• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年和老年职业足球运动员有氧适能和柔韧性的赛季前比较。

A pre-season comparison of aerobic fitness and flexibility of younger and older professional soccer players.

机构信息

Exercise and Sports Sciences Graduate Program, Gama Filho University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Sports Med. 2012 Nov;33(11):867-72. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1311597. Epub 2012 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1055/s-0032-1311597
PMID:22706948
Abstract

Aerobic fitness and flexibility generally present age-related decreases, yet the influence of age on these variables in soccer players is still unknown. We obtained oxygen consumption (VO(2)) and heart rate (HR) at 12 km · h (- 1), anaerobic threshold and maximum intensities, and athletes' flexibility profiles using Flexitest (FLX). Pre-season data (2005-2011) from the 2 extreme age terciles (n=54) - YOUNGER (17-22 years old) and OLDER (27-36 years old) - of a group of 162 players from an elite Brazilian soccer club were compared. The effects of aging were also assessed by contrasting VO(2), HR and FLX linear regressions - slope and intercept - vs. age-predicted and reference values. The results were similar between the YOUNGER and OLDER terciles for VO(2max), at 62.7 ± 6.1 vs. 63.2 ± 6.2 mL · kg (- 1) · min (- 1), respectively (p=0.67), effect size (ES)=0.08, and for FLX, at 43 ± 5.9 vs. 41 ± 6.0, respectively (p=0.11, ES=0.34); the YOUNGER tercile exhibited higher values for HRmax than the OLDER tercile, at 194 ± 8.1 vs. 189 ± 8.8 b · min (- 1), (p<0.01, ES=0.59). Players in the OLDER tercile did not present an age-predicted decrease in VO(2max), whereas HRmax and FLX diminished with age as predicted. We conclude that, at least for these variables, younger and older players were effectively identical in their pre-season levels of conditioning.

摘要

有氧适能和灵活性通常随年龄增长而下降,但足球运动员的这些变量受年龄的影响仍不清楚。我们使用 Flexitest(FLX)获得了 12km·h-1 时的耗氧量(VO2)和心率(HR)、无氧阈和最大强度,以及运动员的灵活性特征。对来自巴西一家精英足球俱乐部的 162 名球员中 2 个极端年龄三分位数(n=54)的季前数据(2005-2011 年)进行了比较,这 2 个年龄三分位数为 YOUNGER(17-22 岁)和 OLDER(27-36 岁)。还通过对比 VO2、HR 和 FLX 线性回归的斜率和截距与年龄预测值和参考值,评估了衰老的影响。在 VO2max 方面,YOUNGER 三分位数和 OLDER 三分位数的结果相似,分别为 62.7±6.1 和 63.2±6.2 mL·kg-1·min-1(p=0.67),效应量(ES)为 0.08,在 FLX 方面,YOUNGER 三分位数和 OLDER 三分位数的结果相似,分别为 43±5.9 和 41±6.0(p=0.11,ES=0.34);YOUNGER 三分位数的 HRmax 值高于 OLDER 三分位数,分别为 194±8.1 和 189±8.8 b·min-1(p<0.01,ES=0.59)。OLDER 三分位数的球员在 VO2max 方面没有出现年龄预测的下降,而 HRmax 和 FLX 则如预测的那样随年龄增长而下降。我们得出结论,至少在这些变量方面,年轻和年长的球员在赛季前的身体状况方面实际上是相同的。

相似文献

1
A pre-season comparison of aerobic fitness and flexibility of younger and older professional soccer players.青少年和老年职业足球运动员有氧适能和柔韧性的赛季前比较。
Int J Sports Med. 2012 Nov;33(11):867-72. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1311597. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
2
Endurance training and testing with the ball in young elite soccer players.年轻精英足球运动员的耐力训练及用球测试
Br J Sports Med. 2005 Jan;39(1):24-8. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2003.009985.
3
Individual training-load and aerobic-fitness variables in premiership soccer players during the precompetitive season.在赛前赛季中,顶级足球运动员的个体训练负荷和有氧适能变量。
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Mar;27(3):631-6. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825dbd81.
4
Physiological and performance effects of generic versus specific aerobic training in soccer players.普通有氧训练与特定有氧训练对足球运动员的生理及运动表现影响
Int J Sports Med. 2006 Jun;27(6):483-92. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-865839.
5
The use of an 8-week mixed-intensity interval endurance-training program improves the aerobic fitness of female soccer players.8 周混合强度间歇耐力训练方案可提高女足运动员的有氧适能。
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Jul;24(7):1773-81. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ce2495.
6
Physiological profile and activity pattern of young soccer players during match play.青少年足球运动员在比赛中的生理特征和活动模式。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Jan;36(1):168-74. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000106187.05259.96.
7
Development of a field test for evaluating aerobic fitness.发展一种用于评估有氧适能的现场测试。
Int J Sports Med. 2012 May;33(5):346-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1301321. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
8
The assessment of maximal aerobic power with the multistage fitness test in young women soccer players.用多级体能测试评估年轻女足运动员的最大有氧能力。
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Jun;24(6):1488-94. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d8e97a.
9
Lactate threshold responses to a season of professional British youth soccer.乳酸阈值对英国职业青年足球一个赛季的反应。
Br J Sports Med. 2005 Jul;39(7):432-6. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.012260.
10
Physical responses of different small-sided game formats in elite youth soccer players.优秀青年足球运动员不同小场地比赛形式的身体反应。
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 May;26(5):1353-60. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318231ab99.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Aerobic Fitness and Repeated Sprint Ability in Elite Male Soccer: A Systematic Review of Test Protocols Used in Practice and Research.精英男性足球运动员有氧适能和反复冲刺能力的评估:对实践和研究中使用的测试方案的系统评价
Sports Med. 2025 Apr 12. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02188-4.
2
Submaximal Fitness Tests in Team Sports: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Physiological State.团队运动中的次最大体能测试:评估生理状态的理论框架。
Sports Med. 2022 Nov;52(11):2605-2626. doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01712-0. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
3
Somatic, Endurance Performance and Heart Rate Variability Profiles of Professional Soccer Players Grouped According to Age.
根据年龄分组的职业足球运动员的身体状况、耐力表现和心率变异性概况
J Hum Kinet. 2016 Dec 15;54:65-74. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2016-0035. eCollection 2016 Dec 1.
4
Comparison of the Kinematic Patterns of Kick Between Brazilian and Japanese Young Soccer Players.巴西和日本年轻足球运动员踢球运动模式的比较。
Asian J Sports Med. 2016 Jun 1;7(2):e33645. doi: 10.5812/asjsm.33645. eCollection 2016 Jun.
5
A brief review of strength and ballistic assessment methodologies in sport.体育中力量与弹道评估方法的简要综述。
Sports Med. 2014 May;44(5):603-23. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0145-2.
6
Age-related mobility loss is joint-specific: an analysis from 6,000 Flexitest results.与年龄相关的活动能力丧失具有关节特异性:来自6000份Flexitest测试结果的分析。
Age (Dordr). 2013 Dec;35(6):2399-407. doi: 10.1007/s11357-013-9525-z. Epub 2013 Mar 27.