Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
World J Surg. 2012 Oct;36(10):2497-502. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1682-1.
Although postoperative hematoma after thyroidectomy is uncommon, patients traditionally have been advised to stay overnight in the hospital for monitoring. With the growing demand for outpatient thyroidectomy, we assessed its safety and feasibility by evaluating the potential risk factors and timing of postoperative hematoma after thyroidectomy.
From 1995-2011, 3,086 consecutive patients underwent thyroidectomy at our institution; of these, 22 (0.7 %) developed a postoperative hematoma that required surgical reexploration (group I). Potential risk factors were compared between group I and those without hematoma (n = 3,045) or with hematoma but not requiring reexploration (n = 19; group II). Variables that were significant in the univariate analysis were entered into multivariate analysis by binary logistic regression analysis.
Group I was significantly more likely to have undergone previous thyroid operation than group II (27.3 vs. 8.2 %, p = 0.007). The median weight of excised thyroid gland (71.8 vs. 40 g, p = 0.018) and the median size of the dominant nodule (4.1 vs. 3 cm, p = 0.004) were significantly greater in group I than group II. Previous thyroid operation (odds ratio (OR) = 4.084; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.105-15.098; p = 0.035) and size of dominant nodule (OR = 1.315; 95 % CI, 1.024-1.687; p = 0.032) were independent factors for hematoma. Sixteen (72.7 %) had hematoma within 6 h, whereas the other 6 (27.3 %) had hematoma at 6-24 h.
Previous thyroid operation and large dominant nodule were independent risk factors for hematoma requiring surgical reexploration. Given that a quarter of hematoma occurred between 6 to 24 h after surgery, routine outpatient thyroidectomy could not be recommended.
尽管甲状腺手术后出现血肿并不常见,但传统上一直建议患者住院过夜以进行监测。随着对外科门诊甲状腺切除术需求的增长,我们通过评估甲状腺切除术后血肿的潜在风险因素和时间来评估其安全性和可行性。
1995 年至 2011 年,我院共对 3086 例患者进行了甲状腺切除术;其中 22 例(0.7%)发生术后血肿,需要再次手术探查(I 组)。比较 I 组与无血肿组(n=3045)或有血肿但无需再次手术组(n=19;II 组)之间的潜在危险因素。单因素分析中显著的变量通过二元逻辑回归分析纳入多变量分析。
I 组与 II 组相比,行甲状腺既往手术的比例显著更高(27.3% vs. 8.2%,p=0.007)。I 组切除甲状腺的重量中位数(71.8 克 vs. 40 克,p=0.018)和最大结节的大小中位数(4.1 厘米 vs. 3 厘米,p=0.004)均显著大于 II 组。甲状腺既往手术(优势比(OR)=4.084;95%置信区间(CI),1.105-15.098;p=0.035)和最大结节的大小(OR=1.315;95%CI,1.024-1.687;p=0.032)是血肿的独立因素。16 例(72.7%)在 6 小时内出现血肿,其余 6 例(27.3%)在 6-24 小时内出现血肿。
甲状腺既往手术和大的最大结节是需要手术再次探查的血肿的独立危险因素。由于四分之一的血肿发生在手术后 6 至 24 小时之间,因此不能推荐常规门诊甲状腺切除术。