Proops Leanne, Burden Faith, Osthaus Britta
School of Psychology, University of Exeter, UK.
Behav Processes. 2012 Jul;90(3):337-42. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.03.012. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
Donkeys and mules are frequently kept as companion animals for horses and ponies, with these different equids often being considered a homogenous group. However, the extent to which domestic equids form inter-specific bonds and display similar social behaviour when living in a mixed herd has not previously been studied. Here we compare the social organization of these three (sub)species when housed together, providing the first systematic analysis of how genetic hybridization is expressed in the social behaviour of mules. A group of 16 mules, donkeys and ponies was observed for 70h and preferred associates, dominance rank and the linearity of the group's hierarchy was determined. The different equids formed distinct affiliative groups that were ordered in a linear hierarchy with ponies as the most dominant, mules in the middle ranks and donkeys in the lowest ranks. Within each equid subgroup, the strength of the hierarchy also varied. Thus in the present study, the three (sub)species displayed different social organization and levels of dominance and preferred to associate with animals of the same equid type, given the opportunity. These results suggest that different domestic equid (sub)species display variations in social behaviour that are likely to have a strong genetic basis.
驴和骡常被作为马和矮种马的伴侣动物饲养,这些不同的马科动物通常被视为一个同质群体。然而,此前尚未研究过家养马科动物在混群生活时形成种间联系并表现出相似社会行为的程度。在此,我们比较了这三个(亚)种在一起饲养时的社会组织,首次系统分析了遗传杂交在骡的社会行为中的表现方式。观察了一组由16匹骡、驴和矮种马组成的群体70小时,并确定了偏好的同伴、优势等级以及群体等级制度的线性关系。不同的马科动物形成了不同的亲和群体,这些群体按线性等级排列,矮种马最为占主导地位,骡处于中间等级,驴处于最低等级。在每个马科动物亚组中,等级制度的强度也有所不同。因此,在本研究中,这三个(亚)种表现出不同的社会组织和优势水平,并且在有机会时更倾向于与同类型的马科动物交往。这些结果表明,不同的家养马科(亚)种在社会行为上表现出差异,这可能有很强的遗传基础。