Department of Pharmacy and Health Systems Sciences, Bouve College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Aging Brain Center, Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Dec;68(12):2921-2926. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16844. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
Methods for pharmacoepidemiologic studies of large-scale data repositories are established. Although clinical cohorts of older adults often contain critical information to advance our understanding of medication risk and benefit, the methods best suited to manage medication data in these samples are sometimes unclear and their degree of validation unknown. We sought to provide researchers, in the context of a clinical cohort study of delirium in older adults, with guidance on the methodological tools to use data from clinical cohorts to better understand medication risk factors and outcomes.
Prospective cohort study.
The Successful Aging After Elective Surgery (SAGES) prospective cohort.
A total of 560 older adults (aged ≥70 years) without dementia undergoing elective major surgery.
Using the SAGES clinical cohort, methods used to characterize medications were identified, reviewed, analyzed, and distinguished by appropriateness and degree of validation for characterizing pharmacoepidemiologic data in smaller clinical data sets.
Medication coding is essential; the American Hospital Formulary System, most often used in the United States, is not preferred over others. Use of equivalent dosing scales (e.g., morphine equivalents) for a single medication class (e.g., opioids) is preferred over multiclass analgesic equivalency scales. Medication aggregation from the same class (e.g., benzodiazepines) is well established; the optimal prevalence breakout for aggregation remains unclear. Validated scale(s) to combine structurally dissimilar medications (e.g., anticholinergics) should be used with caution; a lack of consensus exists regarding the optimal scale. Directed acyclic graph(s) are an accepted method to conceptualize causative frameworks when identifying potential confounders. Modeling-based strategies should be used with evidence-based, a priori variable-selection strategies.
As highlighted in the SAGES cohort, the methods used to classify and analyze medication data in clinically rich cohort studies vary in the rigor by which they have been developed and validated.
建立大规模数据存储库的药物流行病学研究方法。虽然老年临床队列通常包含有助于深入了解药物风险和获益的关键信息,但有时不清楚最适合管理这些样本中药物数据的方法,也不知道这些方法的验证程度。我们希望为研究人员提供指导,在老年患者谵妄的临床队列研究背景下,提供使用临床队列数据更好地了解药物风险因素和结局的方法工具。
前瞻性队列研究。
择期手术术后成功老龄化(SAGES)前瞻性队列。
共纳入 560 例年龄≥70 岁、无痴呆且接受择期大手术的老年患者。
使用 SAGES 临床队列,确定、审查、分析并区分了用于描述药物的方法,这些方法的适宜性和对较小临床数据集药物流行病学数据的验证程度不同。
药物编码至关重要;在美国最常用的美国医院配方系统(American Hospital Formulary System)并不优于其他系统。对于单一药物类别(如阿片类药物),使用等效剂量刻度(如吗啡当量)优于多类镇痛等效刻度。同一类药物(如苯二氮䓬类)的药物聚集是成熟的;聚合的最佳流行率尚不清楚。应谨慎使用针对结构不同的药物(如抗胆碱能药物)的经过验证的刻度;对于最佳刻度,尚未达成共识。有向无环图(Directed acyclic graph)是识别潜在混杂因素时构建因果框架的一种公认方法。基于模型的策略应与基于证据的、先验变量选择策略一起使用。
正如 SAGES 队列所强调的,在临床丰富的队列研究中对药物数据进行分类和分析的方法在开发和验证的严格程度上有所不同。