-diclofenac and Voltarol, IV and IM, with a 5-day washout between treatment periods. Study 2: Subjects received two doses of IV HPβCD-diclofenac and oral Cataflam once every 6 hours for four doses with a 48-hour washout period between treatment periods.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Study 1: IV HPβCD-diclofenac had a higher peak plasma concentration (Cmax ) and earlier time to reach maximum plasma concentration (Tmax ), but equivalent plasma exposure (area under the curve from time zero to t [AUC0-t ]) to IV Voltarol. The geometric mean ratio of HPβCD-diclofenac (IV) to Voltarol (IV) for AUC0-t was 106.27%. The geometric mean ratio of HPβCD-diclofenac (IM) to Voltarol (IM) for AUC0-t was 110.91%. The geometric mean ratio of HPβCD-diclofenac (IV) to HPβCD-diclofenac (IM) for AUC0-t was 101.25%. The geometric mean ratio of HPβCD-diclofenac (IM) to Voltarol (IV) for AUC0-t was 104.96%. Study 2: Cmax for diclofenac was 2904 and 6031 ng/ml after the first IV dose of 18.75 and 37.5 mg HPβCD-diclofenac, respectively, and was 3090 and 5617 ng/ml after the fourth dose, indicating no accumulation. Plasma exposures to 18.75 mg (866 ng·hour/ml) and 37.5 mg (1843 ng·hour/ml) IV HPβCD-diclofenac bracketed that of oral Cataflam 50 mg (1473 ng·hour/ml).

CONCLUSIONS

Study 1: Bioavailability in terms of AUC after IV administration was equivalent for HPβCD-diclofenac compared with Voltarol and after IM administration of HPβCD-diclofenac and Voltarol. Bioavailability in terms of AUC after IM administration of HPβCD-diclofenac was equivalent to IV administration of HPβCD-diclofenac and IV administration of Voltarol. Study 2: HPβCD-diclofenac showed dose proportionality after single- and multiple-dose administration and no accumulation of HPβCD-diclofenac. HPβCD-diclofenac was safe and well tolerated following IV and IM administration.

摘要

研究目的

评估羟丙基-β-环糊精(HPβCD)-双氯芬酸单次和多次给药的药代动力学(PK)和剂量比例性,与静脉(IV)和肌肉内(IM)给予的扶他林相比。

设计

研究 1:单剂量随机四交叉研究。研究 2:多剂量随机三交叉研究。

地点

临床研究中心。

受试者

健康成年志愿者。

干预措施

研究 1:受试者接受 HPβCD-双氯芬酸和扶他林,IV 和 IM,每个治疗期之间有 5 天的洗脱期。研究 2:受试者每 6 小时接受两次 IV HPβCD-双氯芬酸和口服 Cataflam,共 4 次,每个治疗期之间有 48 小时的洗脱期。

测量和主要结果

研究 1:IV HPβCD-双氯芬酸具有更高的峰血浆浓度(Cmax)和更早达到最大血浆浓度的时间(Tmax),但与 IV 扶他林的血浆暴露(从时间零到 t 的曲线下面积[AUC0-t])相当。AUC0-t 的 HPβCD-双氯芬酸(IV)与扶他林(IV)的几何均数比值为 106.27%。AUC0-t 的 HPβCD-双氯芬酸(IM)与扶他林(IM)的几何均数比值为 110.91%。AUC0-t 的 HPβCD-双氯芬酸(IV)与 HPβCD-双氯芬酸(IM)的几何均数比值为 101.25%。AUC0-t 的 HPβCD-双氯芬酸(IM)与扶他林(IV)的几何均数比值为 104.96%。研究 2:首次给予 18.75 和 37.5mg HPβCD-双氯芬酸的 IV 剂量后,双氯芬酸的 Cmax 分别为 2904 和 6031ng/ml,第四次剂量后分别为 3090 和 5617ng/ml,表明无蓄积。18.75mg(866ng·小时/ml)和 37.5mg(1843ng·小时/ml)IV HPβCD-双氯芬酸的血浆暴露量与口服 Cataflam 50mg(1473ng·小时/ml)相当。

结论

研究 1:IV 给予 HPβCD-双氯芬酸的 AUC 生物利用度与扶他林相当,IM 给予 HPβCD-双氯芬酸和扶他林的 AUC 生物利用度也相当。IM 给予 HPβCD-双氯芬酸的 AUC 生物利用度与 IV 给予 HPβCD-双氯芬酸和 IV 给予扶他林相当。研究 2:单次和多次给药后,HPβCD-双氯芬酸显示出剂量比例性,且无 HPβCD-双氯芬酸蓄积。IV 和 IM 给予 HPβCD-双氯芬酸均安全且耐受良好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验