University of Oregon, United States.
Biol Psychol. 2012 Mar;89(3):562-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.12.022. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
The current study explored the effects of talking on respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) during a semi-structured emotional interview (Adult Attachment Interview) using 76 female undergraduates. The effectiveness of 2 different methodological approaches (i.e. talking baseline or transfer function) was explored as respiratory control during talking tasks. RSA was collected during resting baseline, talking baseline, and interview conditions. Subjective reports of distress were higher in the interview than in the other 2 conditions. Mean RSA levels were significantly lower in the 2 talking tasks than in the resting baseline. After applying a transfer function for respiratory control, there were no significant differences between the 3 conditions. Moderator analyses yielded lower RSA values in the talking baseline and interview conditions for participants who reported greater distress during the interview. It was concluded that respiratory controls are likely necessary when using RSA in talking paradigms and that both approaches appeared to be adequate.
当前的研究探讨了在使用 76 名女性本科生的半结构化情感访谈(成人依恋访谈)中交谈对呼吸窦性心律失常(RSA)的影响。探讨了两种不同方法学方法(即谈话基线或传递函数)的有效性,作为谈话任务期间的呼吸控制。在休息基线、谈话基线和访谈条件下采集 RSA。与其他 2 种条件相比,访谈中的主观痛苦报告更高。在 2 个谈话任务中,RSA 水平明显低于休息基线。应用呼吸控制传递函数后,3 种条件之间没有显著差异。调节分析得出,对于在访谈中报告更大痛苦的参与者,在谈话基线和访谈条件下的 RSA 值更低。结论是,在谈话范式中使用 RSA 时,可能需要进行呼吸控制,并且这两种方法似乎都是有效的。