Philips Group Innovation, Research, Brain, Body & Behavior Group. High Tech Campus 34, 5656AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Biol Psychol. 2012 Sep;91(1):128-41. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.05.011. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
The literature shows large inconsistencies in respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) responses to induced emotional states. This may be caused by differences in emotion induction methods, RSA quantification, and non-emotional demands of the situation. In 83 healthy subjects, we studied RSA responses to pictures and film fragments eliciting six different discrete emotions relative to neutral baseline stimuli. RSA responses were quantified in the time and frequency domain and were additionally corrected for differences in mean heart rate and respiration rate, resulting in eight different RSA response measures. Subjective ratings of emotional stimuli and facial electromyographic responses indicated that pictures and film fragments elicited the intended emotions. Although RSA measures showed various emotional effects, responses were quite heterogeneous and frequently nonsignificant. They were substantially influenced by methodological factors, in particular time vs. frequency domain response measures, correction for changes in respiration rate, use of pictures vs. film fragments, and sex of participants.
文献表明,呼吸窦性心律失常(RSA)对诱发情绪状态的反应存在很大的不一致性。这可能是由于情绪诱发方法、RSA 量化以及情况的非情绪需求的差异造成的。在 83 名健康受试者中,我们研究了相对于中性基线刺激的六张不同离散情绪图片和电影片段引起的 RSA 反应。RSA 反应在时域和频域进行量化,并对平均心率和呼吸率的差异进行了校正,从而得到了八种不同的 RSA 反应测量。主观情绪刺激评分和面部肌电图反应表明,图片和电影片段引发了预期的情绪。尽管 RSA 测量显示出各种情绪效应,但反应非常多样化,且经常不显著。它们受到方法学因素的很大影响,特别是时间与频域反应测量、呼吸率变化的校正、图片与电影片段的使用以及参与者的性别。