Padilla-Frausto D Imelda, Wallace Steven P
UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Policy Brief UCLA Cent Health Policy Res. 2012 May(PB2012-1):1-8.
This policy brief highlights results from a survey of a broad sample of the California legislature on their data and information needs, as well as their familiarity and use of various economic measures. It finds that legislative staff most often use the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) when they are making recommendations about policy and evaluating programs for low-income populations. Yet the FPL does not meet most of the criteria for economic data that legislative staff say they want. Specifically, the FPL does not measure local conditions, it is not based on current costs, and it does not take into account all types of expenses faced by low-income families. Other measures of economic security more accurately meet legislative staffs' stated data and information needs, including the Elder and Family Economic Security Indices, the U.S. Census Supplemental Poverty Measure and Relative Poverty Measures. Improving awareness and usability of these other measures of economic security can better match the data and information needs of the California legislature and can contribute to innovative solutions to help California's most vulnerable populations.
本政策简报重点介绍了一项针对加利福尼亚州立法机构广泛样本进行的调查结果,该调查涉及他们的数据和信息需求,以及他们对各种经济指标的熟悉程度和使用情况。调查发现,立法人员在就政策提出建议和评估针对低收入人群的项目时,最常使用联邦贫困线(FPL)。然而,联邦贫困线并不符合立法人员所说的他们想要的经济数据的大多数标准。具体而言,联邦贫困线没有衡量当地情况,不是基于当前成本,也没有考虑到低收入家庭面临的所有类型的支出。其他经济安全指标更准确地满足了立法人员所述的数据和信息需求,包括老年人和家庭经济安全指数、美国人口普查补充贫困衡量标准和相对贫困衡量标准。提高对这些其他经济安全指标的认识和可用性,可以更好地满足加利福尼亚州立法机构的数据和信息需求,并有助于提出创新解决方案,以帮助加利福尼亚州最脆弱的人群。