• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物警戒报告不足:对意大利全科医生的干预(艾米利亚-罗马涅地区)。

Underreporting in pharmacovigilance: an intervention for Italian GPs (Emilia-Romagna region).

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, University of Bologna, Via Irnerio 48, Postal Code 40126, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Feb;69(2):237-44. doi: 10.1007/s00228-012-1321-7. Epub 2012 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00228-012-1321-7
PMID:22706618
Abstract

PURPOSE

Underreporting is a major limitation of spontaneous reporting systems for suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Several interventions to increase the ADR reporting rate have been proposed, but their efficacy remains poorly investigated.

METHODS

This was a questionnaire study aimed at assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of general practitioners (GPs) regarding ADR reporting and at evaluating whether a monthly e-mail-based newsletter on drug safety could affect the rate and the quality of the ADR reports submitted by these GPs. Three local health authorities (LHAs) of the Emilia-Romagna region were chosen on the basis of their ADR reporting rate during the period preceding the study: Rimini (high), Ferrara (average), and Piacenza (low reporting rate). All GPs (n = 737) associated with these three LHAs were recruited. The pooled number of ADR reports sent by GPs in the remaining seven LHAs of the region was used as controls. The study covered a period of 3 years and was divided into: (1) identification of the reasons leading to underreporting through a questionnaire (Phase I); (2) the intervention, i.e., sending a newsletter for a 10-month period (Phase II); (3) evaluation of the intervention outcomes during the 10 months following the period in which the newsletter had been received (Phase III).

RESULTS

Among GPs involved, 22.8 % returned the questionnaire. Over 94 % of the respondents considered the spontaneous reporting of suspected ADRs to be part of their professional obligations, but only 6.5 % had submitted at least one report in the previous 6 months. Following the completion of Phase II, the overall number of reports coming from the LHAs subjected to the intervention rose by 49.2 % compared to 2009, while the number of reports coming from the control LHAs increased by 8.8 %. Rimini and Piacenza showed a 200 % increase in the number of ADR reports submitted by GPs, while the number of ADR reported submitted by the control group decreased by 25.5 %. In 2011, the number of overall ADRs reports from the LHAs subjected to the intervention decreased by 6.8 %; this decrease reached 50.0 % of the GPs. Control HLAs showed an overall decline of 4.3 %, while the total number of ADRs from GPs increased by 63.3 %. Ferrara was excluded from the analysis due to confounding factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The periodic e-mail update on the safety of drugs represents an effective and inexpensive way to raise the awareness of GPs on the importance of spontaneous ADR reporting. Since the outcome of the intervention seemed to disappear after the intervention was stopped, there appears to be a need to adopt a policy of regular updates and educational strategies for health professionals.

摘要

目的

自发报告系统报告疑似药物不良反应(ADR)存在漏报的主要局限性。为提高ADR 报告率,已提出多种干预措施,但这些措施的效果仍未得到充分研究。

方法

这是一项问卷调查研究,旨在评估全科医生(GP)对 ADR 报告的知识、态度和行为,并评估每月基于电子邮件的药物安全通讯是否会影响这些 GP 提交的 ADR 报告的数量和质量。根据研究前期间 Emilia-Romagna 地区各地方卫生当局(LHA)的 ADR 报告率,选择了三个 LHA:里米尼(高)、费拉拉(中)和皮亚琴扎(低)。招募了与这三个 LHA 相关的所有 737 名 GP。该地区其余七个 LHA 的 GP 提交的 ADR 报告数量被用作对照。研究覆盖了 3 年时间,分为三个阶段:(1)通过问卷调查确定导致漏报的原因(第一阶段);(2)干预措施,即发送通讯 10 个月(第二阶段);(3)在收到通讯后的 10 个月内评估干预结果(第三阶段)。

结果

参与的 GP 中,22.8% 回了问卷。超过 94%的受访者认为,报告疑似 ADR 是他们的职业义务之一,但只有 6.5%的人在过去 6 个月内提交过至少一份报告。在第二阶段完成后,与干预相关的 LHA 的总体报告数量比 2009 年增加了 49.2%,而对照 LHA 的报告数量增加了 8.8%。里米尼和皮亚琴扎的 GP 提交的 ADR 报告数量增加了 200%,而对照组的报告数量减少了 25.5%。2011 年,干预 LHA 的总体 ADR 报告数量下降了 6.8%;GP 的降幅达到了 50.0%。对照 LHA 总体下降了 4.3%,而 GP 的 ADR 报告总数增加了 63.3%。由于混杂因素,费拉拉被排除在分析之外。

结论

定期电子邮件更新药物安全性是提高 GP 对自发 ADR 报告重要性认识的有效且经济实惠的方法。由于干预停止后,干预的效果似乎消失了,因此似乎需要为卫生专业人员制定定期更新和教育策略的政策。

相似文献

1
Underreporting in pharmacovigilance: an intervention for Italian GPs (Emilia-Romagna region).药物警戒报告不足:对意大利全科医生的干预(艾米利亚-罗马涅地区)。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Feb;69(2):237-44. doi: 10.1007/s00228-012-1321-7. Epub 2012 Jun 17.
2
Effect of pharmacist involvement on patient reporting of adverse drug reactions: first Italian study.药师参与对患者报告药物不良反应的影响:意大利的首次研究。
Drug Saf. 2013 Apr;36(4):267-76. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0028-8.
3
Are consumers ready to take part in the Pharmacovigilance System?--a Portuguese preliminary study concerning ADR reporting.消费者准备好参与药物警戒系统了吗?——一项关于药品不良反应报告的葡萄牙初步研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jul;71(7):883-90. doi: 10.1007/s00228-015-1867-2. Epub 2015 May 26.
4
Completeness of Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Reports Sent by General Practitioners to a Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre: A Descriptive Study.全科医生向地区药物警戒中心发送的自发药品不良反应报告的完整性:一项描述性研究。
Drug Saf. 2016 Dec;39(12):1189-1195. doi: 10.1007/s40264-016-0463-4.
5
Reporting, handling, and subjective importance of adverse drug reactions among general practitioners: an exploratory cross-sectional survey.报告、处理和全科医生对药物不良反应的主观重要性:一项探索性横断面调查。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2021 Aug;20(8):979-985. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1933430. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
6
Knowledge, attitude and practice of General Practitioners towards adverse drug reaction reporting in South of Iran, Shiraz (Pharmacoepidemiology report).伊朗南部设拉子全科医生对药物不良反应报告的知识、态度和实践(药物流行病学报告)
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2016 Mar 16;28(1):25-31. doi: 10.3233/JRS-160670.
7
First French experience of ADR reporting by patients after a mass immunization campaign with Influenza A (H1N1) pandemic vaccines: a comparison of reports submitted by patients and healthcare professionals.法国首次报告大流行流感疫苗(H1N1)接种后患者不良反应:患者和医务人员报告的比较。
Drug Saf. 2012 Oct 1;35(10):845-54. doi: 10.1007/BF03261980.
8
An exploratory study of knowledge, attitudes, practice and barriers towards adverse drug reaction reporting among healthcare professionals in Malta.马耳他医疗保健专业人员对药物不良反应报告的知识、态度、实践和障碍的探索性研究。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2024;35(3):271-286. doi: 10.3233/JRS-230055.
9
Evaluation of patient reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK 'Yellow Card Scheme': literature review, descriptive and qualitative analyses, and questionnaire surveys.评估患者向英国“黄卡计划”报告药物不良反应的情况:文献回顾、描述性和定性分析以及问卷调查。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 May;15(20):1-234, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta15200.
10
Evaluation of a simplified pharmacovigilance tool for general practitioners: 5 years of insight.评价一款针对全科医生的简化药物警戒工具:5 年的深入观察。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 20;14(1):1766. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51753-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-finasteride syndrome - a true clinical entity?非那雄胺后综合征——一种真实的临床病症?
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Feb 14. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01025-6.
2
Improving adverse drug event reporting by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员对药物不良事件的报告率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 29;10(10):CD012594. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012594.pub2.
3
Promoting Patient Engagement in Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting: A Novel Approach Utilizing Set Induction-Based Skill Questionnaires.促进患者参与药物不良反应报告:一种利用基于情景诱导的技能问卷的新方法。

本文引用的文献

1
Quality check of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting forms of different countries.不同国家自发药物不良反应报告表的质量检查。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Nov;19(11):1181-5. doi: 10.1002/pds.2004.
2
Reporting of adverse drug reactions by general practitioners: a questionnaire-based study in the Netherlands.全科医生对药物不良反应的报告:荷兰一项基于问卷调查的研究。
Drug Saf. 2009;32(10):851-8. doi: 10.2165/11314490-000000000-00000.
3
A web-based quantitative signal detection system on adverse drug reaction in China.
Curr Drug Saf. 2025;20(3):329-333. doi: 10.2174/0115748863308469240819042052.
4
Overview of global monitoring systems for the side effects and adverse events associated with medicinal cannabis use: a scoping review using a systematic approach.医用大麻使用相关副作用和不良事件的全球监测系统概述:一项采用系统方法的范围综述
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 18;14(7):e085166. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085166.
5
Pharmacovigilance Practices by Healthcare Providers in Oncology: A Cross-Sectional Study.肿瘤学领域医疗服务提供者的药物警戒实践:一项横断面研究。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 May 26;17(6):683. doi: 10.3390/ph17060683.
6
Real-World Safety Data of the Orphan Drug Onasemnogene Abeparvovec (Zolgensma) for the SMA Rare Disease: A Pharmacovigilance Study Based on the EMA Adverse Event Reporting System.用于脊髓性肌萎缩症罕见病的孤儿药onasemnogene abeparvovec(Zolgensma)的真实世界安全性数据:一项基于欧洲药品管理局不良事件报告系统的药物警戒研究。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Mar 19;17(3):394. doi: 10.3390/ph17030394.
7
Educational interventions in pharmacovigilance to improve the knowledge, attitude and the report of adverse drug reactions in healthcare professionals: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.药物警戒教育干预措施以提高医疗保健专业人员的知识、态度和药物不良反应报告:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Daru. 2024 Jun;32(1):421-434. doi: 10.1007/s40199-024-00508-z. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
8
Evaluation of a simplified pharmacovigilance tool for general practitioners: 5 years of insight.评价一款针对全科医生的简化药物警戒工具:5 年的深入观察。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 20;14(1):1766. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51753-w.
9
Factors Associated with Underreporting of Adverse Drug Reactions by Health Care Professionals: A Systematic Review Update.与医疗保健专业人员报告药物不良反应不足相关的因素:系统评价更新。
Drug Saf. 2023 Jul;46(7):625-636. doi: 10.1007/s40264-023-01302-7. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
10
Impact of the Role of the Clinical Pharmacist on the Underreporting of Adverse Drug Reactions at a Peruvian hospital.临床药师的作用对秘鲁一家医院药品不良反应漏报情况的影响
Hosp Pharm. 2023 Jun;58(3):295-303. doi: 10.1177/00185787221138006. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
中国基于网络的药物不良反应定量信号检测系统。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Jul;65(7):729-41. doi: 10.1007/s00228-009-0638-3. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
4
Effects of e-mails containing ADR information and a current case report on ADR reporting rate and quality of reports.包含药品不良反应(ADR)信息和一份当前病例报告的电子邮件对ADR报告率及报告质量的影响。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 May;65(5):511-4. doi: 10.1007/s00228-008-0603-6. Epub 2009 Jan 7.
5
Influence of regulatory measures on the rate of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting in Italy.监管措施对意大利药物自发不良反应报告率的影响。
Drug Saf. 2008;31(7):609-16. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200831070-00006.
6
Influence of an e-mail with a drug information attachment on sales of prescribed drugs: a randomized controlled study.附带药品信息附件的电子邮件对处方药销售的影响:一项随机对照研究。
BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Oct 18;7:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6904-7-12.
7
An educational intervention to improve physician reporting of adverse drug reactions: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.一项旨在改善医生药品不良反应报告情况的教育干预措施:一项整群随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2006 Sep 6;296(9):1086-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.9.1086.
8
Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions : a systematic review.药品不良反应报告不足:一项系统评价
Drug Saf. 2006;29(5):385-96. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200629050-00003.
9
Physicians' attitudes and adverse drug reaction reporting : a case-control study in Portugal.医生的态度与药品不良反应报告:葡萄牙的一项病例对照研究
Drug Saf. 2005;28(9):825-33. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200528090-00007.
10
Under-reporting of serious adverse drug reactions in Sweden.瑞典严重药品不良反应报告不足的情况。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004 Jul;13(7):483-7. doi: 10.1002/pds.962.