Department of Radiology, University Hospitals, Est Parisien, Tenon Hospital, 4 rue de la Chine, Paris 75020, France.
Hum Reprod. 2012 Aug;27(8):2352-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des211. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
What is the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of parametrial endometriosis in comparison with surgicopathological findings?
MRI displayed an accuracy of 96.4% in the preoperative diagnosis of parametrial involvement by deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE).
MRI is the best technique for preoperative mapping of DIE. This preliminary paper shows that T2-weighted MRI is a valuable tool for the preoperative evaluation of parametrial involvement by endometriosis.
A retrospective study of an MRI database was used to identify examinations performed in women, who had a clinical suspicion of pelvic endometriosis (n=666), between 2005 and 2009 in a university medical centre in France.
Exclusion criteria were previous surgery for DIE, incomplete surgical evaluation, repeat MRI examinations and incomplete MR protocol. Only symptomatic patients who underwent surgery with a pathological correlation were included (n=83). An experienced radiologist, blind to the surgical and histological findings, evaluated sagittal, axial and thin-section oblique axial MR images obtained from the 83 patients.
Descriptive statistics and Fisher exact test were used.
The prevalence of DIE and parametrial endometriosis was 76/83 (91.6%) and 12/83 (14.5%), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy and positive and negative likelihood ratios for the diagnosis of parametrial endometriosis of low signal intensity on T2-weighted MRI, pelvic wall involvement and ureteral dilatation, were 83.3%, 98.6%, 90.9%, 97.2%, 96.4%, 59.2 and 0.17, 58.3%, 98.6%, 87.5%, 93.3%, 92.8%, 41.4 and 0.42 and 16.7%, 100%, 100%, 87.7%, 88%, infinity and 0.83, respectively, with the patient as the unit of analysis. BIAS AND LIMITATIONS: The study design was retrospective, and thus prone to bias. Only one experienced reader performed the analysis, so no data are available on intra- or interobserver variability. GENERALISABILITY: At present, no consensus exists on the optimal MR protocol to be used for the evaluation of DIE, thus limiting the wider implications of this study.
No funding was obtained for this study. The authors have no conflict of interest.
与手术病理结果相比,磁共振成像(MRI)在诊断宫旁子宫内膜异位症中的准确性如何?
MRI 术前诊断深部浸润性子宫内膜异位症(DIE)宫旁受累的准确率为 96.4%。
MRI 是术前 DIE 定位的最佳技术。本初步研究表明,T2 加权 MRI 是术前评估子宫内膜异位症宫旁受累的有价值工具。
对法国一所大学医学中心 2005 年至 2009 年间因盆腔子宫内膜异位症疑似接受 MRI 检查的 666 例女性的 MRI 数据库进行回顾性研究。
排除标准为既往 DIE 手术、手术评估不完整、重复 MRI 检查和 MRI 方案不完整。仅纳入接受手术且有病理相关性的有症状患者(n=83)。一位有经验的放射科医生对 83 例患者的矢状位、轴位和薄层斜轴 MRI 图像进行评估,该医生对手术和组织学结果不知情。
采用描述性统计和 Fisher 确切检验。
DIE 和宫旁子宫内膜异位症的患病率分别为 76/83(91.6%)和 12/83(14.5%)。T2 加权 MRI 低信号、盆壁受累和输尿管扩张对宫旁子宫内膜异位症的诊断敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、准确率、阳性似然比和阴性似然比分别为 83.3%、98.6%、90.9%、97.2%、96.4%、59.2 和 0.17、58.3%、98.6%、87.5%、93.3%、92.8%、41.4 和 0.42,以及 16.7%、100%、100%、87.7%、88%、无穷大和 0.83,单位为患者。
研究设计为回顾性,因此易出现偏倚。仅一名有经验的读者进行了分析,因此没有关于观察者内或观察者间变异性的数据。
目前,尚无关于评估深部浸润性子宫内膜异位症最佳 MRI 方案的共识,因此限制了本研究的更广泛影响。
本研究无资金支持。作者无利益冲突。