Minutilli Ettore, Feliciani Claudio
Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome,
Tumori. 2012 Mar-Apr;98(2):185-90. doi: 10.1177/030089161209800202.
High-dose interferon-alpha remains the first-line treatment in the adjuvant therapy of metastatic melanoma. More recently, high-dose pegylated interferon-alpha-2b has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Actually, an adjuvant therapy alternative to high-dose interferon-alpha is represented by ipilimumab. Moreover, combination therapy of IFN-alpha or ipilimumab with tyrosine kinase inhibitors has been proved in patients with specific mutations. It is mandatory to understand what the best adjuvant treatment is for resected metastatic melanoma patients, particularly at stage III-N1, in terms of overall survival rather than recurrence-free survival. The ECOG 1609 clinical trial compared high-dose interferon-alpha and ipilimumab alone or combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of early metastatic melanoma. In the past, ECOG 1684, 1690 and 1694 trials showed improvement in recurrence-free survival more than overall survival for high-risk melanoma patients (stage IIB-III) treated with high-dose interferon-alpha, whereas more recently the EORTC 18991 trial reported successful therapeutic results in terms of recurrence-free survival rather than overall survival for stage III-N1 melanoma patients treated with high-dose pegylated interferon-alpha-2b. Toxicity was more acceptable within one year of treatment. Randomized trials have demonstrated that ipilimumab as second-line therapy is able to increase dose-dependent overall survival rates in advanced melanoma patients despite severe but reversible immune-related adverse events. Old tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been used in combination with interferon for the treatment of advanced melanoma patients with moderate benefits and increased toxicity, but new selective drugs seem to be more efficacious. Early metastatic melanoma patients (stage III-N1) should be the principal subset to be treated with the most suitable adjuvant therapy to achieve the best overall survival. New schedules have to be tested with high-dose interferon-alpha and ipilimumab alone or combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors while waiting for results from ECOG 1609.
大剂量干扰素-α仍然是转移性黑色素瘤辅助治疗的一线疗法。最近,大剂量聚乙二醇化干扰素-α-2b已获美国食品药品监督管理局批准。实际上,伊匹单抗是大剂量干扰素-α的一种辅助治疗替代方案。此外,对于特定突变的患者,已证实干扰素-α或伊匹单抗与酪氨酸激酶抑制剂联合治疗有效。必须明确对于已切除的转移性黑色素瘤患者,尤其是III-N1期患者,就总生存期而非无复发生存期而言,最佳的辅助治疗方法是什么。ECOG 1609临床试验比较了大剂量干扰素-α、伊匹单抗单独使用或与酪氨酸激酶抑制剂联合使用治疗早期转移性黑色素瘤的效果。过去,ECOG 1684、1690和1694试验表明,大剂量干扰素-α治疗高危黑色素瘤患者(IIB-III期)时,无复发生存期的改善超过总生存期,而最近EORTC 18991试验报告称,大剂量聚乙二醇化干扰素-α-2b治疗III-N1期黑色素瘤患者时,在无复发生存期而非总生存期方面取得了成功的治疗效果。治疗一年内毒性更易接受。随机试验表明,尽管存在严重但可逆的免疫相关不良事件,伊匹单抗作为二线治疗能够提高晚期黑色素瘤患者剂量依赖性的总生存率。旧的酪氨酸激酶抑制剂曾与干扰素联合用于治疗晚期黑色素瘤患者,疗效中等但毒性增加,而新型选择性药物似乎更有效。早期转移性黑色素瘤患者(III-N1期)应是接受最合适辅助治疗以实现最佳总生存期的主要亚组。在等待ECOG 1609结果的同时,必须对大剂量干扰素-α、伊匹单抗单独使用或与酪氨酸激酶抑制剂联合使用的新方案进行测试。