Suppr超能文献

结核菌素皮肤试验和三种γ-干扰素释放试验在肺结核鉴别诊断中的应用价值

Usefulness of tuberculin skin test and three interferon-gamma release assays for the differential diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.

作者信息

Kobashi Yoshihiro, Abe Masaaki, Mouri Keiji, Obase Yasushi, Miyashita Naoyuki, Oka Mikio

机构信息

Division of Respiratory Diseases, Department of Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, Japan.

出版信息

Intern Med. 2012;51(10):1199-205. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.51.5703. Epub 2012 May 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We compared the usefulness of tuberculin skin test (TST) and three interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) [QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-2G), QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-tube (QFT-3G), T-SPOT.TB] as the supportive method for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis (TB).

METHODS

The subjects were 66 patients who required clinical differentiation of pulmonary TB. The final clinical diagnosis of pulmonary TB in 22 patients and non-pulmonary TB in 44 patients was established by clinical specimens.

RESULTS

In 22 patients with pulmonary TB, the positive response rate was 59.1% on TST, 81.8% on QFT-2G, 86.4% on QFT-3G and 95.5% on T-SPOT.TB. In 44 patients with non-pulmonary TB disease, the positive response rate was 40.9% on TST, 6.8% on QFT-2G, 6.8% on QFT-3G, 13.6% on T-SPOT.TB. Indeterminate results on three IGRAs were recognized in one patient each on QFT-2G and QFT-3G among patients with pulmonary TB and in two patients each on QFT-2G and QFT-3G among patients with non-pulmonary TB. However, there were no indeterminate results on T-SPOT.TB in either patient group. Patients with false-negative or indeterminate results on IGRAs had severe underlying diseases or were receiving immunosuppressive treatments.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences among the three IGRA tests in this study. However, because the three IGRA tests showed a significantly higher positive response rate for patients with pulmonary TB and a lower positive response rate for patients with non-pulmonary TB than TST, the three IGRA tests seemed to be more useful than TST for the differentiation of patients with pulmonary TB.

摘要

背景

我们比较了结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)和三种干扰素-γ释放试验(IGRAs)[结核感染T细胞检测(QFT-2G)、全血γ干扰素释放试验(QFT-3G)、结核感染T细胞酶联免疫斑点法(T-SPOT.TB)]作为诊断肺结核(TB)的辅助方法的有效性。

方法

研究对象为66例需要进行肺结核临床鉴别诊断的患者。通过临床标本确定了22例肺结核患者和44例非肺结核患者的最终临床诊断。

结果

22例肺结核患者中,TST阳性反应率为59.1%,QFT-2G为81.8%,QFT-3G为86.4%,T-SPOT.TB为95.5%。44例非肺结核疾病患者中,TST阳性反应率为40.9%,QFT-2G为6.8%,QFT-3G为6.8%,T-SPOT.TB为13.6%。在肺结核患者中,QFT-2G和QFT-3G各有1例患者出现三种IGRAs的不确定结果;在非肺结核患者中,QFT-2G和QFT-3G各有2例患者出现不确定结果。然而,两组患者中T-SPOT.TB均未出现不确定结果。IGRAs出现假阴性或不确定结果的患者患有严重基础疾病或正在接受免疫抑制治疗。

结论

本研究中三种IGRA检测之间无显著差异。然而,由于三种IGRA检测对肺结核患者的阳性反应率明显高于TST,对非肺结核患者的阳性反应率低于TST,因此三种IGRA检测在鉴别肺结核患者方面似乎比TST更有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验