Winnock de Grave Philip, Tampere Thomas, Byn Pieter, Van Overschelde John, Pattyn Christophe, Verdonk René
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Acta Orthop Belg. 2012 Apr;78(2):192-8.
We report the results of a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the Gamma 3 nail with the ACE trochanteric nail for the treatment of pertrochanteric femoral fractures. One hundred and twelve consecutive patients were enrolled in the study: 61 patients were treated with the Gamma 3 nail, 51 with the ACE trochanteric nail. The two groups were matched for age, fracture type and preoperative Merle d'Aubigné hip score. All patients were followed up clinically and radiographically on a regular basis between 6 weeks and one year postoperatively. Twenty-six patients (23%) died within the first postoperative year. Six patients were lost to follow-up. In each group, two patients were revised due to mechanical failure. Nonunion did not occur. The mean postoperative hip scores in the Gamma 3 and the ACE group were 14.19 and 14.12 respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.92). Walking ability was adequately restored in approximately 80% of the patients. Both implants appeared as safe and effective methods of treatment for intertrochanteric hip fractures.
我们报告了一项前瞻性随机临床试验的结果,该试验比较了Gamma 3钉与ACE股骨转子钉治疗股骨转子间骨折的效果。连续112例患者纳入本研究:61例患者接受Gamma 3钉治疗,51例接受ACE股骨转子钉治疗。两组在年龄、骨折类型和术前Merle d'Aubigné髋关节评分方面相匹配。所有患者在术后6周和1年之间定期进行临床和影像学随访。26例患者(23%)在术后第一年内死亡。6例患者失访。每组有2例患者因机械故障进行了翻修。未发生骨不连。Gamma 3组和ACE组术后髋关节平均评分分别为14.19和14.12,无显著差异(p = 0.92)。约80%的患者行走能力得到充分恢复。两种植入物均显示为治疗转子间髋部骨折的安全有效方法。