Scottish Centre for Simulation and Clinical Human Factors, NHS Forth Valley, Larbert, UK.
Acute medicine, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2243694. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2243694.
Patient care depends on collaborative practice. Debate remains as to the best approach to providing education for collaboration, with educational interventions often far removed from the realities of the clinical workplace. Understanding the approaches used for collaboration in clinical practice could inform practical strategies for training. For internal medicine trainees, this involves collaboration with other professions but also with other specialties. This study aimed to explore the approaches that internal medicine trainees use for interprofessional collaboration and the ways that these approaches vary when internal medicine trainees interact with different healthcare provider groups.
Following ethical approval and participant consent, interprofessional communication workshops between August 2020 and March 2021 were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Workshops involved groups of internal medicine trainees discussing collaboration challenges and the approaches they use in clinical practice. This framework analysis study used the interprofessional collaboration framework described by Bainbridge and Regehr (building social capital, perspective taking and negotiating priorities and resources), and cross-referenced the categorised data with the healthcare groups that trainees collaborate with, to look for patterns in the data.
Seventeen workshops, involving 100 trainees, were included. Trainees described relationship building, perspective taking and negotiating priorities and resources. Relationship building was a modification to the original framework domain of building social capital. Themes of power and civility transcended domains with evidence of using hierarchy as leverage when negotiating and employing civility as a tactical approach throughout.
This bi-dimensional analysis highlights patterns of perspective taking when collaborating with other specialties and professions, and the approaches to negotiation of courting favour and coercion when interacting with other specialties. This study provides evidence of the strategies currently utilised by internal medicine trainees, with different healthcare groups, and presents a modified framework which could inform the development of training for collaboration.
患者护理依赖于协作实践。对于提供协作教育的最佳方法仍存在争议,而教育干预往往与临床工作场所的实际情况相去甚远。了解临床实践中协作所采用的方法可以为培训提供实用策略。对于内科住院医师来说,这涉及到与其他专业的合作,也涉及到与其他专业的合作。本研究旨在探讨内科住院医师用于跨专业合作的方法,以及当内科住院医师与不同医疗保健提供者群体互动时,这些方法的变化方式。
在获得伦理批准和参与者同意后,2020 年 8 月至 2021 年 3 月期间,对专业间沟通研讨会进行了录音,并逐字记录。研讨会涉及内科住院医师小组讨论协作挑战以及他们在临床实践中使用的方法。这项框架分析研究使用了 Bainbridge 和 Regehr 描述的专业间协作框架(建立社会资本、换位思考和协商优先级和资源),并将分类数据与住院医师合作的医疗保健群体交叉引用,以寻找数据中的模式。
共纳入 17 个研讨会,涉及 100 名住院医师。住院医师描述了关系建立、换位思考和协商优先级和资源。关系建立是对原始框架领域建立社会资本的修改。权力和礼貌的主题超越了各个领域,有证据表明在协商时利用层次结构作为杠杆,并在整个过程中运用礼貌作为一种策略方法。
这种二维分析突出了与其他专业和专业合作时换位思考的模式,以及与其他专业互动时协商拉拢和胁迫的方法。这项研究提供了内科住院医师与不同医疗保健群体目前使用的策略的证据,并提出了一个经过修改的框架,可以为协作培训的发展提供信息。