Newsome G G, Tillman M H
Nurs Diagn. 1990 Jul-Sep;1(3):89-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.1990.tb00248.x.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of guided design and lecture teaching strategies on the clinical problem-solving performance of first quarter student nurses. The guided design treatment (written simulations and small group interaction) was selected especially with a view of developing new approaches to teaching nursing diagnosis. A total of 50 students, enrolled in Fundamentals of Nursing, were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: guided design and lecture. Each group received 10 hours of instruction. Treatment groups remained intact for 6 weeks of clinical practice following instruction. Recall knowledge of the nursing process was measured by an objective examination, and performance in problem solving was measured through the use of a care plan evaluation tool. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and t-tests. Students taught by guided design scored significantly higher than those taught by lecture in preparing a patient care plan for an actual patient and for a simulated patient. Knowledge of the nursing process as tested by an objective examination was not significantly different for the two treatment groups.
本研究的目的是比较引导式设计和讲授式教学策略对第一学期学生护士临床问题解决能力的影响。引导式设计教学法(书面模拟和小组互动)的选择尤其着眼于开发护理诊断教学的新方法。共有50名注册学习《护理学基础》的学生被随机分为两个治疗组:引导式设计组和讲授组。每组接受10小时的教学。教学结束后,治疗组在6周的临床实习中保持不变。通过客观考试测量护理程序的回忆知识,并使用护理计划评估工具测量问题解决能力。使用方差分析和t检验对数据进行分析。在为实际患者和模拟患者制定护理计划方面,接受引导式设计教学的学生得分显著高于接受讲授式教学的学生。两个治疗组通过客观考试测试的护理程序知识没有显著差异。