Neuroscience Program, The Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, 405 North Mathews Avenue, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Neuroscience. 2012 Sep 6;219:62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.06.007. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
Previous studies have shown that housing mice with toys and running wheels increases adult hippocampal neurogenesis and enhances performance on the water maze. However, the relative contribution of running versus enrichment to the neurogenic and pro-cognitive effects is not clear. Recently, it was demonstrated that enrichment devoid of running wheels does not significantly enhance adult hippocampal neurogenesis in female C57BL/6J mice. However, novel toys were not rotated into the cages, and dietary enrichment was not included, so it could be argued that the environment was not enriched enough. In addition, only females were studied, and animals were group-housed, making it impossible to record individual running behavior or to determine the time spent running versus exploring the toys. Therefore, we repeated the study in singly housed male C57BL/6J mice and enhanced enrichment by rotating novel tactile, visual, dietary, auditory, and vestibular stimuli into the cages. Mice were housed for 32 days in one of four groups: running-only, enrichment-only, running plus enrichment, and standard cage. The first 10 days bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) was administered to label dividing cells. The last 5 days mice were tested on the water maze, and then euthanized to measure number of BrdU cells co-labeled with neuronal nuclear marker (NeuN) in the dentate gyrus. Mice in the running-only group ran, on average, equivalent distances as animals in the running plus enrichment group. The combination of enrichment and running did not significantly increase hippocampal neurogenesis any more than running alone did. Animals in the running-only condition were the only group to show enhanced acquisition on water maze relative to standard cage controls. We confirm and extend the conclusion that environmental enrichment alone does not significantly increase hippocampal neurogenesis or bestow spatial learning benefits in male C57BL/6J mice, even when the modalities of enrichment are very broad.
先前的研究表明,给老鼠提供玩具和跑步轮会增加成年海马体神经发生,并提高其在水迷宫中的表现。然而,跑步和丰富环境对神经发生和认知促进的相对贡献尚不清楚。最近,研究表明,缺乏跑步轮的丰富环境并不能显著增加雌性 C57BL/6J 小鼠的成年海马体神经发生。然而,新的玩具并没有被轮换到笼子里,也没有提供饮食上的丰富,因此可以说环境还不够丰富。此外,研究只涉及了雌性动物,而且动物是群体饲养的,这使得无法记录个体的跑步行为或确定它们是在跑步还是在探索玩具上花费了更多的时间。因此,我们在单独饲养的雄性 C57BL/6J 小鼠中重复了这项研究,并通过将新的触觉、视觉、饮食、听觉和前庭刺激物轮换到笼子里来增强丰富环境。将小鼠分为四组,每组饲养 32 天:只跑步、只丰富环境、跑步加丰富环境和标准笼。在最初的 10 天里,给小鼠注射溴脱氧尿苷(BrdU)以标记分裂细胞。在最后的 5 天里,小鼠在水迷宫上进行测试,然后安乐死,以测量齿状回中 BrdU 细胞与神经元核标记物(NeuN)共标记的数量。只跑步组的小鼠平均跑动距离与跑步加丰富环境组的小鼠相当。丰富环境和跑步的结合并没有比单独跑步更显著地增加海马体神经发生。只有在只跑步条件下的动物在水迷宫上的获得表现相对于标准笼对照有显著提高。我们证实并扩展了以下结论,即单独的环境丰富并不能显著增加雄性 C57BL/6J 小鼠的海马体神经发生或赋予其空间学习益处,即使丰富的方式非常广泛。