• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子病历数据源对药物不良事件质量衡量标准的影响。

The impact of electronic medical records data sources on an adverse drug event quality measure.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):185-91. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.002451.

DOI:10.1136/jamia.2009.002451
PMID:20190062
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3000787/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of billing and clinical data extracted from an electronic medical record system on the calculation of an adverse drug event (ADE) quality measure approved for use in The Joint Commission's ORYX program, a mandatory national hospital quality reporting system.

DESIGN

The Child Health Corporation of America's "Use of Rescue Agents-ADE Trigger" quality measure uses medication billing data contained in the Pediatric Health Information Systems (PHIS) data warehouse to create The Joint Commission-approved quality measure. Using a similar query, we calculated the quality measure using PHIS plus four data sources extracted from our electronic medical record (EMR) system: medications charged, medication orders placed, medication orders with associated charges (orders charged), and medications administered.

MEASUREMENTS

Inclusion and exclusion criteria were identical for all queries. Denominators and numerators were calculated using the five data sets. The reported quality measure is the ADE rate (numerator/denominator).

RESULTS

Significant differences in denominators, numerators, and rates were calculated from different data sources within a single institution's EMR. Differences were due to both common clinical practices that may be similar across institutions and unique workflow practices not likely to be present at any other institution. The magnitude of the differences would significantly alter the national comparative ranking of our institution compared to other PHIS institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

More detailed clinical information may result in quality measures that are not comparable across institutions due institution-specific workflow, differences that are exposed using EMR-derived data.

摘要

目的

研究从电子病历系统中提取的计费和临床数据对联合委员会 ORYX 计划中使用的药物不良事件(ADE)质量测量的计算的影响,ORYX 计划是强制性的国家医院质量报告系统。

设计

美国儿童健康公司的“使用救援剂-ADE 触发”质量测量使用儿科健康信息系统(PHIS)数据仓库中的药物计费数据来创建联合委员会批准的质量测量。使用类似的查询,我们使用 PHIS 加从我们的电子病历(EMR)系统中提取的四个数据源计算了质量测量:计费药物、下置的药物医嘱、有相关费用的医嘱(医嘱计费)和管理的药物。

测量

所有查询的纳入和排除标准均相同。使用五个数据集计算了分子和分母。报告的质量测量是 ADE 率(分子/分母)。

结果

在单个机构的 EMR 中,从不同的数据源计算出了分母、分子和比率的显著差异。差异是由于可能在机构之间相似的常见临床实践和不太可能在任何其他机构存在的独特工作流程实践造成的。差异的大小将极大地改变我们机构与其他 PHIS 机构相比的国家比较排名。

结论

由于机构特定的工作流程、使用 EMR 衍生数据暴露的差异,更详细的临床信息可能会导致质量测量在机构之间不可比。

相似文献

1
The impact of electronic medical records data sources on an adverse drug event quality measure.电子病历数据源对药物不良事件质量衡量标准的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):185-91. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.002451.
2
Evaluation of a mandatory quality assurance data capture in anesthesia: a secure electronic system to capture quality assurance information linked to an automated anesthesia record.评估麻醉中的强制性质量保证数据采集:一个安全的电子系统,用于采集与自动化麻醉记录相关的质量保证信息。
Anesth Analg. 2011 May;112(5):1218-25. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31821207f0. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
3
Hospices' use of electronic medical records for quality assessment and performance improvement programs.临终关怀机构在质量评估和绩效改进项目中对电子病历的使用。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Oct;48(4):582-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.11.010. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
4
An Outpatient Performance Improvement Project: A Baseline Assessment of Adherence to Pain Reassessment Standards.一个门诊绩效改进项目:对疼痛重新评估标准依从性的基线评估
Mil Med. 2017 May;182(5):e1688-e1695. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00104.
5
The Joint Commission releases Improving America's hospitals: The Joint Commission's annual report on quality and safety 2007.联合委员会发布《改善美国医院:联合委员会2007年质量与安全年度报告》。
Jt Comm Perspect. 2007 Dec;27(12):1, 3.
6
Approved: The Joint Commission's hospital performance measurement implementation plan through 2008.批准:联合委员会的医院绩效评估实施计划,有效期至2008年。
Jt Comm Perspect. 2007 Mar;27(3):1, 3-5.
7
Quality assurance, control, and monitoring. The future role of information technology from the Joint Commission's perspective.质量保证、控制与监测。从联合委员会的视角看信息技术的未来作用。
Comput Nurs. 1990 May-Jun;8(3):105-10.
8
JCAHO views medication reconciliation as adverse-event prevention.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005 Aug 1;62(15):1528, 1530, 1532. doi: 10.2146/news050008.
9
Integrating performance measure data into the Joint Commission accreditation process.将绩效评估数据纳入联合委员会认证流程。
Eval Health Prof. 1999 Sep;22(3):283-97. doi: 10.1177/016327879902200301.
10
Building a national electronic medical record exchange system - experiences in Taiwan.建立全国性电子病历交换系统:台湾的经验。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2015 Aug;121(1):14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.04.013. Epub 2015 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges for Data Quality in the Clinical Data Life Cycle: Systematic Review.临床数据生命周期中数据质量面临的挑战:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 23;27:e60709. doi: 10.2196/60709.
2
Comparison of Administrative Database-Derived and Hospital-Derived Data for Monitoring Blood Culture Use in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.比较行政数据库和医院数据在监测儿科重症监护病房血液培养使用中的应用。
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2023 Jul 31;12(7):436-442. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piad048.
3
Increased reporting but decreased mortality associated with adverse events in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery: Competing forces in an era of heightened focus on care quality?肺癌手术患者不良事件报告增加但死亡率降低:在关注医疗质量的时代,这些因素是否相互矛盾?
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 9;15(4):e0231258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231258. eCollection 2020.
4
Barriers and facilitators to data quality of electronic health records used for clinical research in China: a qualitative study.中国用于临床研究的电子健康记录数据质量的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 2;9(7):e029314. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029314.
5
Visualizing nationwide variation in medicare Part D prescribing patterns.可视化医疗保险处方模式的全国性差异。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0670-2.
6
Reporting Data Quality Assessment Results: Identifying Individual and Organizational Barriers and Solutions.报告数据质量评估结果:识别个人和组织层面的障碍及解决方案。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017 Sep 4;5(1):16. doi: 10.5334/egems.214.
7
Extracting autism spectrum disorder data from the electronic health record.从电子健康记录中提取自闭症谱系障碍数据。
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Jul 19;8(3):731-741. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2017-02-RA-0029.
8
A Harmonized Data Quality Assessment Terminology and Framework for the Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record Data.电子健康记录数据二次使用的统一数据质量评估术语和框架。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Sep 11;4(1):1244. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1244. eCollection 2016.
9
Navigating a ship with a broken compass: evaluating standard algorithms to measure patient safety.用失灵的罗盘驾驶船只:评估衡量患者安全的标准算法。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;24(2):310-315. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw126.
10
Role of Pharmacovigilance in India: An overview.药物警戒在印度的作用:概述
Online J Public Health Inform. 2015 Jul 1;7(2):e223. doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v7i2.5595. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of hospital adverse events identified by three widely used detection methods.三种广泛使用的检测方法所识别的医院不良事件的比较。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2009 Aug;21(4):301-7. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzp027.
2
Evaluation of the agency for healthcare research and quality pediatric quality indicators.医疗保健研究与质量机构儿科质量指标评估。
Pediatrics. 2008 Jun;121(6):e1723-31. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3247. Epub 2008 May 12.
3
Do the AHRQ patient safety indicators flag conditions that are present at the time of hospital admission?医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)的患者安全指标是否能标记出入院时就已存在的病症?
Med Care. 2008 May;46(5):516-22. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31815f537f.
4
Development, testing, and findings of a pediatric-focused trigger tool to identify medication-related harm in US children's hospitals.一种以儿科为重点的触发工具在美国儿童医院中识别与药物相关伤害的开发、测试及结果
Pediatrics. 2008 Apr;121(4):e927-35. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1779.
5
Public reporting: one piece of the quality improvement puzzle.
Healthc Q. 2008;11(1):18-9. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2008.19491.
6
Predicting computerized physician order entry system adoption in US hospitals: can the federal mandate be met?预测美国医院采用计算机化医嘱录入系统的情况:能否符合联邦规定?
Int J Med Inform. 2008 Aug;77(8):539-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.10.009. Epub 2007 Nov 28.
7
Public reporting of quality information on Medicaid health plans.医疗补助健康计划质量信息的公开报告。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2007 Spring;28(3):5-16.
8
Automated review of electronic health records to assess quality of care for outpatients with heart failure.对电子健康记录进行自动审查,以评估心力衰竭门诊患者的护理质量。
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Feb 20;146(4):270-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-4-200702200-00006.
9
Assessing the validity of national quality measures for coronary artery disease using an electronic health record.使用电子健康记录评估国家冠状动脉疾病质量指标的有效性。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Nov 13;166(20):2272-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.20.2272.
10
Comparison of methodologies for calculating quality measures based on administrative data versus clinical data from an electronic health record system: implications for performance measures.基于行政数据与电子健康记录系统临床数据计算质量指标的方法比较:对绩效指标的影响
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Jan-Feb;14(1):10-5. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2198. Epub 2006 Oct 26.