Suppr超能文献

在一家三级医疗中心接受佐他莫司洗脱支架治疗的患者中的性别差异。

Gender differences in patients treated with the zotarolimus-eluting stent at a tertiary medical center.

作者信息

Shammas Nicolas W, Shammas Gail A, Lemke Jon, Miller Sue, Meriner Susan

机构信息

Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Davenport, IA 52803, USA.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Jun;24(6):256-60.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gender-related differences in long-term outcomes of patients receiving the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) (Medtronic) have not been well defined. In this study, we evaluate the differences between men (M) and women (W) for 2-year target vessel failure (TVF) in an unselected consecutive series of patients treated with the ZES at our institution.

METHODS

Data on 197 consecutive patients (133 M, 64 W) stented with the ZES were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint of the study was to compare gender-related outcomes in TVF, defined as the combined endpoint of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Secondary endpoints included TLR, TVR, acute stent thrombosis (ST) as defined by the academic research consortium (ARC), and cardiac death. The cine angiograms of the first consecutive 122 patients (79 M, 43 W) were independently reviewed by a cardiologist blinded to clinical outcome and SYNTAX scoring was performed. Follow-up was achieved using medical records and/or phone calls and was censored at 730 days. Descriptive analysis was performed on all variables. Univariate analysis compared the M and W cohorts. Logistic regression analysis modeling for predictors of TVF was performed and survival analysis between the 2 groups was plotted.

RESULTS

The 2 groups were well matched for demographic, clinical, angiographic, and procedural variables. Angiographic complexity was also statistically similar between the 2 groups as judged by SYNTAX scoring (15.8 ± 10.9 M vs 13.5 ± 8.3 W; P=.197). At 2-year follow-up, TVF was 22.6% and 32.8% (P=.684) with no statistical difference between TLR (18.1% M vs 12.8% W), TVR (21.8% M vs 32.8% W), cardiac death (2.3% M vs 6.3% W), and definite and probable stent thrombosis (2.26% M vs 3.13% W). Logistic regression analyses modeling for age, gender, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, non-left main (LM) bifurcation lesions, ostial lesions, trifurcating LM, and pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) lesion severity showed that a higher NYHA class (odds ratio [OR], 2.68; P=.005), ostial lesions (OR, 5.68; P<.001), bifurcating non-LM lesions (OR, 2.74; P=.015), and trifurcating LM lesions (OR, 28.24; P<.001) predicted a higher TVF. Female gender (P=.086) and age (P=.09) were not independent predictors of TVF.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of patients receiving ZES, men and women had similar outcomes at 2-year follow-up consistent with recent reports in the current era of PCI. Complex coronary anatomy (ostial, non-LM bifurcations, and LM trifurcations) and advanced heart failure were stronger predictors of higher TVF than gender and age.

摘要

背景

接受安进佐他莫司洗脱支架(ZES,美敦力公司)治疗的患者长期预后的性别差异尚未明确界定。在本研究中,我们评估了在我们机构接受ZES治疗的未选择连续系列患者中,男性(M)和女性(W)在2年靶血管失败(TVF)方面的差异。

方法

对197例连续接受ZES支架置入术的患者(133例男性,64例女性)的数据进行回顾性分析。本研究的主要终点是比较TVF中与性别相关的预后,TVF定义为心脏死亡、非致命性心肌梗死和靶血管血运重建(TVR)的联合终点。次要终点包括靶病变血运重建(TLR)、TVR、学术研究联盟(ARC)定义的急性支架血栓形成(ST)和心脏死亡。由一位对临床结局不知情的心内科医生对最初连续的122例患者(79例男性,43例女性)的血管造影影片进行独立审查,并进行SYNTAX评分。通过病历和/或电话进行随访,并在730天时进行截尾。对所有变量进行描述性分析。单因素分析比较了男性和女性队列。进行了TVF预测因素的逻辑回归分析建模,并绘制了两组之间的生存分析图。

结果

两组在人口统计学、临床、血管造影和手术变量方面匹配良好。根据SYNTAX评分判断,两组之间的血管造影复杂性在统计学上也相似(男性15.8±10.9 vs女性13.5±8.3;P = 0.197)。在2年随访时,TVF分别为22.6%和32.8%(P = 0.684),TLR(男性18.1% vs女性12.8%)、TVR(男性21.8% vs女性32.8%)、心脏死亡(男性2.3% vs女性6.3%)以及明确和可能的支架血栓形成(男性2.26% vs女性3.13%)之间均无统计学差异。对年龄、性别、纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级、非左主干(LM)分叉病变、开口病变、LM三分叉病变以及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)前病变严重程度进行逻辑回归分析建模显示,较高的NYHA分级(比值比[OR],2.68;P = 0.005)、开口病变(OR,5.68;P < 0.001)、非LM分叉病变(OR,2.74;P = 0.015)和LM三分叉病变(OR,28.24;P < 0.001)预测TVF较高。女性性别(P = 0.086)和年龄(P = 0.09)不是TVF的独立预测因素。

结论

在这个接受ZES治疗的患者队列中,男性和女性在2年随访时预后相似,这与PCI当代的近期报道一致。复杂的冠状动脉解剖结构(开口、非LM分叉和LM三分叉)和晚期心力衰竭比性别和年龄更能预测较高的TVF。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验