Wang An-Li, Lowen Steven B, Romer Daniel, Giorno Mario, Langleben Daniel D
Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA.
Tob Control. 2015 May;24(3):225-32. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051993. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
Warning labels on cigarette packages are an important venue for information about the hazards of smoking. The 2009 US Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act mandated replacing the current text-only labels with graphic warning labels. However, labels proposed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were challenged in court by the tobacco companies, who argued successfully that the proposed labels needlessly encroached on their right to free speech, in part because they included images of high emotional salience that indiscriminately frightened rather than informed consumers.
We used functional MRI to examine the effects of graphic warning labels' emotional salience on smokers' brain activity and cognition. Twenty-four smokers viewed a random sequence of blocks of graphic warning labels that have been rated high or low on an 'emotional reaction' scale in previous research.
We found that labels rated high on emotional reaction were better remembered, associated with reduction in the urge to smoke, and produced greater brain response in the amygdala, hippocampi, inferior frontal gyri and the insulae.
Recognition memory and craving are, respectively, correlates of effectiveness of addiction-related public health communications and interventions, and amygdala activation facilitates the encoding of emotional memories. Thus, our results suggest that emotional reaction to graphic warning labels contributes to their public health impact and may be an integral part of the neural mechanisms underlying their effectiveness. Given the urgency of the debate about the constitutional risks and public health benefits of graphic warning labels, these preliminary findings warrant consideration while longitudinal clinical studies are underway.
香烟包装上的警示标签是传播吸烟危害信息的重要途径。2009年美国《家庭吸烟预防与烟草控制法案》规定用图形警示标签取代现行的纯文字标签。然而,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)提议的标签遭到了烟草公司的法庭质疑,烟草公司成功辩称,提议的标签不必要地侵犯了他们的言论自由权,部分原因是这些标签包含高度情绪化的图像,这些图像不加区分地吓唬消费者而非为其提供信息。
我们使用功能磁共振成像来研究图形警示标签的情感显著性对吸烟者大脑活动和认知的影响。24名吸烟者观看了一系列随机排列的图形警示标签组块,这些标签在先前研究中根据“情感反应”量表被评为高或低。
我们发现,在情感反应方面被评为高的标签更容易被记住,与吸烟欲望的降低相关,并且在杏仁核、海马体、额下回和脑岛产生更大的大脑反应。
识别记忆和渴望分别与成瘾相关的公共卫生宣传和干预措施的有效性相关,杏仁核激活有助于情感记忆的编码。因此,我们的结果表明,对图形警示标签的情感反应有助于其对公共卫生产生影响,并且可能是其有效性背后神经机制的一个组成部分。鉴于关于图形警示标签的宪法风险和公共卫生益处的辩论的紧迫性,在进行纵向临床研究时,这些初步发现值得考虑。