Suppr超能文献

经结膜无缝线玻璃体切除术与 20 号玻璃体切除术治疗玻璃视网膜手术:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy versus 20-gauge vitrectomy for vitreoretinal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai First People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, 100 Haining Road, Shanghai 200080, China.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar;251(3):681-8. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2077-6. Epub 2012 Jun 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy is appealing to vitreoretinal surgeons around the world. However, its use versus 20-gauge vitreoretinal surgery is still controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the safety and functional outcomes of transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy versus 20-gauge vitrectomy for vitreoretinal surgery.

METHODS

Data sources, including PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, were searched to identify potentially relevant randomized controlled trials. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. The primary factors included patients' discomfort, operating time and early postoperative complications. Visual acuity and surgically induced astigmatism were chosen as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 471 participants with 479 eyes in eight trials between 2005 and 2011 were analyzed. Transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy was associated with significantly fewer patients suffering from postoperative discomfort at 1 day (odds ratio [OR] 0.07; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.01 to 0.49; p = 0.007) and 7 days (OR 0.14; 95 % CI 0.03 to 0.73; p = 0.02) follow-up, and was more effective in reducing surgically induced astigmatism (mean difference -0.23D; 95 % CI -0.31 to -0.15; p < 0.00001) compared to 20-gauge vitrectomy. The sutureless group achieved shorter wound opening (mean difference -1.97 minutes; 95 % CI -2.69 to -1.25; p < 0.00001) as well as wound closure time (mean difference -4.55 minutes; 95 % CI -5.43 to -3.66; p < 0.00001), but the overall surgery time was comparable (mean difference -0.14 minutes; 95 % CI -3.52 to 3.24; p = 0.93). There were no significant differences in the complication rates between the two groups with the exception of postoperative hypotony, which was more likely with the sutureless group (OR 3.73; 95 % CI 1.43 to 9.76; p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

According to the present data, transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy offered significantly less postoperative discomfort and decreased surgically induced astigmatism without increasing the risk of vision-threatening complications. Further trials with contemporary equipment and larger sample size are suggested to confirm this conclusion.

摘要

背景

经结膜无缝线玻璃体切除术吸引了世界各地的眼内视光外科医生。然而,其与 20 号玻璃体切割术的使用仍存在争议。本荟萃分析的目的是比较经结膜无缝线玻璃体切除术与 20 号玻璃体切割术治疗眼内视光的安全性和功能结果。

方法

检索了包括 PubMed、Medline、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 对照试验注册中心在内的数据源,以确定潜在的相关随机对照试验。使用 RevMan 5.0 软件进行荟萃分析。主要因素包括患者的不适、手术时间和术后早期并发症。视力和手术引起的散光被选为次要结果。

结果

2005 年至 2011 年间进行的八项试验共纳入 471 名参与者(479 只眼)。与 20 号玻璃体切割术相比,经结膜无缝线玻璃体切除术在术后 1 天(比值比 [OR] 0.07;95 %置信区间 [CI] 0.01 至 0.49;p = 0.007)和术后 7 天(OR 0.14;95 %CI 0.03 至 0.73;p = 0.02)时,术后不适感显著减少,且在减少手术引起的散光方面更有效(平均差异-0.23D;95 %CI -0.31 至 -0.15;p < 0.00001)。与 20 号玻璃体切割术相比,无缝线组的切口开放时间(平均差值-1.97 分钟;95 %CI -2.69 至 -1.25;p < 0.00001)和切口闭合时间(平均差值-4.55 分钟;95 %CI -5.43 至 -3.66;p < 0.00001)均缩短,但总体手术时间相当(平均差值-0.14 分钟;95 %CI -3.52 至 3.24;p = 0.93)。两组的并发症发生率无显著差异,但无缝线组术后低眼压的可能性更高(OR 3.73;95 %CI 1.43 至 9.76;p = 0.007)。

结论

根据目前的数据,经结膜无缝线玻璃体切除术术后不适感明显减轻,手术引起的散光减少,且不会增加威胁视力的并发症风险。建议进行进一步的研究,使用现代设备和更大的样本量来证实这一结论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验