Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Center, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 May-Jun;54(6):493-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2012.03.006.
The recent advent of an entirely subcutaneous implantable defibrillator (ICD) has provided a relevant contribution to the debate concerning the use of ICD therapy in patients at high risk for death. Although conventional transvenous ICDs have proven very effective during the past 23 years, they still appear to be limited by nontrivial acute and long-term complications. This study delineates some of the historical and current issues characterizing the advent of the subcutaneous ICD system in daily clinical practice. Subcutaneous ICDs have proven effective in more than 1100 patients worldwide and appear to be competitive with transvenous ICD in all clinical conditions not requiring antibradycardia, antitachycardia, or cardiac resynchronization pacing.
最近出现的完全皮下植入式除颤器(ICD)为有关在高死亡风险患者中使用 ICD 治疗的争论提供了相关贡献。尽管在过去的 23 年中,传统的经静脉 ICD 已被证明非常有效,但它们似乎仍然受到非重要的急性和长期并发症的限制。本研究阐述了在日常临床实践中皮下 ICD 系统出现的一些历史和当前问题。皮下 ICD 在全球 1100 多名患者中已被证明有效,并且在所有不需要抗心动过缓、抗心动过速或心脏再同步起搏的临床情况下,似乎与经静脉 ICD 具有竞争力。