Orcy Rafael B, Dias Pamela S, Seus Thamires Lc, Barcellos Franklin C, Bohlke Maristela
Physiotherapy School, Hospital Universitário São Francisco de Paula, Universidade Católica de Pelotas, Rua Marechal Deodoro 1123, Pelotas, RS 96020-220, Brazil.
Physiother Res Int. 2012 Dec;17(4):235-43. doi: 10.1002/pri.1526. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
This study aims to compare the effects of combined resistance and aerobic exercise with a resistance programme alone on functional performance among haemodialysis patients.
The design was a randomized controlled trial.
The setting was the dialysis unit of a Brazilian university hospital.
Haemodialysis patients were assigned to one kind of intervention or another.
The patients were assigned to receive the resistance exercise combined with an aerobic training or to maintain an ongoing resistance programme alone for a period of 10 weeks.
The functional performance of patients was assessed before and after the intervention through the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). The difference over time of the 6MWT was compared between the groups through two-way repeated-measures ANOVA.
Thirteen patients were allocated for each group of intervention. The difference in distance walked before and after intervention in the combined training group was of +39.7 ± 61.4 m, and the difference in the resistance training group was of -19.2 ± 53.9 m, p = 0.02.
Although the best protocol of exercise for patients on dialysis is not yet clear, in our sample of haemodialysis patients the combination of aerobic and resistance training was more effective than resistance training alone to improve functional performance.
本研究旨在比较联合抗阻运动与有氧运动和单纯抗阻训练方案对血液透析患者功能表现的影响。
本研究为随机对照试验。
巴西一家大学医院的透析科。
血液透析患者被分配至一种或另一种干预措施。
患者被分配接受抗阻运动与有氧训练相结合的方案,或仅维持正在进行的抗阻训练方案,为期10周。
干预前后通过6分钟步行试验(6MWT)评估患者的功能表现。通过双向重复测量方差分析比较两组之间6MWT随时间的差异。
每组干预措施分配了13名患者。联合训练组干预前后步行距离的差异为+39.7±61.4米,抗阻训练组的差异为-19.2±53.9米,p=0.02。
虽然目前尚不清楚透析患者最佳的运动方案,但在我们的血液透析患者样本中,有氧训练与抗阻训练相结合比单纯抗阻训练更有效地改善功能表现。