Delirium in hospitalized patients: implications of current evidence on clinical practice and future avenues for research--a systematic evidence review.

BACKGROUND

Despite the significant burden of delirium among hospitalized adults, critical appraisal of systematic data on delirium diagnosis, pathophysiology, treatment, prevention, and outcomes is lacking.

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations for delirium care to practitioners, and identify gaps in delirium research.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) information systems from January 1966 to April 2011.

STUDY SELECTION

All published systematic evidence reviews (SERs) on delirium were evaluated.

DATA EXTRACTION

Three reviewers independently extracted the data regarding delirium risk factors, diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and outcomes, and critically appraised each SER as good, fair, or poor using the United States Preventive Services Task Force criteria.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twenty-two SERs graded as good or fair provided the data. Age, cognitive impairment, depression, anticholinergic drugs, and lorazepam use were associated with an increased risk for developing delirium. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) is reliable for delirium diagnosis outside of the intensive care unit. Multicomponent nonpharmacological interventions are effective in reducing delirium incidence in elderly medical patients. Low-dose haloperidol has similar efficacy as atypical antipsychotics for treating delirium. Delirium is associated with poor outcomes independent of age, severity of illness, or dementia.

CONCLUSION

Delirium is an acute, preventable medical condition with short- and long-term negative effects on a patient's cognitive and functional states.