• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

["或者我们仅仅为了[..]不断面对必须永远留在这里的事实而被治愈[..]?”1921年至1937年期间精神科患者对疾病、正常化和常态的看法]

["Or should we be cured just to [..] be constantly confronted with the fact that we have to stay here forever [..]?" The view of psychiatric patients between illness, normalization and normality (1921-1937)].

作者信息

Beyer Christof

机构信息

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Institut für Geschichte, Ethik und Philosophie der Medizin, Hannover.

出版信息

Med Ges Gesch. 2011;30:49-83.

PMID:22701951
Abstract

In German psychiatry, a distinct change occurred in the 1920s with regard to types of treatment. By introducing work therapy, early releases and psychiatric support outside the asylums the number of in-patients was to be reduced. As a consequence social approaches began to dominate psychiatric discourse. These approaches aimed at normalizing everyday life in the institutions and at implementing treatments that would allow patients to be reintegrated into society. Based on numerous documents on a patient who had spent the 1920s and early 1930s in a mental institution, the article adds a patient's view to the psychiatrists' perspective that has so far dominated the history of psychiatry of the Weimar Republic. The documents allow for an in-depth investigation of both the potential and the limitations of the approaches to psychiatric reform prevalent at the time. They illustrate, from a micro-perspective, the field of tension between psychiatric diagnosis, life in the asylum and integration into society that, in the case of this patient, became especially poignant with the patient's release at the time of the Third Reich sterilization laws.

摘要

在德国精神病学领域,20世纪20年代在治疗方式方面发生了显著变化。通过引入工作疗法、提前释放以及精神病院外的心理支持,住院患者的数量得以减少。结果,社会疗法开始在精神病学论述中占据主导地位。这些疗法旨在使机构内的日常生活正常化,并实施能让患者重新融入社会的治疗方法。基于大量关于一名在20世纪20年代至30年代初曾在精神病院住院患者的文件,本文在迄今为止主导魏玛共和国精神病学史的精神病医生视角之外,增添了患者的观点。这些文件有助于深入研究当时盛行的精神病学改革方法的潜力与局限。它们从微观角度展现了精神病诊断、精神病院生活与融入社会之间的紧张关系领域,在这名患者的案例中,随着第三帝国绝育法实施时患者的获释,这种紧张关系变得尤为尖锐。

相似文献

1
["Or should we be cured just to [..] be constantly confronted with the fact that we have to stay here forever [..]?" The view of psychiatric patients between illness, normalization and normality (1921-1937)].["或者我们仅仅为了[..]不断面对必须永远留在这里的事实而被治愈[..]?”1921年至1937年期间精神科患者对疾病、正常化和常态的看法]
Med Ges Gesch. 2011;30:49-83.
2
[Labour, silence and order: visualizing modern psychiatry--strategies for legitimizing Swiss asylum psychiatry in the context of occupational therapy in the interwar period].[劳动、沉默与秩序:现代精神病学的可视化——两次世界大战期间职业治疗背景下瑞士庇护精神病学合法化的策略]
Med Ges Gesch. 2006;26:283-310.
3
[Housing and work as criteria of the "Social Integration" of the mentally ill - development in Germany between 1900 and 2000].[住房与工作作为精神病患者“社会融合”的标准——1900年至2000年间德国的发展情况]
Psychiatr Prax. 2002 Sep;29(6):285-94. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-34041.
4
[Chance meeting of psychiatry and art on the "dissecting table"].[精神病学与艺术在“解剖台”上的邂逅]
Psychiatr Hung. 2015;30(2):145-66.
5
[Inside and outside the asylum. On the dynamics of work as therapy in Weimar Germany].[在疯人院内外。论魏玛德国作为治疗手段的工作动态]
Medizinhist J. 2013;48(3-4):241-72.
6
[Biographies following release from mental hospital, Glasgow 1875-1921].
Med Ges Gesch. 2011;30:9-47.
7
["Querulantenwahnsinn"--insanity or stubbornness?].["抱怨癖性精神错乱"——精神错乱还是固执?]
Med Ges Gesch. 2006;26:395-410.
8
Suicide, mental illness, and psychiatry in Queensland, 1890-1950.1890 - 1950年昆士兰州的自杀、精神疾病与精神病学
Health History. 2009;11(1):102-27.
9
[Asylum: the Huge Psychiatric Hospital in the 19th century U.S].《疯人院:19世纪美国的大型精神病院》
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2012;114(10):1194-200.
10
[Open care--the Rodewisch theses--psychiatry enquete: 3 reform approaches compared].[开放式护理——罗德维希论点——精神病学调查:三种改革方法的比较]
Psychiatr Prax. 2000 Apr;27(3):138-43.