Suppr超能文献

[晚期非小细胞肺癌三线治疗的疗效与生存分析]

[Analysis of the efficacy and survival of third-line treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer].

作者信息

Shao Lan, Song Zhengbo, Hu Lin, Xie Fajun, Lou Guangyuan, Hong Wei, Gu Cuiping, Hong Dan, Lin Baochai, Zhang Yiping

机构信息

Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, the Second Clinical Medical College, Hangzhou 310053, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2012 Jun;15(6):369-74. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2012.06.08.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The appearance of highly effective and low toxic drugs enables an increasing number of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients to receive third-line therapy. No other standard choice for third-line therapy aside from erlotinib is possible. This study respectively explores the efficacy and safety of single chemotherapy, epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), and doublet chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC third-line treatment.

METHODS

This study included 115 NSCLC patients in the stage IIIb or IV who were retrospectively reviewed to investigate the differences of survival time between different treatments. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted based on the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional-hazards model.

RESULTS

The median progression free survival (PFS) values in the single agent, EGFR-TKIs and doublet groups were 2.30, 3.17 and 2.37 months, respectively (P=0.045). The median overall survival from the initiation of the third-line treatment were 8.00, 10.40 and 7.87 months in the three groups (P=0.110). The rates of stage III-IV toxicities were 33.3%, 18.2% and 68.8% (P<0.001), respectively. After the third-line treatment, the PFS was significantly increased in patients with a performance status (PS) of 0 to 1 (P<0.001), and the survival time was prolonged in patients who never smoke (P=0.011), have good PS (P<0.001), and have disease control after both first- and second-line treatments (P=0.044) using multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Advanced NSCLC patients who never smoke, have good PS scores, and have good disease control from the first- and second-line therapies could benefit more in third-line treatment. EGFR-TKIs therapy showed increased PFS compared with single and doublet agents.

摘要

背景与目的

高效低毒药物的出现使得越来越多的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者能够接受三线治疗。除厄洛替尼外,三线治疗没有其他标准选择。本研究分别探讨了单药化疗、表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)及联合化疗在晚期NSCLC三线治疗中的疗效和安全性。

方法

本研究纳入了115例Ⅲb或Ⅳ期NSCLC患者,对其进行回顾性分析,以研究不同治疗方法之间生存时间的差异。基于Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险模型进行单因素和多因素分析。

结果

单药组、EGFR-TKIs组和联合化疗组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为2.30、3.17和2.37个月(P = 0.045)。三组从三线治疗开始的中位总生存期分别为8.00、10.40和7.87个月(P = 0.110)。Ⅲ-Ⅳ级毒性发生率分别为33.3%、18.2%和68.8%(P<0.001)。三线治疗后,体能状态(PS)为0至1的患者PFS显著延长(P<0.001),从不吸烟的患者生存时间延长(P = 0.011),PS良好的患者生存时间延长(P<0.001),一线和二线治疗后病情得到控制的患者生存时间延长(P = 0.044)(多因素分析)。

结论

从不吸烟、PS评分良好且一线和二线治疗病情控制良好的晚期NSCLC患者在三线治疗中获益更多。与单药和联合化疗相比,EGFR-TKIs治疗的PFS有所增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15d9/6000300/7b94ffca5461/zgfazz-15-6-369-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验