Celikyurt Umut, Agacdiken Aysen, Sahin Tayfun, Kozdag Guliz, Vural Ahmet, Ural Dilek
Department of Cardiology, Medical Faculty, Kocaeli University, Umuttepe Yerleskesi, 41380, Kocaeli, Turkey.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012 Nov;35(2):215-8. doi: 10.1007/s10840-012-9694-1. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) predicts adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of RDW on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Sixty-six consecutive patients (mean age, 57 ± 13 years; 42 men) undergoing CRT were included in the study. Hematological parameters and echocardiographic parameters were measured before and 6 months after CRT. An echocardiographic response to CRT was defined as a ≥15 % relative increase in left ventricular ejection fraction after 6 months.
After 6 months of CRT, 47 (71 %) patients were responders. High baseline RDW levels were found in 11 (23 %) and 10 (52 %) patients in responders and non-responders, respectively (p < 0.05). In non-responders, RDW at 6 months was significantly high compared to baseline RDW (17.1 ± 2 vs. 19 ± 2.9) (p < 0.001). There was not any significant change in RDW after CRT in responders (16 ± 1.6 vs. 15.5 ± 1.4) (p > 0.05). In multivariate analysis, significant associates of response to CRT were evaluated adjusting for QRS width, QRS morphology, age, New York Heart Association functional class, hemoglobulin, and RDW level. Baseline RDW level was the only predictor of response to CRT (odds ratio, 1.435; 95 % confidence interval, 1.059-1.945, p = 0.020).
Our data suggest that patients with elevated RDW at baseline are associated with poor response to CRT. Therefore, RDW at baseline could help to identify patients with response to CRT.
红细胞分布宽度(RDW)可预测心力衰竭患者的不良预后。我们旨在研究RDW对心脏再同步治疗(CRT)反应的预后价值。
本研究纳入了66例接受CRT的连续患者(平均年龄57±13岁;42例男性)。在CRT前和CRT后6个月测量血液学参数和超声心动图参数。CRT的超声心动图反应定义为6个月后左心室射血分数相对增加≥15%。
CRT治疗6个月后,47例(71%)患者有反应。反应者和无反应者中分别有11例(23%)和10例(52%)患者基线RDW水平较高(p<0.05)。在无反应者中,6个月时的RDW显著高于基线RDW(17.1±2对19±2.9)(p<0.001)。反应者CRT后RDW无显著变化(16±1.6对15.5±1.4)(p>0.05)。在多变量分析中,对CRT反应的显著相关因素在调整QRS宽度、QRS形态、年龄、纽约心脏协会功能分级、血红蛋白和RDW水平后进行评估。基线RDW水平是CRT反应的唯一预测因素(比值比,1.435;95%置信区间,1.059 - 1.945,p = 0.020)。
我们的数据表明,基线RDW升高的患者对CRT反应较差。因此,基线RDW有助于识别对CRT有反应的患者。