Suppr超能文献

终末期肾病患者的红细胞输血风险

Red blood cell transfusion risks in patients with end-stage renal disease.

作者信息

Tanhehco Yvette C, Berns Jeffrey S

机构信息

Division of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology, Perelman School of Medicine at University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Semin Dial. 2012 Sep-Oct;25(5):539-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2012.01089.x. Epub 2012 Jun 11.

Abstract

Prior to the introduction of recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO), red blood cell (RBC) transfusions were frequently required when iron and anabolic steroids failed to improve the clinical symptoms of anemia associated with hemoglobin (Hb) levels that were commonly less than 7 g/dl. After the approval of EPO in the United States in 1989, the Hb levels of patients on hemodialysis dramatically improved and the need for RBC transfusions decreased significantly. The need for RBC transfusion remains for patients who require an immediate increase in their RBC mass due to symptomatic anemia and is likely to increase due to changes in the management of anemia in dialysis patients resulting from clinical trials data, regulatory changes, and new reimbursement policies for EPO. The safety of the blood supply has greatly improved over the last few decades, and the risk of transfusion-transmitted diseases has now been dramatically reduced. Noninfectious complications of transfusion currently cause the majority of morbidity and mortality associated with transfusion in the United States. Transfusion also brings a risk of alloimmunization, a particular concern for dialysis patients waiting for kidney transplantation. Knowledge of the risks of RBC transfusions will help clinicians better assess the risks and benefits of transfusing patients with ESRD. This article reviews the modern day infectious and noninfectious risks of allogeneic RBC transfusions.

摘要

在重组人促红细胞生成素(EPO)问世之前,当铁剂和合成代谢类固醇无法改善与血红蛋白(Hb)水平通常低于7 g/dl相关的贫血临床症状时,经常需要输注红细胞(RBC)。1989年EPO在美国获批后,血液透析患者的Hb水平显著改善,RBC输注需求大幅下降。对于因症状性贫血而需要立即增加RBC量的患者,RBC输注需求仍然存在,并且由于临床试验数据、监管变化以及EPO新的报销政策导致透析患者贫血管理方式的改变,这种需求可能会增加。在过去几十年中,血液供应的安全性有了很大提高,输血传播疾病的风险现已大幅降低。在美国,输血的非感染性并发症目前是与输血相关的大多数发病和死亡的原因。输血还带来同种免疫的风险,这对等待肾移植的透析患者来说是一个特别令人担忧的问题。了解RBC输血的风险将有助于临床医生更好地评估对终末期肾病患者进行输血的风险和益处。本文综述了异体RBC输血在当今的感染性和非感染性风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验