Winnipeg Regional Health Authority University of Manitoba University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Milbank Q. 2012 Jun;90(2):347-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00666.x.
One of health care's foremost challenges is the achievement of integration and collaboration among the groups providing care. Yet this fundamentally group-related issue is typically discussed in terms of interpersonal relations or operational issues, not group processes.
We conducted a systematic search for literature offering a group-based analysis and examined it through the lens of the social identity approach (SIA). Founded in the insight that group memberships form an important part of the self-concept, the SIA encompasses five dimensions: social identity, social structure, identity content, strength of identification, and context.
Our search yielded 348 reports, 114 of which cited social identity. However, SIA-citing reports varied in both compatibility with the SIA's metatheoretical paradigm and applied relevance to health care; conversely, some non-SIA-citers offered SIA-congruent analyses. We analyzed the various combinations and interpretations of the five SIA dimensions, identifying ten major conceptual currents. Examining these in the light of the SIA yielded a cohesive, multifaceted picture of (inter)group relations in health care.
The SIA offers a coherent framework for integrating a diverse, far-flung literature on health care groups. Further research should take advantage of the full depth and complexity of the approach, remain sensitive to the unique features of the health care context, and devote particular attention to identity mobilization and context change as key drivers of system transformation. Our article concludes with a set of "guiding questions" to help health care leaders recognize the group dimension of organizational problems, identify mechanisms for change, and move forward by working with and through social identities, not against them.
医疗保健面临的首要挑战之一是实现提供护理的各群体之间的整合与协作。然而,这个基本的群体相关问题通常是从人际关系或运营问题的角度来讨论的,而不是从群体过程的角度。
我们系统地搜索了提供基于群体的分析的文献,并通过社会认同方法(SIA)的视角对其进行了研究。SIA 的基础是这样一种观点,即群体成员身份是自我概念的重要组成部分,它包含五个维度:社会认同、社会结构、认同内容、认同强度和背景。
我们的搜索产生了 348 份报告,其中 114 份提到了社会认同。然而,SIA 引用的报告在与 SIA 的元理论范式的兼容性和对医疗保健的应用相关性方面存在差异;相反,一些非 SIA 引用者提供了与 SIA 一致的分析。我们分析了这五个 SIA 维度的各种组合和解释,确定了十个主要的概念潮流。根据 SIA 对这些潮流进行研究,得出了一个关于医疗保健群体中(内部和外部)群体关系的连贯的、多方面的图景。
SIA 为整合关于医疗保健群体的多样化、广泛分布的文献提供了一个连贯的框架。进一步的研究应该利用该方法的全部深度和复杂性,保持对医疗保健背景独特性的敏感性,并特别关注身份动员和背景变化作为系统变革的关键驱动力。我们的文章最后提出了一组“指导问题”,以帮助医疗保健领导者认识到组织问题的群体维度,确定变革机制,并通过与社会认同合作并利用其,而不是反对其来推进工作。