• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用电子健康数据构建用于比较疗效和流行病学研究的登记处时,糖尿病和哮喘病例的识别、验证和代表性。

Diabetes and asthma case identification, validation, and representativeness when using electronic health data to construct registries for comparative effectiveness and epidemiologic research.

机构信息

HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN 55425, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl(0):S30-5. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318259c011.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318259c011
PMID:22692256
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4671076/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advances in health information technology and widespread use of electronic health data offer new opportunities for development of large scale multisite disease-specific patient registries. Such registries use existing data, can be constructed at relatively low cost, include large numbers of patients, and once created can be used to address many issues with a short time between posing a question and obtaining an answer. Potential applications include comparative effectiveness research, public health surveillance, mapping and improving quality of clinical care, and others.

OBJECTIVE AND DISCUSSION

This paper describes selected conceptual and practical challenges related to development of multisite diabetes and asthma registries, including development of case definitions, validation of case identification methods, variation in electronic health data sources; representativeness of registry populations, including the impact of attrition. Specific challenges are illustrated with data from actual registries.

摘要

背景

健康信息技术的进步和电子健康数据的广泛使用为开发大规模的多站点疾病特异性患者登记处提供了新的机会。这些登记处使用现有数据,成本相对较低,可以包含大量患者,并且一旦创建,就可以用于解决许多问题,从提出问题到获得答案的时间很短。潜在的应用包括比较有效性研究、公共卫生监测、绘制和改善临床护理质量等。

目的和讨论

本文描述了与开发多站点糖尿病和哮喘登记处相关的选定概念和实际挑战,包括病例定义的制定、病例识别方法的验证、电子健康数据源的变化;登记处人群的代表性,包括流失的影响。通过实际登记处的数据说明了具体的挑战。

相似文献

1
Diabetes and asthma case identification, validation, and representativeness when using electronic health data to construct registries for comparative effectiveness and epidemiologic research.利用电子健康数据构建用于比较疗效和流行病学研究的登记处时,糖尿病和哮喘病例的识别、验证和代表性。
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl(0):S30-5. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318259c011.
2
Commentary: Electronic health records for comparative effectiveness research.评论:用于比较效果研究的电子健康记录
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S19-20. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182588ee4.
3
Construction of a multisite DataLink using electronic health records for the identification, surveillance, prevention, and management of diabetes mellitus: the SUPREME-DM project.利用电子健康记录构建多站点 DataLink 以识别、监测、预防和管理糖尿病:SUPREME-DM 项目。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E110. doi: 10.5888/pcd9.110311. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
4
Data standards in diabetes patient registries.糖尿病患者登记处的数据标准。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 May 1;5(3):476-85. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500302.
5
The diabetes audit and research in Tayside Scotland (DARTS) study: electronic record linkage to create a diabetes register. DARTS/MEMO Collaboration.苏格兰泰赛德地区糖尿病审计与研究(DARTS)研究:通过电子记录链接创建糖尿病登记册。DARTS/MEMO合作团队。
BMJ. 1997 Aug 30;315(7107):524-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7107.524.
6
Oncoshare: lessons learned from building an integrated multi-institutional database for comparative effectiveness research.Oncoshare:构建用于比较效果研究的综合多机构数据库的经验教训。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:970-8. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
7
Opportunities and challenges for comparative effectiveness research (CER) with Electronic Clinical Data: a perspective from the EDM forum.电子临床数据下比较有效性研究(CER)的机遇与挑战:EDM 论坛观点。
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S11-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318258530f.
8
CER Hub: An informatics platform for conducting comparative effectiveness research using multi-institutional, heterogeneous, electronic clinical data.CER中心:一个利用多机构、异构电子临床数据进行比较效果研究的信息学平台。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct;84(10):763-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
9
Interoperable electronic patient records for health care improvement.用于改善医疗保健的可互操作电子病历。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;150:19-23.
10
Disease registries provide performance boost without big cost.疾病登记系统在无需高昂成本的情况下提高了效率。
Perform Improv Advis. 2004 May;8(5):53-8, 49.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer Registry Enrichment via Linkage with Hospital-Based Electronic Medical Records: A Pilot Investigation.癌症登记系统通过与医院电子病历链接进行丰富:一项试点研究。
J Registry Manag. 2024 Spring;51(1):41-48.
2
Estimating the completeness of physician billing claims for diabetes case ascertainment: a multiprovince investigation.估算糖尿病病例确定中医生计费索赔的完整性:一项多省份调查。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2023 Dec;43(12):511-521. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.43.12.03.
3
The Incidence Trend of Type 1 Diabetes among Children and Adolescents 0-14 Years of Age in the West, South, and Tripoli Regions of Libya (2009-2018).利比亚西部地区、南部地区和的黎波里地区 0-14 岁儿童和青少年 1 型糖尿病发病率趋势(2009-2018 年)。
J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2023 Nov 22;15(4):356-364. doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2023.2023-1-17. Epub 2023 May 23.
4
Primary care asthma surveillance: a review of knowledge translation tools and strategies for quality improvement.基层医疗中的哮喘监测:知识转化工具与质量改进策略综述
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2023 Jan 17;19(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13223-022-00755-2.
5
Validation of Danish registry-cases of type 1 diabetes in women giving live birth using a clinical cohort as gold standard.验证丹麦登记系统中女性活产分娩 1 型糖尿病病例,以临床队列为金标准。
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2023 Jan;6(1):e374. doi: 10.1002/edm2.374. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
6
Using an Integrated Framework to Investigate the Facilitators and Barriers of Health Information Technology Implementation in Noncommunicable Disease Management: Systematic Review.利用综合框架研究非传染性疾病管理中健康信息技术实施的促进因素和障碍:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 20;24(7):e37338. doi: 10.2196/37338.
7
Predicting Continuity of Asthma Care Using a Machine Learning Model: Retrospective Cohort Study.使用机器学习模型预测哮喘护理的连续性:回顾性队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 22;19(3):1237. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031237.
8
Using a Constraint-Based Method to Identify Chronic Disease Patients Who Are Apt to Obtain Care Mostly Within a Given Health Care System: Retrospective Cohort Study.使用基于约束的方法识别在特定医疗保健系统中最有可能获得医疗服务的慢性病患者:回顾性队列研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Oct 7;5(10):e26314. doi: 10.2196/26314.
9
Ranking Rule-Based Automatic Explanations for Machine Learning Predictions on Asthma Hospital Encounters in Patients With Asthma: Retrospective Cohort Study.基于排名规则的哮喘患者哮喘医院就诊机器学习预测自动解释:回顾性队列研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Aug 11;9(8):e28287. doi: 10.2196/28287.
10
Electronic Medical Record Risk Modeling of Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.2型糖尿病患者心血管结局的电子病历风险建模
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Jul;12(7):2007-2017. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01096-w. Epub 2021 Jun 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of administrative hospital registry data and a civil registry to measure survival and other outcomes after cancer.利用医院行政登记数据和民事登记来衡量癌症后的生存率及其他结局。
Clin Epidemiol. 2011;3(Suppl 1):1-2. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S22509. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
2
Data standards in diabetes patient registries.糖尿病患者登记处的数据标准。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 May 1;5(3):476-85. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500302.
3
High asthma prevalence and increased morbidity among rural children in a Medicaid cohort.农村儿童中 Medicaid 队列中的哮喘患病率高且发病率增加。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011 Jun;106(6):467-73. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2011.02.013. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
4
Facilitating Clinical Research through the Health Information Exchange: Lipid Control as an Example.通过健康信息交换促进临床研究:以血脂控制为例。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13;2010:947-51.
5
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2011.《糖尿病医疗护理标准——2011 年》
Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan;34 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-61. doi: 10.2337/dc11-S011.
6
Investigating concordance in diabetes diagnosis between primary care charts (electronic medical records) and health administrative data: a retrospective cohort study.调查初级保健图表(电子病历)和健康管理数据中糖尿病诊断的一致性:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Dec 23;10:347. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-347.
7
Comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors versus beta-blockers as second-line therapy for hypertension.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与β受体阻滞剂作为高血压二线治疗的比较疗效
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Sep;3(5):453-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.940874. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
8
The impact of electronic medical records data sources on an adverse drug event quality measure.电子病历数据源对药物不良事件质量衡量标准的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):185-91. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.002451.
9
Review: electronic health records and the reliability and validity of quality measures: a review of the literature.综述:电子健康记录与质量指标的可靠性和有效性:文献回顾。
Med Care Res Rev. 2010 Oct;67(5):503-27. doi: 10.1177/1077558709359007. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
10
Identifying patients with physician-diagnosed asthma in health administrative databases.在健康管理数据库中识别经医生诊断的哮喘患者。
Can Respir J. 2009 Nov-Dec;16(6):183-8. doi: 10.1155/2009/963098.