Hess Kristen L, Gorbach Pamina M, Manhart Lisa E, Stoner Bradley P, Martin David H, Holmes King K
Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Sex Health. 2012 Jul;9(3):280-7. doi: 10.1071/SH11047.
Concurrent sexual partnerships can increase sexually transmissible infections (STI) transmission on a population level. However, different concurrency types may be associated with differential risks for transmission. To investigate this, we describe the prevalence and correlates of four specific concurrency types.
Between 2001 and 2004, 1098 young adults attending three STI clinics were interviewed and tested for STIs. Characteristics associated with concurrency types were identified using logistic regression.
Approximately one-third of respondents reported reactive (34%), transitional (36%), compensatory (32%) and experimental (26%) concurrency. Among men, reactive concurrency was associated with not identifying as heterosexual, drug use and having sex the same day as meeting a partner. Among women, reactive concurrency was associated with African-American race and having >3 lifetime partners. Transitional concurrency was associated with >3 lifetime partners for men and women. Among men, compensatory concurrency was associated with African-American race; among women, there were no associations with compensatory concurrency. Among men, experimental concurrency was associated with >3 lifetime partners and having sex the same day as meeting a partner. Among women, experimental concurrency was associated with not identifying as heterosexual, drug use and having sex the same day as meeting a partner.
All concurrency types were common in this population and each was associated with a set of demographic and risk factors. Reactive and experimental concurrency types were associated with other high-risk behaviours, such as drug use.
同时存在多个性伴侣会在人群层面增加性传播感染(STI)的传播风险。然而,不同类型的性伴侣重叠可能与不同的传播风险相关。为了对此进行研究,我们描述了四种特定性伴侣重叠类型的患病率及其相关因素。
在2001年至2004年期间,对前往三家性传播感染诊所就诊的1098名年轻人进行了访谈并检测了性传播感染。使用逻辑回归确定与性伴侣重叠类型相关的特征。
约三分之一的受访者报告了反应性(34%)、过渡性(36%)、补偿性(32%)和尝试性(26%)性伴侣重叠情况。在男性中,反应性性伴侣重叠与不认同自己为异性恋、吸毒以及与伴侣相遇当天发生性行为有关。在女性中,反应性性伴侣重叠与非裔美国人种族以及一生中有超过3个性伴侣有关。过渡性性伴侣重叠在男性和女性中均与一生中有超过3个性伴侣有关。在男性中,补偿性性伴侣重叠与非裔美国人种族有关;在女性中,补偿性性伴侣重叠无相关因素。在男性中,尝试性性伴侣重叠与一生中有超过3个性伴侣以及与伴侣相遇当天发生性行为有关。在女性中,尝试性性伴侣重叠与不认同自己为异性恋、吸毒以及与伴侣相遇当天发生性行为有关。
所有性伴侣重叠类型在该人群中都很常见,且每种类型都与一系列人口统计学和风险因素相关。反应性和尝试性性伴侣重叠类型与其他高风险行为有关,如吸毒。