The Pain Treatment Center of the Bluegrass, Lexington, KY, USA.
Pain Med. 2012 Jul;13(7):886-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01414.x. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
Several prominent guidelines recommend that patients on long-term opioid therapy have periodic urine drug monitoring (UDM) for appropriate use; however, none address the specific questions of which patients to test, which substances to test for, how often to test, and how to act on the results.
In the absence of adequate scientific evidence in the literature, a panel of experts in the field of pain and addiction medicine was convened to develop consensus UDM recommendations. The panel met three times between March 2010 and April 2011, and reviewed several drafts of the recommendations document between meetings.
The group was able to achieve consensus on a set of UDM recommendations addressing test selection, test frequency, interpretation of results, and how to handle discrepancies based on specific results.
While the participating panel members recognize that there currently is a limited evidence base to support the expert panel's recommendations, primary care providers and pain specialists are largely acting today based on anecdote, intuition, and individual experience. The recommendations are meant to begin to provide a framework for standardizing practices for UDM in the treatment of chronic pain, and to serve as a catalyst to advance research that quantifies the effects of UDM on opioid therapy management and patient outcomes.
几项重要的指南建议长期接受阿片类药物治疗的患者定期进行尿液药物监测(UDM),以确保其合理使用;然而,这些指南都没有具体解决应检测哪些患者、检测哪些物质、多久检测一次以及如何根据检测结果采取行动等问题。
在文献中缺乏充分的科学证据的情况下,召集了疼痛和成瘾医学领域的专家小组,以制定 UDM 共识推荐意见。该小组于 2010 年 3 月至 2011 年 4 月期间召开了三次会议,在会议之间还审议了几份推荐意见草案。
专家组就一套 UDM 推荐意见达成了共识,这些意见涉及测试选择、测试频率、结果解释以及如何根据具体结果处理差异。
尽管参与的专家组认识到目前支持专家组建议的证据基础有限,但初级保健提供者和疼痛专家在很大程度上是根据传闻、直觉和个人经验来进行操作的。这些建议旨在为慢性疼痛治疗中的 UDM 实践标准化提供框架,并作为促进研究的催化剂,以量化 UDM 对阿片类药物治疗管理和患者结果的影响。