• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在视觉范式中,区分注意和偶然性意识对评价条件作用效果的影响。

Dissociating the effects of attention and contingency awareness on evaluative conditioning effects in the visual paradigm.

机构信息

a University of Sussex , Brighton , UK.

出版信息

Cogn Emot. 2005 Feb 1;19(2):217-43. doi: 10.1080/02699930441000292.

DOI:10.1080/02699930441000292
PMID:22686602
Abstract

Two experiments are described that investigate the effects of attention in moderating evaluative conditioning (EC) effects in a picture-picture paradigm in which previously discovered experimental artifacts (e.g., Field & Davey, 1999 ) were overcome by counterbalancing conditioned stimuli (CSs) and unconditioned stimuli (USs) across participants. Conditioned responses for individuals who had attention enhanced were compared against a control group and groups for whom attention was impeded using a distracter task. In a second experiment the effects of attention were dissociated from those of contingency awareness by using backward-masked US presentations. The results of these experiments indicate that although associative EC effects may not be disrupted by a lack of contingency awareness, attention is an important factor in establishing conditioning. These results shed some light onto the possible boundary conditions that could explain past inconsistencies in obtaining EC effects in the visual paradigm.

摘要

描述了两个实验,这些实验探讨了在图片-图片范式中,注意对评价性条件作用(EC)效应的调节作用。在该范式中,通过在参与者之间平衡条件刺激(CS)和非条件刺激(US),克服了先前发现的实验artifact(例如,Field & Davey,1999)。使用分心任务来阻碍注意力的个体的条件反应与对照组和注意力受阻的组进行了比较。在第二个实验中,通过使用掩蔽的 US 呈现来分离注意力的作用和条件作用意识的作用。这些实验的结果表明,尽管关联 EC 效应可能不会因缺乏条件作用意识而受到干扰,但注意力是建立条件作用的重要因素。这些结果为解释过去在视觉范式中获得 EC 效应的不一致性的可能边界条件提供了一些线索。

相似文献

1
Dissociating the effects of attention and contingency awareness on evaluative conditioning effects in the visual paradigm.在视觉范式中,区分注意和偶然性意识对评价条件作用效果的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2005 Feb 1;19(2):217-43. doi: 10.1080/02699930441000292.
2
On the respective contributions of awareness of unconditioned stimulus valence and unconditioned stimulus identity in attitude formation through evaluative conditioning.关于无条件刺激效价意识和无条件刺激特性在通过评价性条件作用形成态度过程中的各自作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Sep;97(3):404-20. doi: 10.1037/a0016196.
3
Evaluative learning with single versus multiple unconditioned stimuli: the role of contingency awareness.单一与多个无条件刺激的评价性学习:偶然性意识的作用。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Apr;35(2):286-91. doi: 10.1037/a0013255.
4
Revisiting the relation between contingency awareness and attention: evaluative conditioning relies on a contingency focus.重新审视偶然性意识和注意力之间的关系:评价性条件作用依赖于偶然性焦点。
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(1):166-75. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.565036. Epub 2011 May 24.
5
Evaluative conditioning and the awareness issue: assessing contingency awareness with the four-picture recognition test.评价性条件作用与意识问题:用四图片识别测试评估偶然性意识
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Oct;32(4):454-9. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.4.454.
6
Successful differential evaluative conditioning using simultaneous and trace conditioning procedures in the picture-picture paradigm.在图片-图片范式中使用同时性和痕迹性条件作用程序成功进行差别性评价性条件作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Mar;59(3):482-92. doi: 10.1080/02724990444000140.
7
Implicit misattribution of evaluative responses: contingency-unaware evaluative conditioning requires simultaneous stimulus presentations.内隐归因错误:无意识条件作用下的评价性条件反射需要同时呈现刺激。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Aug;142(3):638-43. doi: 10.1037/a0029989. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
8
I like it because I said that I like it: evaluative conditioning effects can be based on stimulus-response learning.我喜欢它是因为我这么说了:评价性条件作用效应可以基于刺激-反应学习。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Oct;37(4):466-76. doi: 10.1037/a0023077.
9
Dissociating contingency awareness and conditioned attitudes: evidence of contingency-unaware evaluative conditioning.分离条件性意识和条件性态度:条件性无意识评价条件作用的证据。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Aug;141(3):539-57. doi: 10.1037/a0026477. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
10
Aware and (dis)liking: item-based analyses reveal that valence acquisition via evaluative conditioning emerges only when there is contingency awareness.有意识且(不)喜欢:基于项目的分析表明,只有当存在偶然性意识时,通过评价性条件作用的效价习得才会出现。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Jan;33(1):130-44. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.130.

引用本文的文献

1
Valuation of Go Stimuli or Devaluation of No-Go Stimuli? Evidence of an Increased Preference for Attended Go Stimuli Following a Go/No-Go Task.“是”刺激的估值还是“否”刺激的贬值?关于在“是/否”任务后对被关注的“是”刺激偏好增加的证据。
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 30;8:474. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00474. eCollection 2017.
2
Single-trial evaluative conditioning can be moderated by instructed forgetting.单次试验性评价性条件作用可通过指令性遗忘进行调节。
Learn Behav. 2016 Sep;44(3):260-9. doi: 10.3758/s13420-016-0210-9.
3
Implicit misattribution as a mechanism underlying evaluative conditioning.
内隐错误归因作为评价性条件作用的一种潜在机制。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 May;96(5):933-48. doi: 10.1037/a0014747.