• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

时间泛化梯度的相互作用预测了语境效应。

The interaction of temporal generalization gradients predicts the context effect.

机构信息

University of Minho, Portugal.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 May;97(3):263-79. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.97-263.

DOI:10.1901/jeab.2012.97-263
PMID:22693358
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3372952/
Abstract

In a temporal double bisection task, animals learn two discriminations. In the presence of Red and Green keys, responses to Red are reinforced after 1-s samples and responses to Green are reinforced after 4-s samples; in the presence of Blue and Yellow keys, responses to Blue are reinforced after 4-s samples and responses to Yellow are reinforced after 16-s samples. Subsequently, given a choice between Green and Blue, the probability of choosing Green increases with the sample duration-the context effect. In the present study we asked whether this effect could be predicted from the stimulus generalization gradients induced by the two basic discriminations. Six pigeons learned to peck Green following 4-s samples (S(+)) but not following 1-s samples (S(-)) and to peck Red following 4-s samples (S(+)) but not following 16-s samples (S(-)). Temporal generalization gradients for Green and Red were then obtained. Finally, the pigeons were given a choice between Green and Red following sample durations ranging from 1 to 16 s. Results showed that a) the two generalization gradients had the minimum at the S(-) duration, an intermediate value between the S(-) and the S(+) durations, and the maximum at the S(+) as well as more extreme durations; b) on choice trials, preference for Green over Red increased with sample duration, the context effect; and c) the two generalization gradients predicted the average context effect well. The Learning-to-Time model accounts for the major trends in the data.

摘要

在时间二分任务中,动物学习两种辨别。在红键和绿键存在的情况下,对红键的反应在 1 秒样本后得到强化,对绿键的反应在 4 秒样本后得到强化;在蓝键和黄键存在的情况下,对蓝键的反应在 4 秒样本后得到强化,对黄键的反应在 16 秒样本后得到强化。随后,在绿键和蓝键之间进行选择时,选择绿键的概率随着样本持续时间的增加而增加,即上下文效应。在本研究中,我们想知道这个效应是否可以从两个基本辨别引起的刺激泛化梯度来预测。六只鸽子学会了在 4 秒样本后啄绿键(S(+))而不是在 1 秒样本后啄绿键(S(-)),以及在 4 秒样本后啄红键(S(+))而不是在 16 秒样本后啄红键(S(-))。然后获得了绿键和红键的时间泛化梯度。最后,鸽子在 1 到 16 秒的样本持续时间之间进行绿键和红键之间的选择。结果表明:a)两个泛化梯度在 S(-)持续时间处最小,在 S(-)和 S(+)持续时间之间有一个中间值,在 S(+)以及更极端的持续时间处最大;b)在选择试验中,对绿键的偏好随着样本持续时间的增加而增加,即上下文效应;c)两个泛化梯度很好地预测了平均上下文效应。学习到时间模型解释了数据中的主要趋势。

相似文献

1
The interaction of temporal generalization gradients predicts the context effect.时间泛化梯度的相互作用预测了语境效应。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 May;97(3):263-79. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.97-263.
2
The context effect as interaction of temporal generalization gradients: testing the fundamental assumptions of the Learning-to-Time model.作为时间泛化梯度相互作用的情境效应:检验时间学习模型的基本假设
Behav Processes. 2013 May;95:18-30. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
3
Context effect in a temporal bisection task with the choice keys available during the sample.在样本呈现期间选择键可用的时间二分任务中的情境效应。
Behav Processes. 2009 Jun;81(2):286-92. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.12.021. Epub 2009 Jan 4.
4
Errorless learning of a conditional temporal discrimination.无错误条件时间辨别学习。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Jan;95(1):1-20. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.95-1.
5
Learning in the temporal bisection task: Relative or absolute?时间二分任务中的学习:相对的还是绝对的?
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016 Jan;42(1):67-81. doi: 10.1037/xan0000089.
6
Further tests of the Scalar Expectancy Theory (SET) and the Learning-to-Time (LeT) model in a temporal bisection task.在时间二等分任务中对标量期望理论(SET)和时间学习(LeT)模型的进一步测试。
Behav Processes. 2006 Jun 1;72(3):195-206. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.03.001. Epub 2006 Mar 7.
7
Comparison of Scalar Expectancy Theory (SET) and the Learning-to-Time (LeT) model in a successive temporal bisection task.连续时间二分任务中,标量期望理论(SET)与时间学习(LeT)模型的比较。
Behav Processes. 2008 Jun;78(2):269-78. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.12.008. Epub 2007 Dec 27.
8
Context effects in a temporal discrimination task" further tests of the Scalar Expectancy Theory and Learning-to-Time models.时间辨别任务中的情境效应:对标量期望理论和时间学习模型的进一步测试
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Jul;90(1):33-51. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.90-33.
9
Temporal generalization gradients following an interdimensional discrimination protocol.遵循维度间辨别范式的时间泛化梯度
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(9):1701-18. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1091851. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
10
Representation of time intervals in a double bisection task: relative or absolute?双平分任务中时间间隔的表征:相对的还是绝对的?
Behav Processes. 2009 Jun;81(2):280-5. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.10.012. Epub 2008 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Searching for nothing: placing zero on the temporal continuum.寻找虚无:将零置于时间连续统上。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jul;26(4):1209-1216. doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01770-5. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Learning to Time: a perspective.学会掌握时间:一种观点。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Nov;92(3):423-58. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.92-423.
2
Context effect in a temporal bisection task with the choice keys available during the sample.在样本呈现期间选择键可用的时间二分任务中的情境效应。
Behav Processes. 2009 Jun;81(2):286-92. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.12.021. Epub 2009 Jan 4.
3
Context effects in a temporal discrimination task" further tests of the Scalar Expectancy Theory and Learning-to-Time models.时间辨别任务中的情境效应:对标量期望理论和时间学习模型的进一步测试
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Jul;90(1):33-51. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.90-33.
4
Failure to obtain value enhancement by within-trial contrast in simultaneous and successive discriminations.在同时性和继时性辨别中,未能通过试验内对比获得价值增强。
Learn Behav. 2008 Feb;36(1):1-11. doi: 10.3758/lb.36.1.1.
5
Comparison of Scalar Expectancy Theory (SET) and the Learning-to-Time (LeT) model in a successive temporal bisection task.连续时间二分任务中,标量期望理论(SET)与时间学习(LeT)模型的比较。
Behav Processes. 2008 Jun;78(2):269-78. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.12.008. Epub 2007 Dec 27.
6
Temporal generalization and peak shift in humans.人类的时间泛化与峰值转移
Learn Behav. 2007 May;35(2):123-30. doi: 10.3758/bf03193047.
7
The role of temporal generalization in a temporal discrimination task.时间泛化在时间辨别任务中的作用。
Behav Processes. 2007 Feb 22;74(2):115-25. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.08.004. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
8
Control of responding by stimulus duration.刺激持续时间对反应的控制。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Jul;16(1):81-7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-81.
9
Further tests of the Scalar Expectancy Theory (SET) and the Learning-to-Time (LeT) model in a temporal bisection task.在时间二等分任务中对标量期望理论(SET)和时间学习(LeT)模型的进一步测试。
Behav Processes. 2006 Jun 1;72(3):195-206. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.03.001. Epub 2006 Mar 7.
10
Testing the scalar expectancy theory (SET) and the learning-to-time model (LeT) in a double bisection task.在双平分任务中测试标量期望理论(SET)和定时学习模型(LeT)。
Learn Behav. 2005 Feb;33(1):111-22. doi: 10.3758/bf03196055.