Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Account Res. 2012 May;19(3):175-86. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2012.678688.
This article reports results of a field experiment in which two hundred e-mails were sent to authors of recent articles in economics that had promised to send the interested reader supplementary material, such as alternative econometric specifications, "upon request." The e-mails were sent either by a researcher affiliated at Columbia University, New York or the University of Warsaw, Poland; furthermore, the authors' position (assistant professor) was specified in half the e-mails only. Overall, 64% of the approached authors responded to our message, of which two thirds (44% of the entire sample) delivered the requested materials. The frequency and speed of responding and delivering were very weakly affected by the position and affiliation of the sender. Gender or affiliation of the author, number of citations or journal impact factor or the type of object in question seemed to make no difference. However, authors of published articles were much more likely to share than authors of working papers.
这篇文章报告了一项现场实验的结果。该实验向最近在经济学领域发表的文章的作者发送了两百封电子邮件,这些文章承诺会向有兴趣的读者发送补充材料,例如可供选择的计量经济学规格,“应要求提供”。这些电子邮件要么是由纽约哥伦比亚大学或波兰华沙大学的研究人员发送的;此外,只有一半的电子邮件中指定了作者的职位(助理教授)。总体而言,有 64%的被联系的作者回复了我们的信息,其中三分之二(整个样本的 44%)提供了所要求的材料。回复和提供的频率和速度与发件人的职位和隶属关系的关系非常微弱。性别或作者的隶属关系、引用次数或期刊影响因子或所涉及对象的类型似乎没有影响。然而,已发表文章的作者比工作论文的作者更有可能分享。