Barlow Jane, Smailagic Nadja, Huband Nick, Roloff Verena, Bennett Cathy
Health Sciences Research Unit, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13(6):CD002020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002020.pub3.
Parental psychosocial health can have a significant effect on the parent-child relationship, with consequences for the later psychological health of the child. Parenting programmes have been shown to have an impact on the emotional and behavioural adjustment of children, but there have been no reviews to date of their impact on parental psychosocial wellbeing.
To address whether group-based parenting programmes are effective in improving parental psychosocial wellbeing (for example, anxiety, depression, guilt, confidence).
We searched the following databases on 5 December 2012: CENTRAL (2011, Issue 4), MEDLINE (1950 to November 2011), EMBASE (1980 to week 48, 2011), BIOSIS (1970 to 2 December 2011), CINAHL (1982 to November 2011), PsycINFO (1970 to November week 5, 2011), ERIC (1966 to November 2011), Sociological Abstracts (1952 to November 2011), Social Science Citation Index (1970 to 2 December 2011), metaRegister of Controlled Trials (5 December 2011), NSPCC Library (5 December 2011). We searched ASSIA (1980 to current) on 10 November 2012 and the National Research Register was last searched in 2005.
We included randomised controlled trials that compared a group-based parenting programme with a control condition and used at least one standardised measure of parental psychosocial health. Control conditions could be waiting-list, no treatment, treatment as usual or a placebo.
At least two review authors extracted data independently and assessed the risk of bias in each study. We examined the studies for any information on adverse effects. We contacted authors where information was missing from trial reports. We standardised the treatment effect for each outcome in each study by dividing the mean difference in post-intervention scores between the intervention and control groups by the pooled standard deviation.
We included 48 studies that involved 4937 participants and covered three types of programme: behavioural, cognitive-behavioural and multimodal. Overall, we found that group-based parenting programmes led to statistically significant short-term improvements in depression (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.28 to -0.07), anxiety (SMD -0.22, 95% CI -0.43 to -0.01), stress (SMD -0.29, 95% CI -0.42 to -0.15), anger (SMD -0.60, 95% CI -1.00 to -0.20), guilt (SMD -0.79, 95% CI -1.18 to -0.41), confidence (SMD -0.34, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.17) and satisfaction with the partner relationship (SMD -0.28, 95% CI -0.47 to -0.09). However, only stress and confidence continued to be statistically significant at six month follow-up, and none were significant at one year. There was no evidence of any effect on self-esteem (SMD -0.01, 95% CI -0.45 to 0.42). None of the trials reported on aggression or adverse effects.The limited data that explicitly focused on outcomes for fathers showed a statistically significant short-term improvement in paternal stress (SMD -0.43, 95% CI -0.79 to -0.06). We were unable to combine data for other outcomes and individual study results were inconclusive in terms of any effect on depressive symptoms, confidence or partner satisfaction.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review support the use of parenting programmes to improve the short-term psychosocial wellbeing of parents. Further input may be required to ensure that these results are maintained. More research is needed that explicitly addresses the benefits for fathers, and that examines the comparative effectiveness of different types of programme along with the mechanisms by which such programmes bring about improvements in parental psychosocial functioning.
父母的心理社会健康会对亲子关系产生重大影响,进而影响孩子日后的心理健康。育儿项目已被证明会对孩子的情绪和行为调适产生影响,但迄今为止,尚无关于其对父母心理社会幸福感影响的综述。
探讨基于小组的育儿项目是否能有效改善父母的心理社会幸福感(如焦虑、抑郁、内疚、信心)。
我们于2012年12月5日检索了以下数据库:Cochrane系统评价数据库(2011年第4期)、医学索引数据库(1950年至2011年11月)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(1980年至2011年第48周)、生物学文摘数据库(1970年至2011年12月2日)、护理学与健康照护数据库(1982年至2011年11月)、心理学文摘数据库(1970年至2011年第5周)、教育资源信息中心数据库(1966年至2011年11月)、社会学文摘数据库(1952年至2011年11月)、社会科学引文索引数据库(1970年至2011年12月2日)、对照试验元注册库(2011年12月5日)、英国全国防止虐待儿童协会图书馆(2011年12月5日)。我们于2012年11月10日检索了亚太社会科学索引数据库(1980年至今),国家研究注册库最后一次检索时间为2005年。
我们纳入了将基于小组的育儿项目与对照条件进行比较,并使用至少一种父母心理社会健康标准化测量方法的随机对照试验。对照条件可以是等候名单、不治疗、常规治疗或安慰剂。
至少两名综述作者独立提取数据,并评估每项研究的偏倚风险。我们检查研究中关于不良反应的任何信息。若试验报告中信息缺失,我们会联系作者。我们通过将干预组与对照组干预后分数的平均差值除以合并标准差,对每项研究中每个结局的治疗效果进行标准化。
我们纳入了48项研究,涉及4937名参与者,涵盖三种类型的项目:行为型、认知行为型和多模式型。总体而言,我们发现基于小组的育儿项目在短期内能使抑郁(标准化均数差值(SMD)-0.17,95%置信区间(CI)-0.28至-0.07)、焦虑(SMD -0.22,95% CI -0.43至-0.01)、压力(SMD -0.29,95% CI -0.42至-0.15)、愤怒(SMD -0.60,95% CI -1.00至-0.20)、内疚(SMD -0.79,95% CI -1.18至-当研究报告中信息缺失时,我们会联系作者。我们通过将干预组与对照组干预后分数的平均差值除以合并标准差,对每项研究中每个结局的治疗效果进行标准化。
我们纳入了48项研究,涉及4937名参与者,涵盖三种类型的项目:行为型、认知行为型和多模式型。总体而言,我们发现基于小组的育儿项目在短期内能使抑郁(标准化均数差值(SMD)-0.17,95%置信区间(CI)-0.28至-0.07)、焦虑(SMD -0.22,95% CI -0.43至-0.01)、压力(SMD -0.29,95% CI -0.42至-0.15)、愤怒(SMD -0.60,95% CI -1.00至-0.20)、内疚(SMD -0.79,95% CI -1.18至-0.41)、信心(SMD -0.34,95% CI -0.51至-0.17)以及对伴侣关系的满意度(SMD -0.28,95% CI -0.47至-0.09)在统计学上有显著改善。然而,仅压力和信心在6个月随访时仍具有统计学显著性,1年时均无显著性。没有证据表明对自尊有任何影响(SMD -0.01,95% CI -0.45至0.42)。没有试验报告攻击行为或不良反应。明确关注父亲结局的有限数据显示,父亲的压力在短期内有统计学显著改善(SMD -0.43,95% CI -0.79至-0.06)。我们无法合并其他结局的数据,就对抑郁症状、信心或伴侣满意度的任何影响而言,个别研究结果尚无定论。
本综述的结果支持使用育儿项目来改善父母的短期心理社会幸福感。可能需要进一步投入以确保维持这些结果。需要更多研究明确探讨对父亲的益处,以及考察不同类型项目的相对有效性及其改善父母心理社会功能的机制。