• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内隐错误归因作为评价性条件作用的一种潜在机制。

Implicit misattribution as a mechanism underlying evaluative conditioning.

作者信息

Jones Christopher R, Fazio Russell H, Olson Michael A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210-1287, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 May;96(5):933-48. doi: 10.1037/a0014747.

DOI:10.1037/a0014747
PMID:19379028
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2701550/
Abstract

Evaluative conditioning (EC) refers to the formation or change of an attitude toward an object, following that object's pairing with positively or negatively valenced stimuli. The authors provide evidence that EC can occur through an implicit misattribution mechanism in which an evaluative response evoked by a valenced stimulus is incorrectly and implicitly attributed to another stimulus, forming or changing an attitude toward this other stimulus. In 5 studies, the authors measured or manipulated variables related to the potential for the misattribution of an evaluation, or source confusability. Greater EC was observed when participants' eye gaze shifted frequently between a valenced and a neutral stimulus (Studies 1 & 2), when the 2 stimuli appeared in close spatial proximity (Study 3), and when the neutral stimulus was made more perceptually salient than was the valenced stimulus, due to the larger size of the neutral stimulus (Study 4). In other words, conditions conducive to source confusability increased EC. Study 5 provided evidence for multiple mechanisms of EC by comparing the effects of mildly evocative valenced stimuli (those evoking responses that might more easily be misattributed to another object) with more strongly evocative stimuli.

摘要

评价性条件作用(EC)是指在一个对象与具有正性或负性效价的刺激配对之后,对该对象的态度形成或改变。作者提供的证据表明,评价性条件作用可以通过一种内隐的错误归因机制发生,在这种机制中,由效价刺激引发的评价性反应被错误地、内隐地归因于另一个刺激,从而形成或改变对这另一个刺激的态度。在5项研究中,作者测量或操纵了与评价错误归因可能性或来源混淆性相关的变量。当参与者的目光在具有效价的刺激和中性刺激之间频繁转移时(研究1和2),当这两种刺激在空间上紧邻出现时(研究3),以及当中性刺激由于尺寸更大而在感知上比具有效价的刺激更突出时(研究4),观察到了更强的评价性条件作用。换句话说,有利于来源混淆的条件会增强评价性条件作用。研究5通过比较轻度唤起性的效价刺激(那些引发的反应可能更容易被错误归因于另一个对象的刺激)和更强唤起性的刺激的效果,为评价性条件作用的多种机制提供了证据。

相似文献

1
Implicit misattribution as a mechanism underlying evaluative conditioning.内隐错误归因作为评价性条件作用的一种潜在机制。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 May;96(5):933-48. doi: 10.1037/a0014747.
2
Implicit misattribution of evaluative responses: contingency-unaware evaluative conditioning requires simultaneous stimulus presentations.内隐归因错误:无意识条件作用下的评价性条件反射需要同时呈现刺激。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Aug;142(3):638-43. doi: 10.1037/a0029989. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
3
Evaluative Conditioning: The "How" Question.评价性条件作用:“如何”的问题。
Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2010 Jan 1;43:205-255. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(10)43005-1.
4
On the respective contributions of awareness of unconditioned stimulus valence and unconditioned stimulus identity in attitude formation through evaluative conditioning.关于无条件刺激效价意识和无条件刺激特性在通过评价性条件作用形成态度过程中的各自作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Sep;97(3):404-20. doi: 10.1037/a0016196.
5
Controlled and implicit processes in evaluative conditioning on implicit and explicit attitudes toward alcohol and intentions to drink.在对酒精的内隐和外显态度以及饮酒意向进行评估性条件作用时,控制和内隐过程。
Addict Behav. 2018 Jan;76:335-342. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.08.026. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
6
What you see is what will change: evaluative conditioning effects depend on a focus on valence.所见即所变:评价条件作用的效果取决于对效价的关注。
Cogn Emot. 2011 Jan;25(1):89-110. doi: 10.1080/02699931003696380.
7
The interplay of multiple unconditioned stimuli in evaluative conditioning: A weighted averaging framework for attitude formation via stimulus co-occurrences.评估性条件作用中多个无条件刺激的相互作用:一种通过刺激共现形成态度的加权平均框架。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Nov;127(5):964-985. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000401. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
8
Evaluative conditioning may incur attentional costs.评价性条件作用可能会产生注意力成本。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Apr;35(2):279-85. doi: 10.1037/a0013429.
9
Aware and (dis)liking: item-based analyses reveal that valence acquisition via evaluative conditioning emerges only when there is contingency awareness.有意识且(不)喜欢:基于项目的分析表明,只有当存在偶然性意识时,通过评价性条件作用的效价习得才会出现。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Jan;33(1):130-44. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.130.
10
Positive, negative, or all relative? Evaluative conditioning of ambivalence.积极、消极还是全部相关?矛盾情绪的评价性条件作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Apr;185:155-165. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.02.006. Epub 2018 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological Theoretical Frameworks of Healthy and Sustainable Food Choices: A Systematic Review of the Literature.健康可持续食物选择的心理学理论框架:文献系统综述。
Nutrients. 2024 Oct 29;16(21):3687. doi: 10.3390/nu16213687.
2
A conditional judgment procedure for probing evaluative conditioning effects in the absence of feelings of remembering.一种在没有记忆感觉的情况下探测评价条件作用效应的条件判断程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):1140-1163. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02081-w. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
3
Effects on the Affect Misattribution Procedure are strongly moderated by influence awareness.影响情绪归因程序的效果受到影响意识的强烈调节。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Jun;55(4):1558-1586. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01879-4. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
4
An implicit priming intervention alters brain and behavioral responses to high-calorie foods: a randomized controlled study.一项内隐启动干预改变了大脑和行为对高热量食物的反应:一项随机对照研究。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 Apr 1;115(4):1194-1204. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac009.
5
All I Need Is Two: The Clinical Potential of Adding Evaluative Pairing Procedures to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Changing Self-, Body- and Food-Related Evaluations.我所需要的只有两个:将评估配对程序添加到认知行为疗法中以改变自我、身体和食物相关评价的临床潜力。
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 14;10(20):4703. doi: 10.3390/jcm10204703.
6
Acquiring group bias: Observing other people's nonverbal signals can create social group biases.获得群体偏见:观察他人的非言语信号会产生社会群体偏见。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Oct;119(4):824-838. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000218. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
7
Effects of Nodal Distance on Conditioned Stimulus Valences Across Time.节点距离对条件刺激效价随时间的影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 10;10:742. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00742. eCollection 2019.
8
Examining the impact of distance as a contextual cue in evaluative conditioning.考察距离作为评价性条件作用的语境线索的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 4;13(10):e0204855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204855. eCollection 2018.
9
Affect and Cognition: Three Principles.情感与认知:三条原则。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2018 Feb;19:78-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
10
Subliminal influence on preferences? A test of evaluative conditioning for brief visual conditioned stimuli using auditory unconditioned stimuli.阈下影响偏好?使用听觉无条件刺激对简短视觉条件刺激进行评价性条件作用的测试。
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Sep 20;4(9):160935. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160935. eCollection 2017 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Dissociating the effects of attention and contingency awareness on evaluative conditioning effects in the visual paradigm.在视觉范式中,区分注意和偶然性意识对评价条件作用效果的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2005 Feb 1;19(2):217-43. doi: 10.1080/02699930441000292.
2
Evaluative conditioning in social psychology: Facts and speculations.社会心理学中的评价条件作用:事实与推测。
Cogn Emot. 2005 Feb 1;19(2):175-96. doi: 10.1080/02699930441000274.
3
A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning.评价性条件作用的概念与理论分析。
Span J Psychol. 2007 Nov;10(2):230-41. doi: 10.1017/s1138741600006491.
4
Aware and (dis)liking: item-based analyses reveal that valence acquisition via evaluative conditioning emerges only when there is contingency awareness.有意识且(不)喜欢:基于项目的分析表明,只有当存在偶然性意识时,通过评价性条件作用的效价习得才会出现。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Jan;33(1):130-44. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.130.
5
Evaluative conditioning and the awareness issue: assessing contingency awareness with the four-picture recognition test.评价性条件作用与意识问题:用四图片识别测试评估偶然性意识
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Oct;32(4):454-9. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.4.454.
6
Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.评估中的联想与命题过程:内隐与外显态度改变的综合综述
Psychol Bull. 2006 Sep;132(5):692-731. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692.
7
Attention 'capture' by the flash-lag flash.闪光滞后效应中的注意力“捕获”。
Vision Res. 2006 Oct;46(19):3205-13. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.017. Epub 2006 Jun 14.
8
Reducing automatically activated racial prejudice through implicit evaluative conditioning.通过内隐评价性条件作用减少自动激活的种族偏见。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Apr;32(4):421-33. doi: 10.1177/0146167205284004.
9
Eye gaze and individual differences consistent with learned attention in associative blocking and highlighting.在联想性阻断和突显中,眼动注视及个体差异与习得性注意一致。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):830-45. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.830.
10
An inkblot for attitudes: affect misattribution as implicit measurement.一种用于态度的墨迹测试:情感错误归因作为内隐测量。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Sep;89(3):277-93. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277.