Suppr超能文献

香烟广告中的图形警示标签:召回和浏览模式。

Graphic warning labels in cigarette advertisements: recall and viewing patterns.

机构信息

Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Nicotine Addiction, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-3309, USA.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jul;43(1):41-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.026.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Family Smoking Prevention and Control Act gave the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) legal authority to mandate graphic warning labels on cigarette advertising and packaging. The FDA requires that these graphic warning labels be embedded into cigarette advertising and packaging by September 2012.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to examine differences in recall and viewing patterns of text-only versus graphic cigarette warning labels and the association between viewing patterns and recall.

METHODS

Participants (current daily smokers; N=200) were randomized to view a cigarette advertisement with either text-only or graphic warning labels. Viewing patterns were measured using eye-tracking, and recall was later assessed. Sessions were conducted between November 2008 and November 2009. Data analysis was conducted between March 2011 and July 2011.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in percentage correct recall of the warning label between those in the text-only versus graphic warning label condition, 50% vs 83% (χ(2)=23.74, p=0.0001). Time to first viewing of the graphic warning label text and dwell time duration (i.e., time spent looking) on the graphic image were significantly associated with correct recall. Warning labels that drew attention more quickly and resulted in longer dwell times were associated with better recall.

CONCLUSIONS

Graphic warning labels improve smokers' recall of warning and health risks; these labels do so by drawing and holding attention.

摘要

背景

《家庭吸烟预防与控制法案》赋予美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)法定权力,要求在香烟广告和包装上使用图形警示标签。FDA 要求这些图形警示标签必须在 2012 年 9 月前嵌入香烟广告和包装中。

目的

本研究旨在检验文字与图形香烟警示标签的回忆和观看模式的差异,以及观看模式与回忆之间的关联。

方法

参与者(目前每天吸烟的人;N=200)被随机分配观看带有文字或图形警示标签的香烟广告。使用眼动追踪来测量观看模式,之后评估回忆。研究于 2008 年 11 月至 2009 年 11 月进行,数据分析于 2011 年 3 月至 7 月进行。

结果

在文字警示标签与图形警示标签条件下,正确回忆警示标签的百分比存在显著差异,分别为 50%和 83%(χ(2)=23.74,p=0.0001)。首次观看图形警示标签文字的时间和在图形图像上的停留时间(即观看时间)与正确回忆显著相关。更快地引起注意并导致更长停留时间的警示标签与更好的回忆相关。

结论

图形警示标签提高了吸烟者对警示和健康风险的回忆;这些标签通过吸引和保持注意力来实现这一点。

相似文献

1
Graphic warning labels in cigarette advertisements: recall and viewing patterns.
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jul;43(1):41-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.026.
2
3
Reactions to FDA-Proposed Graphic Warning Labels Affixed to U.S. Smokers' Cigarette Packs.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Jul;17(7):784-95. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu339. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
5
Optimizing Warnings on E-Cigarette Advertisements.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Apr 21;22(5):630-637. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz091.
7
Does Size Impact Attention and Recall of Graphic Health Warnings?
Tob Regul Sci. 2015 Jul;1(2):175-185. doi: 10.18001/TRS.1.2.7. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
8
Emotional reaction facilitates the brain and behavioural impact of graphic cigarette warning labels in smokers.
Tob Control. 2015 May;24(3):225-32. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051993. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
10
Cigarette warning label policy alternatives and smoking-related health disparities.
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Dec;43(6):590-600. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.08.025.

引用本文的文献

3
The effects of emotional distress on attentional bias toward cigarette warnings according to smokers' anxiety levels.
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 16;15:1411747. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1411747. eCollection 2024.
10
Assessing Attention to Tobacco Warnings With a Heatmapping Task.
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Nov;65(5):809-817. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.05.020. Epub 2023 May 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review.
Tob Control. 2011 Sep;20(5):327-37. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.037630. Epub 2011 May 23.
2
Plain packaging increases visual attention to health warnings on cigarette packs in non-smokers and weekly smokers but not daily smokers.
Addiction. 2011 Aug;106(8):1505-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03430.x. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
3
Smoking cues, argument strength, and perceived effectiveness of antismoking PSAs.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2011 Apr;13(4):282-90. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq255. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
4
Cigarette pack design and perceptions of risk among UK adults and youth.
Eur J Public Health. 2009 Dec;19(6):631-7. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp122. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
5
Impact of graphic and text warnings on cigarette packs: findings from four countries over five years.
Tob Control. 2009 Oct;18(5):358-64. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.028043. Epub 2009 Jun 28.
6
Experimental evaluation of antitobacco PSAs: effects of message content and format on physiological and behavioral outcomes.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 Mar;11(3):293-302. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntn026. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
7
PREP advertisement features affect smokers' beliefs regarding potential harm.
Tob Control. 2008 Sep;17 Suppl 1(0 1):i32-8. doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.022426.
8
The impact and acceptability of Canadian-style cigarette warning labels among U.S. smokers and nonsmokers.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2007 Apr;9(4):473-81. doi: 10.1080/14622200701239639.
10
Evaluating smokers' reactions to advertising for new lower nicotine quest cigarettes.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2006 Mar;20(1):80-4. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.20.1.80.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验