Xiao Yousheng, Luo Man, Wang Jin, Luo Hongye
Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University,Nanning, China.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13(6):CD009324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009324.pub2.
Epilepsy is a common neurologic disorder, affecting approximately 50 million people worldwide; nearly a third of these people are not well controlled by a single antiepileptic drug and usually require treatment with a combination of two or more antiepileptic drugs. In recent years, many newer antiepileptic drugs have been investigated as add-on therapy for partial epilepsy; losigamone is one of these drugs and is the focus of this systematic review.
To investigate the efficacy and safety of losigamone when used as an add-on therapy for partial epilepsy.
We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register (1 May 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL Issue 4 of 12, The Cochrane Library, 2012) and MEDLINE (1 May 2012). We searched trials registers and contacted the manufacturer of losigamone and authors of included studies for additional information. There were no language restrictions.
Randomized controlled add-on trials comparing losigamone with placebo for partial epilepsy.
Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. The primary outcomes were 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency and seizure freedom; the secondary outcomes were treatment withdrawal and adverse events. Results are presented as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) or 99% CIs (for the individual listed adverse events to make an allowance for multiple testing).
Two trials involving a total of 467 patients were eligible for inclusion. Both trials assessed losigamone 1200 or 1500 mg/d as an add-on therapy for partial epilepsy. One trial was assessed as being of good methodologic quality while the other was of uncertain quality. For the efficacy outcomes, results did show patients taking losigamone were significantly more likely to achieve a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency (RR 1.75; 95% CI 1.14 to 2.72), but associated with a significant increase of treatment withdrawal when compared with those taking placebo (RR 2.16; 95% CI 1.28 to 3.67). For the safety outcomes, results indicated the proportion of patients who experienced adverse events in the losigamone group was higher than the placebo group (RR 1.34; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.80), dizziness was the only adverse event significantly in relation to losigamone (RR 3.82; 99% CI 1.69 to 8.64). The proportion of patients achieving seizure freedom was not reported in either trial report. A subgroup analysis according to different doses of losigamone showed that a higher dose of losigamone (1500 mg/d) is associated with a greater reduction in seizure frequency than lower doses, but is also associated with more dropouts due to adverse events.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review showed losigamone can reduce seizure frequency but was associated with more treatment withdrawals when used as an add-on therapy for people with partial epilepsy. However, trials included were of short-term duration and uncertain quality. Future well-designed randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with a longer-term duration are needed.
癫痫是一种常见的神经系统疾病,全球约有5000万人受其影响;其中近三分之一的患者无法通过单一抗癫痫药物得到有效控制,通常需要两种或更多种抗癫痫药物联合治疗。近年来,许多新型抗癫痫药物被研究用于部分性癫痫的附加治疗;洛西加莫酮就是其中之一,也是本系统评价的重点。
研究洛西加莫酮作为部分性癫痫附加治疗的疗效和安全性。
我们检索了Cochrane癫痫小组专业注册库(2012年5月1日)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》2012年第12期第4卷)和MEDLINE(2012年5月1日)。我们检索了试验注册库,并联系了洛西加莫酮的制造商以及纳入研究的作者以获取更多信息。没有语言限制。
比较洛西加莫酮与安慰剂用于部分性癫痫的随机对照附加试验。
两位综述作者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。主要结局为癫痫发作频率降低50%或更多以及无癫痫发作;次要结局为治疗退出和不良事件。结果以风险比(RR)及95%置信区间(CI)或99%CI(针对个别列出的不良事件以考虑多重检验)呈现。
两项共涉及467例患者的试验符合纳入标准。两项试验均评估了洛西加莫酮1200或1500mg/d作为部分性癫痫附加治疗的效果。一项试验的方法学质量被评估为良好,另一项质量不确定。对于疗效结局,结果确实显示服用洛西加莫酮的患者癫痫发作频率降低50%或更多的可能性显著更高(RR 1.75;95%CI 1.14至2.72),但与服用安慰剂的患者相比,治疗退出显著增加(RR 2.16;95%CI 1.28至3.67)。对于安全性结局,结果表明洛西加莫酮组发生不良事件的患者比例高于安慰剂组(RR 1.34;95%CI 1.00至1.80),头晕是唯一与洛西加莫酮显著相关的不良事件(RR 3.82;99%CI 1.69至8.64)。两项试验报告均未报告无癫痫发作患者的比例。根据不同剂量的洛西加莫酮进行的亚组分析表明,较高剂量的洛西加莫酮(1500mg/d)与较低剂量相比,癫痫发作频率降低幅度更大,但也与更多因不良事件导致的退出有关。
本综述结果表明,洛西加莫酮可降低癫痫发作频率,但作为部分性癫痫患者的附加治疗时,与更多的治疗退出相关。然而,纳入的试验持续时间较短且质量不确定。未来需要设计良好的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的长期试验。