Gazala Sayf, Hunt Ian, Bédard Eric L R
Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Sep;15(3):505-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs238. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was as follows: In adults with unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis, does diaphragmatic plication offer functional improvement in dyspnoea, better pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and return to activity? A total of 126 papers were found using the reported search, of which 13 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, date and country of publication, patient group studied, surgical approach, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these articles are tabulated. Those articles reporting improvement in PFTs following plication, documented this benefit in the following parameters: mean forced vital capacity (range 17-40%), forced expiratory volume at 1 sec (range 21-27%), functional residual capacity (range 20-21%) and total lung capacity (range 16-19%). The percentage of postoperative improvement in shortness of breath as measured by a dyspnoea score was reported to be between 90 and 96% in the thoracotomy group and 100% in the Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) group, the dyspnoea score that was used in all the studies was a visual analogue scale between 0 and 10 where 0 is no dyspnoea and 10 is the worst dyspnoea a patient can have. One of the studies reported postoperative normalization in ventilation perfusion scan (VQ) scan parameters when compared with the preoperative mismatch. Complication rate was similar between the two groups, while the mortality rate was 4% in the thoracotomy group and 0% in the VATS group. The total number of patients included in all the studies combined was 161. All reports included in this review are observational studies (one cohort study and the remainder being case series); therefore, the risk of selection, information and publication biases are high and conclusions should be implemented with caution. We conclude that diaphragmatic plication can improve the functional status, shortness of breath and PFTs of patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis. Patients undergoing a VATS approach appear to have more advantages in objective and subjective measures (including PFTs, dyspnoea score, length of hospital stay and postoperative complications). Further research with high-quality study designs is advised, focussing mainly on the long-term benefits and assessment of health-related quality of life.
根据结构化方案撰写了一篇胸外科最佳证据主题文章。所探讨的问题如下:在单侧膈肌麻痹的成年人中,膈肌折叠术能否改善呼吸困难的功能、获得更好的肺功能测试(PFT)结果并恢复活动能力?通过报告的检索共找到126篇论文,其中13篇代表了回答该临床问题的最佳证据。将这些文章的作者、发表日期和国家、研究的患者群体、手术方法、研究类型、相关结果及结果制成表格。那些报告膈肌折叠术后PFT改善情况的文章,在以下参数中记录了这种益处:平均用力肺活量(范围为17 - 40%)、第1秒用力呼气量(范围为21 - 27%)、功能残气量(范围为20 - 21%)和肺总量(范围为16 - 19%)。开胸手术组报告的术后呼吸困难评分改善百分比在90%至96%之间,电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)组为100%,所有研究中使用的呼吸困难评分是0至10的视觉模拟量表,其中0表示无呼吸困难,10表示患者可能出现的最严重呼吸困难。其中一项研究报告称,与术前不匹配相比,术后通气灌注扫描(VQ)扫描参数恢复正常。两组的并发症发生率相似,而开胸手术组的死亡率为4%,VATS组为0%。所有研究纳入的患者总数为161例。本综述纳入的所有报告均为观察性研究(一项队列研究,其余为病例系列);因此,选择、信息和发表偏倚的风险很高,结论应谨慎应用。我们得出结论,膈肌折叠术可改善单侧膈肌麻痹患者的功能状态、呼吸困难和PFT结果。接受VATS手术的患者在客观和主观指标(包括PFT、呼吸困难评分、住院时间和术后并发症)方面似乎具有更多优势。建议采用高质量研究设计进行进一步研究,主要关注长期益处以及与健康相关生活质量的评估。