• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在儿科异基因造血干细胞移植受者的预处理中,每日两次静脉注射 BU 的药代动力学和安全性。

The pharmacokinetics and safety of twice daily i.v. BU during conditioning in pediatric allo-SCT recipients.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Jan;48(1):19-25. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.105. Epub 2012 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1038/bmt.2012.105
PMID:22684047
Abstract

Intravenous BU divided four times daily (q6 h) has been shown to be safe and effective in pediatric allo-SCT recipients. Though less frequent dosing is desirable, pharmacokinetic (PK) data on twice daily (q12 h) i.v. BU administration in pediatric allo-SCT recipients is limited. We prospectively examined the PK results in a cohort of pediatric allo-SCT recipients receiving i.v. BU q12 h as part of conditioning before allo-SCT. BU levels were obtained after the first dose of conditioning. PK parameter analysis (n=49) yielded the following 95% confidence intervals (CI₉₅): weight-normalized volume of distribution: 0.65-0.73 L/kg; t(1/2): 122-147 min; weight-normalized clearance (CL(n)): 3.4-4.3 mL/min/kg; and area under the curve: 1835-2180 mmol × min/L. From these results, a steady state concentration was calculated with CI₉₅ between 628-746 ng/mL. Comparison between recipients ≤4 vs >4 years old revealed significant differences in t(1/2) (mean: 115 vs 146 min, P=0.008) and CL(n) (mean: 4.4 vs 3.5 mL/min/kg, P=0.038). Intravenous BU q12 h had a comparable PK to i.v. BU q6 h PK seen in the literature, and in pediatric allo-SCT recipients, is a feasible, attractive alternative to i.v. q6h dosing.

摘要

静脉注射 BU 每日四次(q6h)已被证明在儿科 allo-SCT 受者中是安全有效的。虽然更频繁的给药是理想的,但在儿科 allo-SCT 受者中,每日两次(q12h)静脉注射 BU 的药代动力学(PK)数据有限。我们前瞻性地检查了接受 allo-SCT 前作为预处理的一部分接受每日两次静脉注射 BU(q12h)的儿科 allo-SCT 受者队列中的 PK 结果。在第一次预处理剂量后获得 BU 水平。PK 参数分析(n=49)得出以下 95%置信区间(CI₉₅):体重归一化分布容积:0.65-0.73 L/kg;半衰期(t(1/2)):122-147 min;体重归一化清除率(CL(n)):3.4-4.3 mL/min/kg;和曲线下面积:1835-2180 mmol × min/L。根据这些结果,计算出稳态浓度的 CI₉₅在 628-746 ng/mL 之间。≤4 岁和>4 岁受者之间的比较显示 t(1/2)(平均值:115 与 146 min,P=0.008)和 CL(n)(平均值:4.4 与 3.5 mL/min/kg,P=0.038)有显著差异。静脉注射 BU q12h 的 PK 与文献中静脉注射 BU q6h PK 相当,在儿科 allo-SCT 受者中,是静脉注射 q6h 给药的可行且有吸引力的替代方案。

相似文献

1
The pharmacokinetics and safety of twice daily i.v. BU during conditioning in pediatric allo-SCT recipients.在儿科异基因造血干细胞移植受者的预处理中,每日两次静脉注射 BU 的药代动力学和安全性。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Jan;48(1):19-25. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.105. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
2
Pharmacokinetics of a test dose of intravenous busulfan guide dose modifications to achieve an optimal area under the curve of a single daily dose of intravenous busulfan in children undergoing a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.静脉注射白消安试验剂量的药代动力学指导剂量调整,以在接受造血干细胞移植的低强度预处理方案的儿童中实现每日单次静脉注射白消安的最佳曲线下面积。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006 Apr;12(4):472-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.12.028.
3
Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan in children undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.儿童异基因造血干细胞移植中静脉用白消安的安全性、疗效和药代动力学。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010 Feb;54(2):291-8. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22227.
4
I.V. busulfan in pediatrics: a novel dosing to improve safety/efficacy for hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation recipients.儿科静脉注射白消安:一种改善造血干细胞移植受者安全性/疗效的新型给药方案。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004 May;33(10):979-87. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704446.
5
Development and validation of a test dose strategy for once-daily i.v. busulfan: importance of fixed infusion rate dosing.开发并验证了一种每日一次静脉注射白消安的测试剂量策略:固定输注率给药的重要性。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Feb;18(2):295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.07.015. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
6
Once-daily intravenous busulfan with therapeutic drug monitoring compared to conventional oral busulfan improves survival and engraftment in children undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation.与传统口服白消安相比,每日一次静脉注射白消安并进行治疗药物监测可提高接受异基因干细胞移植儿童的生存率和植入率。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008 Jan;14(1):88-98. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.09.015.
7
Pharmacokinetics of once-daily IV busulfan as part of pretransplantation preparative regimens: a comparison with an every 6-hour dosing schedule.作为移植前预处理方案一部分的每日一次静脉注射白消安的药代动力学:与每6小时给药方案的比较。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007 Jan;13(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2006.08.037.
8
New insights into the pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan in children with sickle cell anemia undergoing bone marrow transplantation.镰状细胞贫血患儿接受骨髓移植时静脉注射白消安的药代动力学新见解。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015 Apr;62(4):680-6. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25376. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
9
Incidence of Viral and fungal infections following busulfan-based reduced-intensity versus myeloablative conditioning in pediatric allogeneic stem cell transplantation recipients.基于白消安的减低强度与清髓性预处理在儿科异基因造血干细胞移植受者中病毒和真菌感染的发生率。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Dec;15(12):1587-95. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.08.006. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
10
A phase II trial of liposomal busulphan as an intravenous myeloablative agent prior to stem cell transplantation: 500 mg/m(2) as a optimal total dose for conditioning.一项关于脂质体白消安作为干细胞移植前静脉内骨髓消融剂的II期试验:500 mg/m(2)作为预处理的最佳总剂量。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002 Dec;30(12):833-41. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703739.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical pharmacology of cytotoxic drugs in neonates and infants: Providing evidence-based dosing guidance.新生儿和婴儿细胞毒药物的临床药理学:提供基于证据的剂量指导。
Eur J Cancer. 2022 Mar;164:137-154. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
2
Review of the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous Busulfan in Paediatric Patients.静脉用白消安在儿科患者中的药代动力学和药效学评价。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2021 Jan;60(1):17-51. doi: 10.1007/s40262-020-00947-2. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
3
Test Dose Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients Receiving Once-Daily IV Busulfan Conditioning for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant: A Reliable Approach?
每日一次静脉注射白消安预处理的儿科患者的测试剂量药代动力学:可靠的方法?
J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;58(3):332-339. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1049. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
4
New frontiers in pediatric Allo-SCT.儿科异基因造血干细胞移植的新前沿
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014 Sep;49(9):1139-45. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2014.89. Epub 2014 May 12.
5
Reduced toxicity, myeloablative conditioning with BU, fludarabine, alemtuzumab and SCT from sibling donors in children with sickle cell disease.镰状细胞病患儿采用白消安、氟达拉滨、阿仑单抗进行减毒清髓预处理及同胞供体造血干细胞移植的毒性降低情况。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014 Jul;49(7):913-20. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2014.84. Epub 2014 May 5.
6
A comparison of bronchoalveolar lavage versus lung biopsy in pediatric recipients after stem cell transplantation.干细胞移植后儿科受者支气管肺泡灌洗与肺活检的比较
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Aug;20(8):1229-37. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.04.019. Epub 2014 Apr 23.