Mackenzie K R, Tschuschke V
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, and the University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
J Psychother Pract Res. 1993 Spring;2(2):147-56.
Process and outcome measures were compared in two long-term groups. The measure "Relatedness" reflected an individual's attachment to and comfort with the group, and "Group Work" indicated perception of the group as having a positive working climate. High Relatedness scores predicted better outcome at 18-month follow-up. Group Work scores were not related to outcome. Relatedness and Group Work scores were not correlated. Results replicate in a group psychotherapy population the importance, reported in individual therapy literature, of an early and sustained positive therapeutic alliance (Relatedness). However, a measure that is closely related to the concept of "working alliance" (Group Work) did not predict outcome.
在两个长期组中对过程和结果指标进行了比较。“相关性”指标反映了个体对群体的依恋程度和在群体中的舒适感，“团队合作”指标表明对群体拥有积极工作氛围的认知。高相关性得分预示着18个月随访时有更好的结果。团队合作得分与结果无关。相关性得分和团队合作得分不相关。研究结果在团体心理治疗人群中重现了个体治疗文献中所报道的早期且持续的积极治疗联盟（相关性）的重要性。然而，一个与“工作联盟”概念密切相关的指标（团队合作）并未预测结果。
