• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

车前草的三重螺旋:遗传学和环境相互作用决定种群动态。

The triple helix of Plantago lanceolata: genetics and the environment interact to determine population dynamics.

机构信息

University of Georgia, Odum School of Ecology, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA.

出版信息

Ecology. 2012 Apr;93(4):793-802. doi: 10.1890/11-0742.1.

DOI:10.1890/11-0742.1
PMID:22690630
Abstract

The theory of evolution via natural selection predicts that the genetic composition of wild populations changes over time in response to the environment. Different genotypes should exhibit different demographic patterns, but genetic variation in demography is often impossible to separate from environmental variation. Here, we asked if genetic variation is important in determining demographic patterns. We answer this question using a long-term field experiment combined with general linear modeling of deterministic population growth rates (lambda), deterministic life table response experiment (LTRE) analysis, and stochastic simulation of demography by paternal lineage in a short-lived perennial plant, Plantago lanceolata, in which we replicated genotypes across four cohorts using a standard breeding design. General linear modeling showed that growth rate varied significantly with year, spatial block, and sire. In LTRE analysis of all cohorts, the strongest influences on growth rate were from year x spatial block, and cohort x year x spatial block interactions. In analysis of genetics vs. temporal environmental variation, the strongest impacts on growth rate were from year and year x sire. Finally, stochastic simulation suggested different genetic composition among cohorts after 100 years, and different population growth rates when genetic differences were accounted for than when they were not. We argue that genetic variation, genotype x environment interactions, natural selection, and cohort effects should be better integrated into population ecological studies, as these processes should result in deviations from projected deterministic and stochastic population parameters.

摘要

自然选择进化理论预测,野生种群的基因组成会随着时间的推移而发生变化,以适应环境。不同的基因型应该表现出不同的人口统计学模式,但人口统计学中的遗传变异通常与环境变化无法区分。在这里,我们想知道遗传变异是否对确定人口统计学模式很重要。我们通过长期的野外实验,结合确定性种群增长率(lambda)的一般线性建模、确定性生命表响应实验(LTRE)分析以及通过父系在一个短寿命多年生植物 Plantago lanceolata 中进行的人口统计学随机模拟来回答这个问题,我们在四个群体中使用标准的繁殖设计复制了基因型。一般线性建模表明,增长率随年份、空间块和 sire 显著变化。在所有队列的 LTRE 分析中,对增长率影响最大的是年份 x 空间块和队列 x 年份 x 空间块的相互作用。在遗传与时间环境变化的分析中,对增长率影响最大的是年份和年份 x sire。最后,随机模拟表明,100 年后,不同队列之间的遗传组成不同,当考虑遗传差异时,种群增长率与不考虑遗传差异时不同。我们认为,遗传变异、基因型 x 环境相互作用、自然选择和群体效应应该更好地纳入种群生态学研究中,因为这些过程应该导致与预测的确定性和随机种群参数的偏差。

相似文献

1
The triple helix of Plantago lanceolata: genetics and the environment interact to determine population dynamics.车前草的三重螺旋:遗传学和环境相互作用决定种群动态。
Ecology. 2012 Apr;93(4):793-802. doi: 10.1890/11-0742.1.
2
Quantifying the effect of genetic, environmental and individual demographic stochastic variability for population dynamics in Plantago lanceolata.量化遗传、环境和个体人口统计随机性变异对车前草种群动态的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 30;11(1):23174. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02468-9.
3
Parental effects in Plantago lanceolata L. III. Measuring parental temperature effects in the field.狭叶车前草中的亲本效应。III. 测量田间亲本温度效应。
Evolution. 2000 Aug;54(4):1207-17. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00555.x.
4
Longitudinal analysis of Plantago: age-by-environment interactions reveal aging.车前草的纵向分析:年龄与环境的相互作用揭示了衰老现象。
Ecology. 2009 Jun;90(6):1427-33. doi: 10.1890/08-0981.1.
5
Variation in stochastic demography between and within central and peripheral regions in a widespread short-lived herb.广泛分布的短命草本植物中,中心和外周区域之间以及区域内的随机种群动态变化存在差异。
Ecology. 2013 Jun;94(6):1378-88. doi: 10.1890/12-1163.1.
6
Longitudinal analysis of Plantago: adaptive benefits of iteroparity in a short-lived, herbaceous perennial.纵向分析车前草:短命草本多年生植物中多次结实的适应性益处。
Ecology. 2010 Feb;91(2):441-7. doi: 10.1890/09-0423.1.
7
EVOLUTIONARY PREDICTABILITY IN NATURAL POPULATIONS: DO MATING SYSTEM AND NONADDITIVE GENETIC VARIANCE INTERACT TO AFFECT HERITABILITIES IN PLANTAGO LANCEOLATA?自然种群中的进化可预测性:交配系统与非加性遗传方差相互作用会影响窄叶车前的遗传力吗?
Evolution. 1997 Dec;51(6):1773-1784. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb05101.x.
8
Dissection of genotype × environment interactions for mucilage and seed yield in Plantago species: Application of AMMI and GGE biplot analyses.解析车前属植物粘液和种子产量的基因型×环境互作:AMMI 和 GGE 双标图分析的应用。
PLoS One. 2018 May 1;13(5):e0196095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196095. eCollection 2018.
9
Age, growth and size interact with stress to determine life span and mortality.年龄、生长和体型与应激相互作用,决定寿命和死亡率。
Exp Gerontol. 2012 Oct;47(10):782-6. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2012.05.020. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
10
Structure, stability and ecological significance of natural epigenetic variation: a large-scale survey in Plantago lanceolata.结构、稳定性和自然表观遗传变异的生态意义:车前草的大规模调查。
New Phytol. 2019 Feb;221(3):1585-1596. doi: 10.1111/nph.15487. Epub 2018 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying the effect of genetic, environmental and individual demographic stochastic variability for population dynamics in Plantago lanceolata.量化遗传、环境和个体人口统计随机性变异对车前草种群动态的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 30;11(1):23174. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02468-9.
2
Predicting evolution in response to climate change: the example of sprouting probability in three dormancy-prone orchid species.预测对气候变化的响应演变:以三种易休眠兰花物种的发芽概率为例。
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Jan 18;4(1):160647. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160647. eCollection 2017 Jan.
3
Longitudinal analysis in : strength of selection and reverse-age analysis reveal age-indeterminate senescence.
纵向分析:选择强度和逆龄分析揭示年龄不确定的衰老。
J Ecol. 2013 May 1;101(3):577-584. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12079. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
4
Genes and quantitative genetic variation involved with senescence in cells, organs, and the whole plant.与细胞、器官和整个植物衰老相关的基因和数量遗传变异。
Front Genet. 2015 Feb 23;6:57. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00057. eCollection 2015.
5
Plants do not count… or do they? New perspectives on the universality of senescence.植物不算在内…… 真的是这样吗?衰老普遍性的新视角。
J Ecol. 2013 May;101(3):545-554. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12089. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
6
Age, growth and size interact with stress to determine life span and mortality.年龄、生长和体型与应激相互作用,决定寿命和死亡率。
Exp Gerontol. 2012 Oct;47(10):782-6. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2012.05.020. Epub 2012 Jun 1.