Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dev Psychol. 2013 Apr;49(4):672-89. doi: 10.1037/a0028793. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
Empirical research supporting the contention that insecure attachment is related to internalizing behaviors has been inconsistent. Across 60 studies including 5,236 families, we found a significant, small to medium effect size linking insecure attachment and internalizing behavior (observed d = .37, 95% CI [0.27, 0.46]; adjusted d = .19, 95% CI [0.09, 0.29]). Several moderator variables were associated with differences in effect size, including concurrent externalizing behavior, gender, how the disorganized category was treated, observation versus questionnaire measures of internalizing behavior, age of attachment assessment, time elapsed between attachment and internalizing measure, and year of publication. The association between avoidant attachment and internalizing behavior was also significant and small to moderate (d = .29, 95% CI [0.12, 0.45]). The effect sizes comparing resistant to secure attachment and resistant to avoidant attachment were not significant. In 20 studies with 2,679 families, we found a small effect size linking disorganized attachment and internalizing behavior (observed d = .20, 95% CI [0.09, 0.31]); however, the effect size was not significant when adjusted for probable publication bias (d = .12, 95% CI [-0.02, 0.23]). The existing literature supports the general notion that insecure attachment relationships in early life, particularly avoidant attachment, are associated with subsequent internalizing behaviors, although effect sizes are not strong.
实证研究支持这样一种观点,即不安全的依恋与内化行为有关,但这些研究的结果并不一致。在包括 5236 个家庭在内的 60 项研究中,我们发现不安全的依恋与内化行为之间存在显著的、小到中等的效应大小关系(观察到的 d =.37,95%置信区间 [0.27, 0.46];调整后的 d =.19,95%置信区间 [0.09, 0.29])。几个调节变量与效应大小的差异有关,包括同时存在的外化行为、性别、如何处理混乱类别、内化行为的观察与问卷测量、依恋评估的年龄、依恋评估和内化测量之间的时间间隔以及发表年份。回避型依恋与内化行为之间的关联也具有显著意义,且为小到中等效应(d =.29,95%置信区间 [0.12, 0.45])。与安全依恋相比,抗拒型依恋与抗拒回避型依恋的效应大小不显著。在 20 项包含 2679 个家庭的研究中,我们发现与混乱型依恋和内化行为相关的小效应大小(观察到的 d =.20,95%置信区间 [0.09, 0.31]);然而,当调整可能的发表偏倚时,该效应大小并不显著(d =.12,95%置信区间 [-0.02, 0.23])。现有文献支持这样一种普遍观点,即在生命早期建立的不安全依恋关系,特别是回避型依恋,与随后的内化行为有关,尽管效应大小并不强。