Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, St Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Oct;26(5):799-803. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2012.04.016. Epub 2012 Jun 9.
This study tested the hypothesis that there is a discrepancy between global hemodynamic parameters and microvascular flow in patients before and after successful elective electrical cardioversion (ECV) for atrial fibrillation (AF).
Prospective observational study.
Preanesthesia holding area in a teaching hospital.
Adult patients who underwent successful elective ECV for AF.
ECV.
Routine measurements of heart rate and noninvasive blood pressure were recorded and the sublingual microcirculation was visualized by sidestream darkfield imaging before and after the conversion of AF to sinus rhythm by elective ECV. The conversion to sinus rhythm significantly improved the microvascular flow index for smaller and larger microvessels. For smaller microvessels, perfused vessel density did not reach significance after conversion to sinus rhythm, whereas the proportion of perfused vessels was significantly larger and indices of heterogeneity for microvascular flow index decreased significantly. No correlation could be identified for the changes in mean blood pressure, perfused vessel density, and microvascular flow index for smaller microvessels.
Successful ECV in patients with AF improves indices of sublingual microvascular perfusion. This change has no clear relation to the change in blood pressure and cannot be predicted from it. It may be prudent not to rely solely on global hemodynamic parameters to assess end-organ perfusion in this setting.
本研究旨在检验下述假设,即在成功择期电复律(ECV)转复心房颤动(AF)前后,患者的整体血液动力学参数与微血管血流存在差异。
前瞻性观察性研究。
教学医院的麻醉前等待区。
接受成功择期 ECV 治疗 AF 的成年患者。
ECV。
在通过择期 ECV 成功转复 AF 为窦性心律前后,记录了心率和无创血压的常规测量值,并通过边流暗场成像观察舌下微循环。转复为窦性心律后,微血管血流指数显著改善了小血管和大血管的血流。对于小血管,转复为窦性心律后,灌注血管密度没有达到统计学意义,但灌注血管的比例显著增大,微血管血流指数的异质性指数显著降低。平均血压、灌注血管密度和小血管的微血管血流指数的变化之间没有相关性。
在 AF 患者中成功进行 ECV 可改善舌下微循环的灌注指数。这种变化与血压变化没有明确关系,也无法从血压变化中预测。在这种情况下,谨慎起见,可能不宜仅依靠整体血液动力学参数来评估终末器官灌注。