Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai First People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, 100 Haining Road, Shanghai 200080, China.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar;251(3):681-8. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2077-6. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
Transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy is appealing to vitreoretinal surgeons around the world. However, its use versus 20-gauge vitreoretinal surgery is still controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the safety and functional outcomes of transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy versus 20-gauge vitrectomy for vitreoretinal surgery.
Data sources, including PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, were searched to identify potentially relevant randomized controlled trials. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. The primary factors included patients' discomfort, operating time and early postoperative complications. Visual acuity and surgically induced astigmatism were chosen as secondary outcomes.
A total of 471 participants with 479 eyes in eight trials between 2005 and 2011 were analyzed. Transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy was associated with significantly fewer patients suffering from postoperative discomfort at 1 day (odds ratio [OR] 0.07; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.01 to 0.49; p = 0.007) and 7 days (OR 0.14; 95 % CI 0.03 to 0.73; p = 0.02) follow-up, and was more effective in reducing surgically induced astigmatism (mean difference -0.23D; 95 % CI -0.31 to -0.15; p < 0.00001) compared to 20-gauge vitrectomy. The sutureless group achieved shorter wound opening (mean difference -1.97 minutes; 95 % CI -2.69 to -1.25; p < 0.00001) as well as wound closure time (mean difference -4.55 minutes; 95 % CI -5.43 to -3.66; p < 0.00001), but the overall surgery time was comparable (mean difference -0.14 minutes; 95 % CI -3.52 to 3.24; p = 0.93). There were no significant differences in the complication rates between the two groups with the exception of postoperative hypotony, which was more likely with the sutureless group (OR 3.73; 95 % CI 1.43 to 9.76; p = 0.007).
According to the present data, transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy offered significantly less postoperative discomfort and decreased surgically induced astigmatism without increasing the risk of vision-threatening complications. Further trials with contemporary equipment and larger sample size are suggested to confirm this conclusion.
经结膜无缝线玻璃体切除术吸引了世界各地的眼内视光外科医生。然而,其与 20 号玻璃体切割术的使用仍存在争议。本荟萃分析的目的是比较经结膜无缝线玻璃体切除术与 20 号玻璃体切割术治疗眼内视光的安全性和功能结果。
检索了包括 PubMed、Medline、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 对照试验注册中心在内的数据源,以确定潜在的相关随机对照试验。使用 RevMan 5.0 软件进行荟萃分析。主要因素包括患者的不适、手术时间和术后早期并发症。视力和手术引起的散光被选为次要结果。
2005 年至 2011 年间进行的八项试验共纳入 471 名参与者(479 只眼)。与 20 号玻璃体切割术相比,经结膜无缝线玻璃体切除术在术后 1 天(比值比 [OR] 0.07;95 %置信区间 [CI] 0.01 至 0.49;p = 0.007)和术后 7 天(OR 0.14;95 %CI 0.03 至 0.73;p = 0.02)时,术后不适感显著减少,且在减少手术引起的散光方面更有效(平均差异-0.23D;95 %CI -0.31 至 -0.15;p < 0.00001)。与 20 号玻璃体切割术相比,无缝线组的切口开放时间(平均差值-1.97 分钟;95 %CI -2.69 至 -1.25;p < 0.00001)和切口闭合时间(平均差值-4.55 分钟;95 %CI -5.43 至 -3.66;p < 0.00001)均缩短,但总体手术时间相当(平均差值-0.14 分钟;95 %CI -3.52 至 3.24;p = 0.93)。两组的并发症发生率无显著差异,但无缝线组术后低眼压的可能性更高(OR 3.73;95 %CI 1.43 至 9.76;p = 0.007)。
根据目前的数据,经结膜无缝线玻璃体切除术术后不适感明显减轻,手术引起的散光减少,且不会增加威胁视力的并发症风险。建议进行进一步的研究,使用现代设备和更大的样本量来证实这一结论。