Suppr超能文献

植被过滤带对猪粪浆中大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌的截留效果。

Effectiveness of vegetated filter strips in retention of Escherichia coli and Salmonella from swine manure slurry.

机构信息

University of Maryland, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, College Park, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2012 Nov 15;110:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.05.012. Epub 2012 Jun 15.

Abstract

Vegetated filter strips (VFS) are commonly recommended as a best management practice to prevent manure-borne microorganisms from reaching surface water resources. However, relatively little is known about the efficacy of VFS in mitigating bacterial runoff from land-applied swine manure. A field lysimeter study was designed to evaluate the effect of surface soil hydrologic conditions and vegetation on the retention of swine manure-borne Escherichia coli and Salmonella under simulated rainfall conditions. Experimental plots (6.5 m × 3.9 m) were set on a 5% slope lysimeter with loamy topsoil, clay loam or loam subsoil and a controllable groundwater level. Three small flow-intercepting miniflumes were installed 4.5 m from the plot's top, while all remaining runoff was collected in a gutter at the bottom. Plots were divided into bare soil and grass vegetation and upper surface soil moisture before rainfall events was controlled by the subsurface groundwater level. Swine manure slurry inoculated with E. coli and Salmonella, and with added bromide tracer, was applied on the top of the plots and simultaneously initiated the simulated rainfall. Runoff was collected and analyzed every 5 min. No substantial differences between retention of E. coli and Salmonella were found. In initially wet soil surface conditions, there was limited infiltration both in bare and in vegetated plots; almost all bromide and about 30% of bacteria were recovered in runoff water. In initially dry soil surface conditions, there were substantial discrepancies between bare and vegetated plots. In bare plots, recoveries of runoff water, bromide and bacteria under dry conditions were comparable to wet conditions. However, in dry vegetated plots, from 50% to 75% of water was lost to infiltration, while bromide recoveries ranged from 14 to 36% and bacteria recovery was only 5%. Substantial intraplot heterogeneity was revealed by the data from miniflumes. GIS analysis of the plot microtopography showed that miniflumes located in the zones of flow convergence collected the majority of bacteria. Overall, the efficiency of VFS, with respect to the retention of swine manure bacteria, varied dramatically depending upon the hydrologic soil surface condition. Consequently, VFS recommendations should account for expected amounts of surface soil water saturation as well as the relative soil water storage capacity of the VFS.

摘要

植被过滤带(VFS)通常被推荐为一种最佳管理实践,以防止粪肥携带的微生物进入地表水。然而,对于 VFS 在减轻土地施用猪粪中细菌径流方面的效果,人们知之甚少。本研究设计了一项田间淋溶仪研究,以评估地表土壤水文条件和植被对模拟降雨条件下猪粪携带的大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌的截留效果。实验小区(6.5 m×3.9 m)设置在一个 5%坡度的淋溶仪上,具有壤质表土、粘壤土或壤土底土和可控地下水水位。在距小区顶部 4.5 m 的位置安装了三个小型截流小水槽,而其余所有径流则在底部的排水沟中收集。小区分为裸土和草地植被,降雨前通过地下水位控制上层土壤的含水量。在小区顶部施用接种了大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌并添加溴化物示踪剂的猪粪浆,并同时启动模拟降雨。每隔 5 分钟收集和分析径流。未发现大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌截留效果有显著差异。在初始湿润土壤表面条件下,裸土和植被小区的入渗都有限;几乎所有的溴化物和约 30%的细菌都在径流水中回收。在初始干燥土壤表面条件下,裸土和植被小区之间存在显著差异。在裸土小区中,干燥和湿润条件下的径流水、溴化物和细菌回收率相当。然而,在干燥的植被小区中,有 50%至 75%的水会因入渗而损失,而溴化物回收率在 14%至 36%之间,细菌回收率仅为 5%。从小水槽获得的数据显示出小区内的很大的空间异质性。对小区微地形的 GIS 分析表明,位于汇流区的小水槽收集了大部分细菌。总体而言,VFS 的效率,就猪粪细菌的截留而言,因土壤表面的水文条件而有很大差异。因此,VFS 的推荐应考虑到预期的地表土壤水分饱和度以及 VFS 的相对土壤水分储存能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验