Suppr超能文献

天仙子胺与阿米替林治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征的多中心、开放标签、非劣效性、随机对照研究。

Tianeptine vs amitriptyline for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea: a multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized controlled study.

机构信息

Departments of Gastroenterology, Hanyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 Sep;24(9):860-e398. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01945.x. Epub 2012 Jun 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tricyclic antidepressants have good efficacy in irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D), but their clinical use is limited by considerations of tolerability. Tianeptine, another antidepressant, acts as a selective serotonin reuptake enhancer. We compared tianeptine with amitriptyline for the treatment of patients with IBS-D.

METHODS

We undertook a multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority clinical study that compared tianeptine with amitriptyline, each in combination with probiotics, for the treatment of IBS-D. Subjects were randomized to receive tianeptine (37.5 mg)/probiotics (Bacillus subtilis + Streptococcus faecium) or amitriptyline (10 mg)/probiotics (Bacillus subtilis + Streptococcus faecium) for 4 weeks. A total of 228 patients were analyzed by the intention-to-treat approach. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who had global relief of IBS symptoms at week 4. The secondary efficacy endpoints were intensity of abdominal pain/discomfort, stool frequency/consistency, quality of life, and overall satisfaction with treatment.

KEY RESULTS

At week 4, non-inferiority of the tianeptine group to the amitriptyline group (treatment difference -15.1%; 95% CI -26.6% to -3.8%) was shown, with 81.1% (99 of 122 patients) of the patients in the tianeptine group and 66.0% (70 of 106 patients) in the amitriptyline group reporting global relief of IBS symptoms. The secondary endpoints also demonstrated non-inferiority of the tianeptine group to the amitriptyline group. Adverse events such as dry mouth and constipation were significantly lower in the tianeptine group than the amitriptyline group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Tianeptine is not inferior to amitriptyline for treating IBS-D in terms of both efficacy and tolerability.

摘要

背景

三环类抗抑郁药在腹泻型肠易激综合征(IBS-D)中具有良好的疗效,但由于耐受性的考虑,其临床应用受到限制。另一种抗抑郁药,噻奈普汀,作为一种选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取增强剂。我们比较了噻奈普汀与阿米替林治疗 IBS-D 患者。

方法

我们进行了一项多中心、随机、开放标签、非劣效性临床研究,比较了噻奈普汀与阿米替林联合益生菌治疗 IBS-D 的疗效。受试者随机接受噻奈普汀(37.5mg)/益生菌(枯草芽孢杆菌+屎肠球菌)或阿米替林(10mg)/益生菌(枯草芽孢杆菌+屎肠球菌)治疗 4 周。共有 228 例患者按意向治疗分析。主要疗效终点是第 4 周时 IBS 症状整体缓解的患者比例。次要疗效终点为腹痛/不适强度、排便频率/一致性、生活质量和治疗总体满意度。

主要结果

第 4 周时,噻奈普汀组与阿米替林组的非劣效性(治疗差异-15.1%;95%CI-26.6%至-3.8%)得到证实,噻奈普汀组 81.1%(122 例患者中的 99 例)和阿米替林组 66.0%(106 例患者中的 70 例)患者报告 IBS 症状整体缓解。次要终点也表明噻奈普汀组与阿米替林组无差异。噻奈普汀组口干和便秘等不良反应明显低于阿米替林组(P<0.05)。

结论

噻奈普汀在疗效和耐受性方面均不劣于阿米替林治疗 IBS-D。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验