• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健医生对电子处方的采用和使用情况。

Adoption of and experience with e-prescribing by primary care physicians.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Administration, The University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, Faser Hall, Room 223, PO Box 1848, University, MS 38677, USA.

出版信息

Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 Jan-Feb;9(1):120-8. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.04.003
PMID:22695213
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impetus of electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) is the reduction of preventable medication errors by generating a legible prescription checked via e-prescribing software for drug-drug and other interactions. Although the adoption of e-prescribing among physicians is growing, the Institute of Medicine's recommendations that all prescriptions be routed electronically by 2010 certainly has not been met.

OBJECTIVES

To provide an update on e-prescribing use among primary care physicians (PCPs), describe their experience with e-prescribing, and provide insight into prescribers' decisions to implement e-prescribing in their practices.

METHODS

An Internet-based survey was administered to a national convenience sample of physicians. The respondents were categorized into e-prescribers or non-e-prescribers. Data to describe demographic characteristics, respondents' experiences with e-prescribing, and respondents' decision to implement e-prescribing were collected. Nonparametric tests were used to test differences in the factors influencing e-prescribers' and traditional prescribers' decisions about electronic prescription implementation.

RESULTS

Four hundred forty-three PCPs participated in the study. There were no significant differences in the demographic characteristics of e-prescribers and non-e-prescribers. Most e-prescribers (83%) reported satisfaction with their e-prescribing system and a preference for e-prescribing over traditional prescribing. Although 22% of respondents indicated that they have started and stopped e-prescribing, most have resumed or intended to resume e-prescribing in the near future. More than half of the respondents reported that they are experiencing problems with their e-prescribing software.

CONCLUSIONS

E-prescribing appears to be present in many types of primary care practices and geographic areas of the country. Despite their satisfaction with and preference for e-prescribing, PCPs still appear to be experiencing problems with e-prescribing software. Implications of these study results for the pharmacy profession are discussed.

摘要

背景

电子处方(e-prescribing)的推动力是通过电子处方软件生成可识别的处方来检查药物相互作用和其他相互作用,从而减少可预防的药物错误。尽管医生采用电子处方的比例正在增长,但医学研究所建议到 2010 年所有处方都应通过电子方式发送,这一目标肯定没有实现。

目的

提供初级保健医生(PCP)电子处方使用情况的最新信息,描述他们使用电子处方的经验,并深入了解医生在实践中实施电子处方的决策。

方法

对全国便利样本的医生进行了基于互联网的调查。受访者分为电子处方者和非电子处方者。收集了描述人口统计学特征、受访者使用电子处方的经验以及受访者决定在实践中实施电子处方的数据。使用非参数检验来检验影响电子处方者和传统处方者电子处方实施决策的因素的差异。

结果

443 名 PCP 参与了这项研究。电子处方者和非电子处方者的人口统计学特征没有显著差异。大多数电子处方者(83%)对他们的电子处方系统表示满意,并更喜欢电子处方而不是传统处方。尽管有 22%的受访者表示他们已经开始并停止使用电子处方,但大多数人已经或打算在不久的将来重新开始使用电子处方。超过一半的受访者报告他们在使用电子处方软件时遇到问题。

结论

电子处方似乎在许多类型的初级保健实践和全国各地的地理区域都存在。尽管 PCP 对电子处方的满意度和偏好,但他们似乎仍然在电子处方软件方面遇到问题。讨论了这些研究结果对药学专业的影响。

相似文献

1
Adoption of and experience with e-prescribing by primary care physicians.初级保健医生对电子处方的采用和使用情况。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 Jan-Feb;9(1):120-8. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
2
Clinicians' assessments of electronic medication safety alerts in ambulatory care.临床医生对门诊医疗中电子药物安全警报的评估。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Sep 28;169(17):1627-32. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.300.
3
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.
4
Appropriate medication prescribing in elderly patients: how knowledgeable are primary care physicians? A survey study in Parma, Italy.老年患者的合理药物处方:初级保健医生的知识水平如何?意大利帕尔马的一项调查研究。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2011 Aug;36(4):468-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2010.01195.x. Epub 2010 Oct 19.
5
Assessing the value of electronic prescribing in ambulatory care: a focus group study.评估门诊医疗中电子处方的价值:一项焦点小组研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2009 Sep;78(9):571-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.03.007. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
6
Differences between integrated and stand-alone E-prescribing systems have implications for future use.整合式与独立式电子处方系统之间的差异对未来的使用有影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Dec;29(12):2268-77. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0557.
7
The influence of payer mix on electronic prescribing by physicians.支付方组合对医生电子处方的影响。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2011 Jan-Mar;36(1):95-101. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3181dc8246.
8
Initiating inhaled steroid treatment for children with asthma in the emergency room: current reported prescribing rates and frequently cited barriers.在急诊室为哮喘儿童启动吸入性类固醇治疗:当前报告的处方率及常被提及的障碍
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Sep;29(9):957-62. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182a219d0.
9
The medical office of the 21st century (MOXXI): effectiveness of computerized decision-making support in reducing inappropriate prescribing in primary care.21世纪医疗办公室(MOXXI):计算机化决策支持在减少初级保健中不适当处方方面的有效性。
CMAJ. 2003 Sep 16;169(6):549-56.
10
Even when physicians adopt e-prescribing, use of advanced features lags.即使医生采用电子处方,先进功能的使用也滞后。
Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2010 Jul(133):1-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of eHealth use on general practice workload in the pre-COVID-19 era: a systematic review.电子健康使用对大流行前普通实践工作量的影响:系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):1099. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11524-9.
2
Prescription Precision: A Comprehensive Review of Intelligent Prescription Systems.**处方精准度**:智能处方系统全面综述
Curr Pharm Des. 2024;30(34):2671-2684. doi: 10.2174/0113816128321623240719104337.
3
Challenges and advantages of electronic prescribing system: a survey study and thematic analysis.
电子处方系统的挑战与优势:一项调查研究和主题分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 30;24(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11144-3.
4
Association of Electronic Prescribing of Controlled Substances With Opioid Prescribing Rates.电子开具受控物质处方与阿片类药物处方率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2027951. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27951.
5
Impacts of Operational Failures on Primary Care Physicians' Work: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of the Literature.操作性失误对基层医疗医师工作的影响:文献的批判性综合分析。
Ann Fam Med. 2020 Mar;18(2):159-168. doi: 10.1370/afm.2485.
6
Why do Belgian Community Pharmacists Still Treat Electronic Prescriptions as Paper-Based?为什么比利时社区药剂师仍将电子处方视为纸质处方?
J Med Syst. 2019 Oct 23;43(11):327. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1456-5.
7
Evaluation of Transition to Electronic Prescriptions in Turkey: Perspective of Family Physicians.土耳其电子处方过渡评估:家庭医生视角。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Jan 1;8(1):40-48. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.89.
8
Factors Affecting Rural Patients' Primary Compliance with e-Prescription: A Developing Country Perspective.影响农村患者对电子处方初始依从性的因素:发展中国家视角
Telemed J E Health. 2019 May;25(5):391-398. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0081. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
9
Impact of Information Technology, Clinical Resource Constraints, and Patient-Centered Practice Characteristics on Quality of Care.信息技术、临床资源限制及以患者为中心的实践特征对医疗质量的影响。
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2015 Feb 13;2:2333392815572340. doi: 10.1177/2333392815572340. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.
10
The effects of introducing an electronic prescription system with no copayments.引入无自付费用的电子处方系统的效果。
Health Econ Rev. 2015 Dec;5(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13561-015-0056-4. Epub 2015 Jul 16.