Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología (IPE-CSIC), Apdo. 13034, 50080 Zaragoza, Spain.
Ecology. 2013 Jun;94(6):1378-88. doi: 10.1890/12-1163.1.
Analyzing intraspecific variation in population dynamics in relation to environmental factors is crucial to understand the current and future distributions of plant species. Across ranges, peripheral populations are often expected to show lower and more temporally variable vital rates than central populations, although it remains unclear how much any differences in vital rates actually contribute to differences in population growth rates. Moreover, few demographic studies accounting for environmental stochasticity have been carried out both at continental and regional scales. In this study we calculated stochastic growth rates in five central and six northern peripheral populations of the widespread shortlived herb Plantago coronopus along the Atlantic Coast in Europe. To evaluate at two spatial scales how mean values and variability of vital rates (i.e., fecundity, recruitment, survival, growth, and shrinkage) contributed to the differences in stochastic growth rates, we performed Stochastic Life Table Response Experiment (SLTRE) analyses between and within central and peripheral regions. Additionally, we searched for correlations between vital rate contributions and local environmental conditions. Lower mean values and greater variability for some vital rates in peripheral than in central populations had an overall negative but nonsignificant effect on the stochastic growth rates in the periphery. Different life cycle components accounted for differences in population growth depending on spatial scale, although recruitment was the vital rate with the highest influence both between and within regions. Interestingly, the same pattern of differentiation among populations was found within central and peripheral areas: in both regions, one group of populations displayed positive contributions of growth and shrinkage and negative contributions of recruitment and survival; the opposite pattern was found in the remaining populations. These differences in vital rate contributions among populations within regions were correlated with precipitation regime, whereas at the continental scale, differences in contribution patterns were related to temperature. Altogether, our results show how populations of P. coronopus exhibit life cycle differences that may enable the species to persist in locations with widely varying environmental conditions. This demographic flexibility may help to explain the success of widespread plants across large and heterogeneous ranges.
分析与环境因素有关的种群动态种内变异对于了解植物物种的当前和未来分布至关重要。在分布范围内,通常预期外围种群的关键生活史参数(如繁殖力、补充、存活率、生长和收缩)比中心种群低且更具时间变异性,尽管尚不清楚关键生活史参数的任何差异实际上对种群增长率的差异有多大贡献。此外,在大陆和区域尺度上,很少有考虑环境随机性的人口统计研究。在这项研究中,我们计算了欧洲大西洋沿岸广泛分布的短命草本植物车前草的五个中心和六个北部外围种群的随机增长率。为了在两个空间尺度上评估关键生活史参数(即繁殖力、补充、存活率、生长和收缩)的平均值和变异性如何导致随机增长率的差异,我们在中心和外围地区之间以及内部进行了随机生命表响应实验(SLTRE)分析。此外,我们还搜索了关键生活史参数贡献与当地环境条件之间的相关性。外围种群的一些关键生活史参数的平均值较低且变异性较大,这对外围种群的随机增长率有整体负但无显著影响。不同的生命周期组成部分根据空间尺度的不同而导致种群增长率的差异,尽管补充是在区域内和区域间具有最高影响力的关键生活史参数。有趣的是,在中心和外围地区内的种群之间也发现了这种分化模式:在这两个地区,一组种群表现出生长和收缩的正贡献以及补充和存活率的负贡献;其余种群则表现出相反的模式。这些区域内种群之间的关键生活史参数贡献差异与降水模式有关,而在大陆尺度上,贡献模式的差异与温度有关。总之,我们的研究结果表明,车前草种群表现出可能使物种在环境条件差异较大的地点生存的生命周期差异。这种人口统计上的灵活性可能有助于解释广泛分布的植物在大而多样的范围内取得成功的原因。